APH
AMPHENOL CORP /DE/Evidence as of 2026-10-02The desk's Snapshot
3 of 15 open to everyone · members see allRead the full desk report on APH
Seven analysts, the debate, the risk review, every claim cited. And the same for every name you hold.
Free plan, no credit card required. Silver opens the full report, $19.99 a month. AI-written · every claim cites a source · Insight, not advice.
Overview · AMPHENOL CORP /DE/
Amphenol Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, primarily designs, manufactures, and markets electrical, electronic, and fiber optic connectors in the United States, China, and internationally. It operates through three segments: Harsh Environment Solutions, Communications Solutions, and Interconnect and Sensor Systems. The company offers connectors and connector systems, including harsh environment data, power…
Management team
- Mr. Mark C. Turner · VP & TreasurerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Peter J. Straub · President of the Interconnect & Sensor Systems DivisionFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. William J. Doherty · President of Communications Solutions DivisionFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Luc Walter · President of Harsh Environment Solutions DivisionFind on LinkedIn
Start free to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it, not a rating or a recommendation.
−0.3 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled. The rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The surviving record, assessed as Mixed ( -0.3 of a possible +2; was -0.3 before debate), documents sequential revenue growth across the cited comparable periods: fiscal Q1 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-04-22) revenue $4,811,000,000; fiscal Q2 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-07-22) $5,650,300,000; fiscal Q3 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-10-21) $6,194,400,000; fiscal Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-28) $7,620,100,000; and fiscal Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-28) $8,758,100,000.
Gross profit and gross margins expanded across the same sequence (gross profit rising from $1,644,000,000 to $3,548,000,000 and implied margins from roughly 34.2% to 40.5%), and operating income and operating margins trended higher (operating income from $1,024,800,000 to $2,584,600,000 and implied margins from roughly 21.3% to 29.5%). The filings also confirm the CommScope acquisition closed on January 9, 2026, drove a meaningful increase in debt and interest expense, and left the balance sheet with $36,200,000,000 in total assets including $10,600,000,000 of goodwill.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else (no outside knowledge, no browsing), so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC (revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter) and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue rose across the most recent comparable quarters: fiscal Q1 2025 (2025-01-01 to 2025-03-31) was $4,811,000,000, fiscal Q2 2025 (2025-04-01 to 2025-06-30) was $5,650,300,000, fiscal Q3 2025 (2025-07-01 to 2025-09-30) was $6,194,400,000, fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31) was $7,620,100,000, and fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30) was $8,758,100,000.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001558370-25-005558Gross profit and gross margin expanded over the same sequence: gross profit was $1,644,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2025, $2,053,300,000 in fiscal Q2 2025, $2,359,300,000 in fiscal Q3 2025, $2,804,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026, and $3,548,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 — implying approximate gross margins of 34.2% (Q1 2025), 36.3% (Q2 2025), 38.1% (Q3 2025), 36.8% (Q1 2026) and 40.5% (Q2 2026) when divided by the reported revenues for those periods.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001558370-25-009610Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full: its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet; its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
The CommScope acquisition closed on January 9, 2026, and the filing states this is the largest acquisition in the Companys history (document filed 2026-02-11).
10-K filed 2026-02-11The Company states that financing a portion of the consideration for the CommScope acquisition resulted in a significant increase in the Companys debt and increased interest expense (document filed 2026-02-11).
10-K filed 2026-02-11Reads the signal panel above (momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta) and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
Three‑month momentum is -47.9% and six‑month momentum is -32.8% as of 2026-10-01, placing six‑month momentum in the 4th percentile of the 566‑issue research universe.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-10-01weakened in debateThe 12_1 momentum measure is +50.9% and ranks in the 86th percentile of the 566‑issue universe on 2026-10-01.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-10-01weakened in debateReads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
Institutional investors reported aggregate holdings valued at $197.45B as of 2026-06-30 in the latest 13F reporting period available.
13F holdings · 2344 filers · as of 2026-06-30The top five institutional holders reported were BlackRock, Inc. ($17.85B), VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC ($14.17B), FMR LLC ($12.44B), STATE STREET CORP ($10.50B), and Capital International Investors ($7.59B) as of 2026-06-30.
13F holdings · 2344 filers · as of 2026-06-30Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
A September 30, 2026 item lists new analyst coverage activity that includes an initiation on Amphenol (APH).
News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-09-30A September 30, 2026 headline frames Amphenol (APH) as a 'strong momentum stock.'
News · zacks.com · 2026-09-30Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5: who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The model reports an implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate that today's price would justify of 31.29% (0.3129).
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closePrice-to-FFO/FCF multiple (price to FCF) is 47.08, and FCF per share is $1.8198 on a trailing twelve-month basis.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score. The argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
The company’s recent operating performance shows multi-quarter revenue growth accompanied by expanding gross and operating margins and rising operating income and net income; these financials constitute strong, directly reported evidence of improving core profitability (high-strength, SEC-filed figures). Institutional ownership and ETF inclusion are sizable and increasing, which is medium-to-high strength evidence of ongoing investor interest. Positive analyst initiation/coverage and an earnings headline linking results to AI data-center demand provide additional market-confirming signals (medium strength). Against common concerns about acquisition-related debt, share issuance, and market-price weakness, the hard accounting evidence of higher margins and cash flow generation (reported FCF, operating cash flow, and EBITDA) is material and strengthens a favorable read on recent underlying business performance (medium strength).
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.40
32 surviving claims rest on 11 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 22% of them, and 95% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The evidence base is moderately concentrated: 32 surviving claims rely on 11 distinct sources, so multiple claims draw from the same filings and datasets. One analyst contributed about one fifth of the surviving claims and the desk’s deliberations kept 95% of raised items, so the read is relatively stable but still sensitive to a few key sources and one influential contributor.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 2nd of 2 in Electronic Components (as of 2026-10-01).
90-day volatility ranks 1st of 2 in Electronic Components (as of 2026-10-01).
dividend yield ranks 1st of 2 in Electronic Components (as of 2026-10-01).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment. When the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here (no outside knowledge, no browsing), and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
12 filings· 3 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data, not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+1.2 to the score
6 documents· 3 cited
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes−1.0 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash−0.8 to the score
2 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+1.0 to the score
3 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only; it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal; the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
The full terminal on APH Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Get this for the names you actually hold
Every name in your portfolio, researched the same way, plus the one thing no sample can show: how each one sits inside what you already own.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.