BA
The Boeing CompanyEvidence as of 2026-09-15The desk's Snapshot
3 of 15 open to everyone · members see allRead the full desk report on BA
Seven analysts, the debate, the risk review, every claim cited. And the same for every name you hold.
Free plan, no credit card required. Silver opens the full report, $19.99 a month. AI-written · every claim cites a source · Insight, not advice.
Overview · The Boeing Company
The Boeing Company, together with its subsidiaries, designs, develops, manufactures, sells, services, and supports commercial jetliners, military aircraft, satellites, missile defense, human space flight and launch systems, and services worldwide. The company operates through four segments: Commercial Airplanes; Defense, Space & Security; Global Services; and Boeing Capital. The Commercial Airplanes segment develops,…
Management team
- Mr. Stephen Parker · COO, Interim President and CEO of Boeing Defense, Space & SecurityFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. D. Christopher Raymond · Executive VP & CEO of Boeing Global ServicesFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Stephanie F. Pope · Executive Vice PresidentFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Brett C. Gerry J.D. · Chief Legal Officer & Executive VP of Global ComplianceFind on LinkedIn
Start free to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it, not a rating or a recommendation.
−0.5 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled. The rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The evidence balance is Cautious ( -0.5 of a possible +2; confidence high). Revenues rose from $ 22,217,000,000 in Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-15) to $ 24,560,000,000 in Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-21), while gross profit fell from $ 2,546,000,000 to $ 2,414,000,000, implying gross margin compression from about 11.46% to about 9.83% on those reported revenues. Operating income declined from $ 448,000,000 to $ 156,000,000 (operating margin roughly 2.02% to 0.63%), and net income moved from a $( 4,000,000) loss to a $( 444,000,000) loss with diluted EPS falling from $( 0.11) to $( 0.67).
Reported liquidity also weakened across the provided balance dates with cash and cash equivalents falling from $ 10,921,000,000 as of 2025-12-31 to $ 9,441,000,000 as of 2026-03-31 and $ 7,239,000,000 as of 2026-06-30, even as long-term debt declined from $ 53,848,000,000 to $ 45,596,000,000 over the same dates. Trailing twelve‑month free cash flow is negative $ 8,459,000,000, trailing EBITDA is negative $ 2,233,000,000, trailing EPS is negative $ 8.84, market capitalization is $ 166,191,104,105 and enterprise value is $ 204,548,104,105.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else (no outside knowledge, no browsing), so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC (revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter) and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenues increased from $22,217,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) to $24,560,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001628280-26-026458Gross profit fell from $2,546,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) to $2,414,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo), which implies a gross margin compression from about 11.46% to about 9.83% when compared with reported revenues for those quarters.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001628280-26-026458Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full: its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet; its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
The companys 10-K filed 30 January 2026 states that the introduction of new aircraft programs and derivatives (named examples: the 777X, 737-7 and 737-10) "takes years and involves significant risks associated with meeting development, testing, certification, and production schedules," and that the FAA "ultimately determines the timing of certification and entry into service," with the filing noting "there have been significant delays on each of these development programs."
10-K filed 2026-01-30The 10-K filed 30 January 2026 describes actions taken to "improve safety and quality and to address the issues identified by the FAA following the 737-9 door plug accident in January 2024," stating the company "slowed 737 production rates and delayed planned production rate increases," and further states those actions and the Spirit acquisition "significantly impacted our financial position, results of operations and cash flows."
10-K filed 2026-01-30Reads the signal panel above (momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta) and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
Three-month momentum is -4.0% as of 14 Sep 2026.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-14weakened in debateSix-month momentum is +0.2% and ranks in the 32th percentile of the 559-stock research universe on 14 Sep 2026.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-14weakened in debateReads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of the 2026-03-31 13F reporting period, institutional holders reported a combined market value of $124.57B in BA, with reported total value down 8.3% quarter-over-quarter and holder count declining by 30 to 2,510.
13F holdings · 2510 filers · as of 2026-03-31Top institutional reported holders in the 2026-03-31 filing include BlackRock, Inc. ($11.59B, value_qoq_pct -1.2), FMR LLC ($11.32B, value_qoq_pct -1.7), VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC ($10.15B, new position), STATE STREET CORP ($7.45B, value_qoq_pct -7.5), and Newport Trust Company, LLC ($5.71B, value_qoq_pct -10.9).
13F holdings · 2510 filers · as of 2026-03-31Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
A recent headline asks about what is driving demand signals for Boeing, indicating coverage focused on demand trends for the company.
News · kalkinemedia.com · 2026-09-14The coverage appears company-specific rather than framed as a market-wide story, based on the headline's explicit naming of Boeing (NYSE:BA).
News · kalkinemedia.com · 2026-09-14Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5: who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
Parker Stephen Kenneth (EVP, Pres. & CEO, BDS) reported an acquisition of 629.68 shares valued at "$132k" on 2026-08-28; no trading plan is indicated in the filing.
Form 4 · Parker Stephen Kenneth (EVP, Pres. & CEO, BDS) · $132k code F · 2026-08-28MALAVE JESUS JR (EVP and CFO) reported an acquisition of 4205.138 shares valued at "$962k" on 2026-08-17; no trading plan is indicated in the filing.
Form 4 · MALAVE JESUS JR (EVP and CFO) · $962k code F · 2026-08-17Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
Trailing twelve‑month free cash flow (FCF) is negative $8,459,000,000 for the period used in the valuation model.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeTrailing twelve‑month EBITDA is negative $2,233,000,000 for the period used in the valuation model.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score. The argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Several filed items and reported metrics together support a favorable read: sequential revenue growth (fundamentals-0), declining long-term debt (fundamentals-5) and rising stockholders' equity (fundamentals-7) are concrete balance-sheet and income-statement observations from recent SEC filings, and multiple insider acquisitions (insider-0, insider-1, insider-3, insider-4) and broad ETF holdings (ownership-2) indicate alignment and placement in diversified portfolios. The bear points on profitability and cash flow (fundamentals-1, fundamentals-2, fundamentals-3, valuation-0–2) are factual in the filings but some are contemporaneous quarter-to-quarter swings rather than multiyear secular metrics; revenue expansion and deleveraging are GAAP-reported items that partially offset those concerns when assessing operational recovery potential. The sell-side consensus (street consensus) showing many buy-side ratings in mid-September 2026 is an external corroborant of constructive analyst views, though it is a third-party viewpoint rather than company-filed data. Financial advisors often suggest weighing improving leverage metrics and insider activity alongside margin and cash-flow compression; the strongest supportive evidence here is the documented revenue increase and reduction in long-term debt, while the strongest bear evidence is the negative trailing FCF/EBITDA and deteriorating quarterly profitability.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.39
41 surviving claims rest on 15 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 22% of them, and 95% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The evidence set is moderately concentrated: 41 surviving claims draw on 15 sources, with one analyst contributing about one-fifth of the claims and a very high (95%) debate survival rate. That combination means the read appears durable in this dataset but is somewhat fragile to the viewpoints or errors of the largest contributor and to any missing/late filings not yet captured.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 8th of 9 in Aerospace & Defense (as of 2026-09-14).
6-month relative strength ranks 2nd of 9 in Aerospace & Defense (as of 2026-09-14).
90-day volatility ranks 2nd of 9 in Aerospace & Defense (as of 2026-09-14).
dividend yield ranks 8th of 9 in Aerospace & Defense (as of 2026-09-14).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment. When the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here (no outside knowledge, no browsing), and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
8 filings· 2 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data, not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer−0.3 to the score
13 documents· 2 cited
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes−1.0 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash−0.5 to the score
3 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.1 to the score
1 headline
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
5 filings· 2 cited
Insider filings
Parsed Forms 3/4/5 from EDGAR: named insiders, share counts, prices, and 10b5-1 plan state, with stated and inferred flags kept apart.
Read by Talbot+0.8 to the score
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only; it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal; the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
The full terminal on BA Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Get this for the names you actually hold
Every name in your portfolio, researched the same way, plus the one thing no sample can show: how each one sits inside what you already own.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.