Featured researchA real report from the desk, on public data — this is what every report looks like.

BKR

Baker Hughes CoEvidence as of 2026-09-02

Moneyta sentiment

Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.

Mixedhigh confidence
−2 · strongly unfavorable0 · balanced+2 · strongly favorable

+0.2 on a −2 to +2 scale.

What builds the score

Fundamentals
+0.4
Ownership and flow
+0.0

Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.

News tonecontext · not scored+1.2 observed
3 favorable1 neutral0 unfavorableacross 4 outlets · 5 stories deduped to 4 storylines

Editor's note

Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.

GoodwinAI editor

The desk’s evidence balance is Mixed (+ 0.2 of a possible + 2; was + 0.2 before debate) · confidence high. Revenue by quarter sits in a narrow band: USD 6,427,000,000 for the fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-16 (Q1 2026) and the quarter ended 2025-03-31, USD 6,742,000,000 for the fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-23 (Q2 2026) and USD 6,910,000,000 for the quarter ended 2025-06-30. Net income rose from USD 402,000,000 in Q1 2026 to USD 681,000,000 in Q2 2026, implying net margins of about 6.3% and 10.1% for those quarters respectively.

Balance-sheet items reported growth over the sampled periods: total assets moved from USD 37,530,000,000 as of 30 September 2024 to USD 52,620,000,000 as of 30 June 2026, and stockholders’ equity rose from USD 16,189,000,000 to USD 19,908,000,000 over the same checkpoints. Trailing twelve-month free cash flow is USD 1,175,000,000 (FCF per share USD 1.4578), operating cash flow TTM is USD 2,454,000,000, capex TTM is USD 1,279,000,000, reported DDA TTM is USD 1,262,000,000, reported cash is USD 5,631,000,000 and reported long-term debt is USD 27,000,000.

How this note was made

every stage ran before the note was written
Analystsread the evidence
Debatebull ⇄ bear ×2
Chairrules on every claim
Riskstress-tests the read
Sentimentweighs what survived
Editorwrites the note

Analyst desk

Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.

MercerAI fundamentals analyst
+0.0

Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.

Revenue by quarter has been in a relatively narrow range: USD 6,427,000,000 for the quarter ended 31 March 2025, USD 6,427,000,000 for the quarter ended 31 March 2026, USD 6,742,000,000 for the quarter ended 30 June 2026 and USD 6,910,000,000 for the quarter ended 30 June 2025.

XBRL companyfacts · 0001701605-26-000014

Net income increased from USD 402,000,000 in the quarter ended 31 March 2026 (3mo) to USD 681,000,000 in the quarter ended 30 June 2026 (3mo); those same two quarters’ revenues were USD 6,427,000,000 and USD 6,742,000,000 respectively, implying a net margin of about 6.3% in the quarter ended 31 March 2026 and about 10.1% in the quarter ended 30 June 2026 (calculated as net income / revenue for each quarter).

XBRL companyfacts · 0001701605-26-000014
OakesAI filings and risk analyst
+0.0

Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.

Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.

Which filings the desk reads

The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.

NashAI market signals analyst
no data on file

Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.

No computed signal history for this symbol yet — signals need roughly 70 trading days of price history.

EllisAI ownership and flow analyst
+0.0

Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.

As of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00, Baker Hughes Co (BKR) was a constituent holding in the IVV ETF with a weight of 0.09% of the fund.

ETF constituents · market data

The 0.09% weight in the IVV ETF equals 9 basis points of fund weight as of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00.

ETF constituents · market data
YatesAI news analyst
+1.0

Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.

Coverage reports that Baker Hughes secured an order to supply 76 NovaLT16 gas turbines to Dynamis Power Solutions for hypermobile power generation projects (order highlighted as roughly 1.3 GW of capacity in one outlet).

News · simplywall.st · 2026-09-01

A separate outlet also reported Baker Hughes agreed to supply 76 NovaLT16 gas turbines to Dynamis Power Solutions for fast-deployable, low-emissions modular power for data centers and oil & gas operations.

News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-08-29
TalbotAI insider activity analyst
no data on file

Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.

No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.

ArcherAI valuation analyst
+0.0

Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.

Trailing twelve-month free cash flow (FCF) is $1,175,000,000 and FCF per share is $1.4578.

Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD close

Trailing twelve-month EPS is negative $0.77.

Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD close

Debate and risk review

A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.

Debate1 round · 5 claims contested

A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.

The bull case

Several items in the provided evidence jointly support a favorable operational and cash-generation read: sequential quarterly net income and implied net margin improvement (fundamentals-1) is backed by stable revenue (fundamentals-0) and rising period-end assets and equity (fundamentals-4), while trailing twelve-month cash metrics show positive free cash flow and operating cash flow exceeding capex (valuation-0, valuation-3). Large reported cash on the balance sheet relative to the disclosed long-term debt line item (valuation-5) and sizable trailing EBITDA and operating income (valuation-2) strengthen the cash/coverage picture; third-party coverage showing an order for 76 NovaLT16 turbines (news-0, news-1) provides corroborating commercial activity that could underpin future revenue/cash generation. Evidence strength: the accounting and cash-flow metrics (valuation-0, valuation-2, valuation-3, fundamentals-1, fundamentals-4) are moderate-to-strong because they are sourced to financial statements and aggregated TTM calculations; the turbine order news is moderate (press coverage from multiple outlets).

The bear case

Chair's verdict, claim by claim

Coverage reports that Baker Hughes secured an order to supply 76 NovaLT16 gas turbines to Dynamis Power Solutions for hypermobile power generation projects (order highlighted as roughly 1.3 GW of capacity in one outlet).Multiple press outlets reported an order for 76 NovaLT16 turbines to Dynamis Power Solutions, supporting the claim of such coverage.upheld
A separate outlet also reported Baker Hughes agreed to supply 76 NovaLT16 gas turbines to Dynamis Power Solutions for fast-deployable, low-emissions modular power for data centers and oil & gas operations.A separate outlet similarly reported the 76 NovaLT16 turbine supply agreement, which corroborates the news coverage claim.upheld
As of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00, Baker Hughes Co (BKR) was a constituent holding in the IVV ETF with a weight of 0.09% of the fund.The claim that BKR was a constituent holding in IVV at the specified timestamp with the reported weight is supported by the ETF membership data.upheld
Risk review

Fragility · computed, not argued

balanced0.35

19 surviving claims rest on 10 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 37% of them, and 100% of what the desk raised survived the debate.

The read draws on a moderate breadth of sources but shows notable concentration risk: a single analyst thread accounts for over a third of surviving claims and everything the desk raised survived, which raises the chance that alternative interpretations were under-explored. Many claims rest on company filings and a small set of outlets, so this read is informative about reported recent history but should carry limited evidentiary weight when used to support stronger inferences.

Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers

Context

Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.

The street's viewAnalyst consensus · third-party · 2026-09-02
Buy Hold Sell Target

Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.

What this was built from

Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.

18 filings· 1 cited

SEC XBRL filings

Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.

Read by Mercer+0.4 to the score

1 holdings record

Fund holdings

Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.

Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score

5 headlines· 2 cited

News coverage

Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.

Read by Yatesnothing survived

1 computation

Valuation inputs

TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.

Read by Archercontext only

1 record· 0 cited

Company profile

Sector, industry and company details.

1 record· 0 cited

Analyst consensus

Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.

Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.

Social sentiment

Crowd chatter as an evidence stream.

Coming soon

Aggregated tone from public social feeds will join the desk as its own evidence stream — read by its own analyst, contested in the same debate, and shown with the same sourcing as every other claim. Until it earns that bar, nothing renders here.

RPT-a8d2c937evidence 00c2e067a6c6generated 9/2/2026, 10:14:13 PM · 87s13 model calls View trail

Written by AI, checked against sources

The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.

Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.

Get this for the tickers you actually hold

Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.

The full terminal on BKR Gold

Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.

Unlock

Institutional holders

Net institutional flow, Q/Q

Largest holder position

Insider buys, 90 days

Clustered insider value

Street target range

The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.

Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.