APO
Evidence as of 2026-09-02Overview · Apollo Global Management, Inc.
Apollo Global Management, Inc. is a private equity firm specializing in investments in credit, private equity and real estate markets. The firm's private equity investments include traditional buyouts, recapitalization, distressed buyouts and debt investments in real estate, corporate partner buyouts, distressed asset, corporate carve-outs, middle market, growth capital, turnaround, bridge, corporate restructuring, s…
Management team
- Ms. Yael Kenan Levy J.D. · Chief Compliance Officer and Partner of Legal, Compliance & Tax in New YorkFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Noah Gunn · MD of Finance & Global Head of Investor Relations in New YorkFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. John Zito C.F.A. · Partner, Head of Credit Business & Co-President of Apollo Asset Management Inc.Find on LinkedIn
- Mr. Martin Bernard Kelly · CFO, Partner & Principal Accounting OfficerFind on LinkedIn
Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
−0.2 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
What the evidence shows
The evidence balance is Mixed ( −0.2 of a possible +2; confidence high). Revenues rose to $11,153,000,000 in fiscal quarter ended 2026-08-05 from $5,059,000,000 in fiscal quarter ended 2026-05-05, and net income swung from a loss of $1,906,000,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 2026-05-05 to income of $1,361,000,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 2026-08-05. Diluted EPS moved from $(3.27) to $2.15 over the same two quarters, while shares outstanding increased from 569,003,922 as of 2024-05-03 to 590,543,159 as of 2026-08-05. The company shows higher reported long-term debt (point-in-time) rising from $10,588,000,000 as of 2024-12-31 to $14,220,000,000 as of 2026-03-31 and $13,727,000,000 as of 2026-06-30, cash on the balance sheet of $12,070,000,000 (as of 2023-06-30), a trailing twelve-month EPS of 2.65, and a trailing P/E of 49.69 with market capitalization of $77,768,628,609 and enterprise value of $79,425,628,609.
What the debate changed
The desk did not drop or weaken any surviving claim; the original read stands. Analysts argued over market signals versus fundamentals, but no claim was removed or materially weakened, so the debate left the evidence balance Mixed and the factual record—quarter-to-quarter revenue and profit swing, rising shares outstanding, elevated debt, and above-average short-term volatility—intact.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenues increased to $11,153,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30) from $5,059,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001858681-26-000040Net income swung from a loss of $1,906,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31) to net income of $1,361,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001858681-26-000026Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
An Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure current report (Form 8-K) was filed on August 24, 2026, stating that Apollo Global Management posted a presentation titled "Apollo Multi-Asset Prime Securities (AMAPS) Overview Presentation" on the Investor Relations section of its website.
8-K filed 2026-08-24The August 24, 2026 Form 8-K states that the information furnished under Item 7.01 is being furnished (not filed) and is not deemed to be filed for Section 18 purposes nor incorporated by reference into other filings except by specific reference.
8-K filed 2026-08-24Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
APO's 6-month momentum is +23.5% and its 6-month momentum ranks in the 83th percentile of a 547-stock research universe, indicating relatively strong intermediate-term price appreciation as of 2026-09-01.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-01weakened in debateThe 12_1 momentum metric is -9.5% and the momentum_12_1 rank is in the 23th percentile of 547, showing weaker performance on that longer momentum measure as of 2026-09-01.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-01weakened in debateReads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 2026-09-01, APO appears in the VOO ETF with a reported weight of 0.15% of that fund.
ETF constituents · market dataThe latest reported 13F data (as of 2026-03-31) shows a single institutional holder, SageView Advisory Group, LLC, reporting a position valued at $206,070; the filing notes a quarter-over-quarter value change of -95.2% and one exited position.
13F holdings · 1 filers · as of 2026-03-31Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
A headline reported Apollo Global Management shares fell 3.6% and discussed a GF Score of 76 (coverage dated 1 September 2026).
News · gurufocus.com · 2026-09-01Two outlets ran the same item that Apollo Global Management CFO Kelly Martin disposed of 4,534 shares and described the transaction as routine (published 1 September 2026).
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-01Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
Kelly Martin (Chief Financial Officer) sold 3,000 shares on 2026-08-14 for a total reported value of "$423k".
Form 4 · Kelly Martin (Chief Financial Officer) · $0 code G · 2026-08-14The same filing reports an additional entry on 2026-08-14 with action code G for 1,534 shares and a reported value of "$0".
Form 4 · Kelly Martin (Chief Financial Officer) · $0 code G · 2026-08-14Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The share price used is 131.69 on 2026-09-01.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeReported diluted trailing twelve months EPS is 2.65.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Several contemporaneous company filings show a sharp operational turnaround in fiscal Q2 2026: revenues more than doubled quarter-to-quarter (fundamentals-0) with net income swinging from a large loss to a $1.36B profit (fundamentals-1) and diluted EPS moving from $(3.27) to $2.15 (fundamentals-2); these are direct, high-quality filing-based datapoints and therefore strong evidence of recent improved operating results. Cash deployment activity is mixed but includes materially higher repurchases in Q1 2026 versus Q1 2025 (fundamentals-5), which, combined with reporting around sizable portfolio financing and repositioning related to ONEOK (news-3, news-4, news-5), supports the view that management is actively realizing and recycling capital; the news items are timely coverage from multiple outlets and provide medium-strength corroboration of portfolio action. Against the bear case, the increase in long-term debt (fundamentals-4) is a point of concern but is balanced in the filings by a large cash balance reported previously and a partial reduction in the most recent point-in-time debt balance (valuation-4, fundamentals-4), making the debt evidence moderate in strength and context-dependent. Share count has increased (fundamentals-3), but the magnitude of the operating improvement and net income recovery in Q2 strengthens the narrative that per-share performance has meaningfully improved; the dilutive-share evidence is strong but smaller in relative scale versus the quarter-to-quarter profit swing. Market-level cautions such as elevated volatility and a multi-year drawdown (market-2, market-3) are robust quantitative signals of risk, yet the 6-month momentum and relative strength metrics (market-0, market-4) are strong short-to-intermediate-term market signals that lend additional, independent support to a favorable read when taken together.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
diversified0.27
35 surviving claims rest on 20 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 17% of them, and 97% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The evidence base is moderately robust: 35 surviving claims draw on 20 distinct sources, so no single document dominates, and the largest analyst contribution is limited. However, 97% survival through the desk debate suggests few claims were successfully challenged, so some weak or correlated signals may persist; treat read-throughs that rely on thin or single-source items (e.g., specific filings or single computed signals) as more fragile.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 4th of 6 in Asset Management (as of 2026-09-01).
6-month relative strength ranks 2nd of 6 in Asset Management (as of 2026-09-01).
90-day volatility ranks 2nd of 6 in Asset Management (as of 2026-09-01).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
18 filings· 2 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.3 to the score
4 documents· 2 cited
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes+0.0 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash−0.4 to the score
3 holdings records· 2 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis−0.3 to the score
6 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 filing
Insider filings
Parsed Forms 3/4/5 from EDGAR: named insiders, share counts, prices, and 10b5-1 plan state — stated and inferred flags kept apart.
Read by Talbot−0.5 to the score
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on APO Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.