AMC
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.Evidence as of 2026-09-17The desk's Snapshot
3 of 15 open to everyone · members see allRead the full desk report on AMC
Seven analysts, the debate, the risk review, every claim cited. And the same for every name you hold.
Free plan, no credit card required. Silver opens the full report, $19.99 a month. AI-written · every claim cites a source · Insight, not advice.
Overview · AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiaries, engages in the theatrical exhibition business. The company owns, operates, or has interests in theatres in the United States and Europe. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. was founded in 1920 and is headquartered in Leawood, Kansas.
Management team
- Mr. Edwin Gladbach · VP, Interim General Counsel & SecretaryFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Sean D. Goodman CPA · EVP of International Operations, IT & Procurement, CFO and TreasurerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Mark Jonathan Way · MD of Odeon Cinema Group & President of AMC EuropeFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Carla C. Chavarria CBP, CCP, PHR · Senior VP & Chief Human Resources OfficerFind on LinkedIn
Start free to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
−0.4 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
What the evidence shows
The evidence balance is Cautious (−0.4 of a possible +2; confidence high). Revenue moved from $ 1,300,200,000 in the three months ended 30 September 2025 (fiscal Q3 2025) to $ 1,045,400,000 in the three months ended 31 March 2026 (fiscal Q1 2026) and then to $ 1,596,700,000 in the three months ended 30 June 2026 (fiscal Q2 2026). Operating income swung from $ 35,800,000 (fiscal Q3 2025) to a loss of $ 45,700,000 (fiscal Q1 2026) and to $ 238,100,000 (fiscal Q2 2026), while net loss narrowed from negative $ 298,200,000 (fiscal Q3 2025) to negative $ 117,100,000 (fiscal Q1 2026) and to negative $ 11,400,000 (fiscal Q2 2026). Diluted weighted‑average shares outstanding rose to 892,604,638 as of 22 July 2026 (reported for fiscal Q2 2026), cash and cash equivalents increased to $ 778,400,000 as of 30 June 2026 (fiscal Q2 2026), and long‑term debt declined to $ 3,702,700,000 as of 30 June 2026 (fiscal Q2 2026). Trailing free cash flow is negative $ 1,075,200,000 (TTM) with free cash flow per share negative $ 1.4892, trailing EBITDA is $ 629,800,000 producing an EV/EBITDA of 8.92, and reported operating cash flow (TTM) is negative $ 876,700,000.
What the debate changed
No surviving claims were dropped or materially weakened in debate; 99% of what the desk raised survived and the evidence balance remained Cautious (−0.4). The analysts contested emphasis and interpretation around market momentum and retail coverage, but those contentions did not remove or materially alter the core filings‑based fundamentals and the enlarged share‑count record.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue was $1,300,200,000 in the three months ended 30 September 2025 (fiscal Q3 2025) then fell to $1,045,400,000 in the three months ended 31 March 2026 (fiscal Q1 2026) and rose to $1,596,700,000 in the three months ended 30 June 2026 (fiscal Q2 2026).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001411579-25-000073Operating income (loss) was $35,800,000 in the three months ended 30 September 2025 (fiscal Q3 2025), negative $45,700,000 in the three months ended 31 March 2026 (fiscal Q1 2026), and positive $238,100,000 in the three months ended 30 June 2026 (fiscal Q2 2026), showing a movement from loss to profit across these quarters.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001411579-25-000073Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
The 10-K filed 23 February 2026 reports the carrying value of corporate borrowings and finance lease liabilities was $4,038.5 million (aggregate principal $4,024.2 million) and finance lease liabilities of $52.5 million as of December 31, 2025.
10-K filed 2026-02-23The 10-K filed 23 February 2026 states the company had approximately $4.0 billion of discounted rental payments under operating leases with a weighted average remaining lease term of 7.7 years as of December 31, 2025.
10-K filed 2026-02-23Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
Six‑month momentum is +146.3% (ranked in the 99th percentile of the 561‑security research universe on 2026-09-16).
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-16weakened in debateSix‑month relative strength versus SPY is +133.6% (ranked in the 99th percentile of the 561‑security research universe on 2026-09-16).
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-16Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
Institutional holders reported a combined position value of $868.8M as of the 13F reporting period ended 2026-06-30.
13F holdings · 300 filers · as of 2026-06-30BlackRock, Inc. is listed as a top holder with a reported position value of $107.1M in the 13F for the period ended 2026-06-30.
13F holdings · 300 filers · as of 2026-06-30Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Several outlets are carrying coverage of a public clash over tokenized shares and control of shareholder-like rights for AMC stock, framed as a dispute between AMC and broker platforms.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-15Coverage specifically about the tokenized-shares issue appears in multiple distinct outlets, including a Simply Wall St piece describing AMC's objection to Robinhood's tokenized shares and Yahoo Finance stories reporting on the dispute and Robinhood's response.
News · simplywall.st · 2026-09-17Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The reported trailing-twelve-month free cash flow is negative $1,075,200,000 and free cash flow per share is negative $1.4892.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeTrailing operating income (TTM) is $320,800,000 and trailing EBITDA is $629,800,000, producing an enterprise value to EBITDA ratio of 8.92.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Several contemporaneous operating- and market-level data points together support a favorable read. Quarter-to-quarter fundamentals show rising revenue and a move from operating loss to a sizable operating profit (fundamentals-0, fundamentals-1) while net loss has materially narrowed (fundamentals-2), and cash balances rose sharply in Q2 2026 (fundamentals-5) as long-term debt declined modestly (fundamentals-4). Market signals show strong momentum and relative strength versus the market, with price above key moving averages and a recent golden cross (market-0, market-1, market-2), and trailing EBITDA is positive producing an EV/EBITDA below 9 (valuation-1), which together indicate improving operating performance alongside favorable market positioning. These points mitigate some liquidity and valuation concerns raised elsewhere by showing improving core results and stronger near-term liquidity.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.40
36 surviving claims rest on 12 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 22% of them, and 99% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The set of surviving claims is moderately informative but not robust: 36 claims draw on only 12 distinct sources, so source concentration limits independent corroboration. One analyst accounting for 22% of the claims and a 99% survival rate from the desk debate imply low internal contradiction but also potential analyst‑dependence, so treat the read as useful evidence that still warrants caution and cross‑checking against new filings or market moves.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 8th of 10 in Entertainment (as of 2026-09-16).
6-month relative strength ranks 1st of 10 in Entertainment (as of 2026-09-16).
90-day volatility ranks 2nd of 10 in Entertainment (as of 2026-09-16).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
11 filings· 2 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.7 to the score
4 documents· 3 cited
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes−1.1 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash+0.0 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.4 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
The full terminal on AMC Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Get this for the names you actually hold
Every name in your portfolio, researched the same way, plus the one thing no sample can show: how each one sits inside what you already own.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.