Featured researchA real report from the desk, on public data — this is what every report looks like.

CRWD

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.Evidence as of 2026-09-02

Overview · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud-delivered protection across endpoints and cloud workloads, identity, and data. It offers corporate workload security, security and vulnerability management, managed security services, IT operations management, threat intelligence services, identity protection, and log management. The company primarily sells subscriptions to its Falcon platform and cloud modules through its di…

SectorTechnology
IndustrySoftware—Infrastructure
Typeequity
ExchangeNASDAQ
Employees7,273
www.crowdstrike.com

Management team

Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.

Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.

Moneyta sentiment

Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.

Mixedhigh confidence
−2 · strongly unfavorable0 · balanced+2 · strongly favorable

+0.1 on a −2 to +2 scale.

What builds the score

Fundamentals
+0.6
Filings and risk
+0.0
Market signals
+0.2
Ownership and flow
+0.7
Insider activity
−1.0

Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.

News tonecontext · not scored+0.3 observed
3 favorable1 neutral1 unfavorableacross 4 outlets

Editor's note

Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.

GoodwinAI editor

The evidence balance is Mixed (+0.1 of a possible +2; confidence high). Gross profit rose across the quoted fiscal quarters from 814,291,000 in fiscal Q1 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-05-29) to 1,096,895,000 in fiscal Q2 2027 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-08-20). Operating losses narrowed from -124,656,000 in fiscal Q1 2025 to -33,232,000 in fiscal Q2 2027, and net income moved from -110,207,000 in fiscal Q1 2025 to positive results of 27,774,000 in fiscal Q1 2027 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-05-28) and 5,306,000 in fiscal Q2 2027.

The company’s cash and equivalents show higher balances with quarter-to-quarter fluctuation — 4,323,295,000 as of 2025-01-31 (FY 2024), 5,230,125,000 as of 2026-01-31 (FY 2026) and 5,013,847,000 as of 2026-07-31 — while long-term debt remained roughly stable near 746 million. Market signals show strong recent momentum (+119.8% over 6 months) with price above both the 50‑ and 200‑day SMAs and elevated short- and medium-term volatility; trailing twelve‑month FCF is 1,363,842,000 with P/FCF of 164.71 using the 1,023,934,842 shares reported as of 2026-08-20.

How this note was made

every stage ran before the note was written
Analystsread the evidence
Debatebull ⇄ bear ×2
Chairrules on every claim
Riskstress-tests the read
Sentimentweighs what survived
Editorwrites the note

Analyst desk

Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.

MercerAI fundamentals analyst
+0.0

Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.

Entity common shares outstanding reported as 249,248,174 as of 2025-05-29, 252,098,440 as of 2025-11-25, 254,564,820 as of 2026-05-28 and 1,023,934,842 as of 2026-08-20.

XBRL companyfacts · 0001535527-25-000019

Gross profit by fiscal quarter shows a multi-quarter increase: 814,291,000 for fiscal Q1 2025 (2025-02-01 to 2025-04-30), 858,669,000 for fiscal Q2 2026 (2025-05-01 to 2025-07-31), 926,439,000 for fiscal Q3 2026 (2025-08-01 to 2025-10-31), 1,043,352,000 for fiscal Q1 2027 (2026-02-01 to 2026-04-30) and 1,096,895,000 for fiscal Q2 2027 (2026-05-01 to 2026-07-31).

XBRL companyfacts · 0001535527-26-000031
OakesAI filings and risk analyst
+0.0

Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.

Which filings the desk reads

The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.

A Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was filed on 2026-08-27.

10-Q filed 2026-08-27

A Current Report on Form 8-K was filed on 2026-08-26 and a primary document URL is provided for that filing.

8-K filed 2026-08-26
NashAI market signals analyst
+1.0

Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.

Momentum over the most recent 6 months is +119.8% and ranks in the 98th percentile of the 547-stock research universe as of 2026-09-01.

Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-01weakened in debate

Relative strength versus SPY over 6 months is +107.5% and ranks in the 98th percentile of the 547-stock research universe as of 2026-09-01.

Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-01
EllisAI ownership and flow analyst
+0.0

Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.

As of the reporting period ended 2026-03-31, reported institutional 13F holdings total $104.7M, with Ensign Peak Advisors, Inc reported at $85.8M (value_qoq_pct -14.7) and the institutional pool showing value_qoq_pct -2.7 and two new positions added quarter-over-quarter.

13F holdings · 4 filers · as of 2026-03-31

CRWD appears as a non‑trivial but small weight in major ETFs: XLK at 0.85% of fund (timestamp 2026-09-02T01:55:42.282643+00:00), VGT at 0.63% of fund (2026-09-02T01:55:21.716957+00:00), IWF at 0.31% of fund (2026-09-02T01:53:07.496017+00:00), IVV at 0.30% of fund (2026-09-01T19:40:19.315712+00:00), SCHB 0.20% (2026-09-02T01:54:11.783435+00:00), SCHX 0.17% (2026-09-02T01:54:16.306069+00:00), and VOO 0.16% (2026-09-02T02:16:00.263763+00:00).

ETF constituents · market data
YatesAI news analyst
+1.0

Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.

Several headlines on 1 September 2026 emphasize stronger-than-expected quarterly results and rising AI-driven security demand for the company.

News · kalkinemedia.com · 2026-09-01

Multiple announcements tied to Fal.Con 2026 on 1 September 2026 describe new Falcon platform capabilities across Google Cloud's enterprise AI ecosystem, an EY partnership integrating the Falcon platform, and a new CrowdStrike SafeMind family of security models created with NVIDIA.

News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-01
TalbotAI insider activity analyst
−1.0

Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.

Multiple Form 4 filings show Kurtz George (PRESIDENT AND CEO) executed sales on 2026-08-28 and 2026-08-27 under a stated 10b5-1 plan.

Form 4 · Kurtz George (PRESIDENT AND CEO) · $93k sold · 2026-08-28

A sale reported on 2026-08-28 shows 4,160 shares sold for a value of "$905k" in the filing.

Form 4 · Kurtz George (PRESIDENT AND CEO) · $93k sold · 2026-08-28
ArcherAI valuation analyst
−1.0

Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.

The market price of $215.07 on 2026-09-01 implies an annual free-cash-flow (FCF) growth rate of 70.73% under the stated discount and terminal assumptions.

Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeweakened in debate

Price-to-free-cash-flow (P/FCF) on a trailing twelve-month basis is 164.71.

Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeweakened in debate

Debate and risk review

A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.

Debate1 round · 11 claims contested

A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.

The bull case

The evidence set contains multiple company-specific signals that jointly support a favorable read: gross profit has increased consistently quarter-to-quarter, operating losses have meaningfully narrowed and recent quarters show positive net income, and the company holds multi-billion dollar cash balances while long-term debt has remained stable. Market indicators show very strong momentum and relative strength versus the S&P over six months, and conference-driven product and partnership headlines (Fal.Con 2026, Google Cloud, EY, NVIDIA) are supported by multi-outlet coverage — all of which point to company-specific revenue/market-strength signals rather than a purely market-wide rally. Some bearish points rely on metrics that look inconsistent within the evidence package (a sudden, large jump in reported shares outstanding and valuation ratios that appear to use that inflated share base), and other negatives (elevated short-term volatility and insider plan sales) are factual but represent risk factors rather than counters to the underlying improvements in profitability and cash position. Taken together, the strongest evidence in this set supports an informational view that CrowdStrike's recent operational and cash-flow profile, plus concentrated market momentum and product/partnership news, provide a favorable informational backdrop.

The bear case

Chair's verdict, claim by claim

Several headlines on 1 September 2026 emphasize stronger-than-expected quarterly results and rising AI-driven security demand for the company.Multiple headlines dated 1 September 2026 emphasizing stronger quarterly results and AI-driven demand are present in the news feed.upheld
Multiple announcements tied to Fal.Con 2026 on 1 September 2026 describe new Falcon platform capabilities across Google Cloud's enterprise AI ecosystem, an EY partnership integrating the Falcon platform, and a new CrowdStrike SafeMind family of security models created with NVIDIA.Fal.Con 2026 product and partnership announcements with Google Cloud, EY and NVIDIA are documented across the cited news items.upheld
Momentum over the most recent 6 months is +119.8% and ranks in the 98th percentile of the 547-stock research universe as of 2026-09-01.The six‑month momentum figure is in the signals feed but the claim is flagged as describing a market‑wide condition; base‑rate context reduces its specificity to company‑unique strength.weakened
Risk review

Fragility · computed, not argued

balanced0.31

35 surviving claims rest on 18 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 20% of them, and 96% of what the desk raised survived the debate.

The surviving read is supported by a moderate diversity of sources but a non-trivial portion of the claims trace back to a single analyst, so the set can carry useful signals but is somewhat analyst-concentrated. The very high internal survival rate (96%) means few objections survived debate, which raises the chance that unchallenged assumptions persist; treat stronger, well-sourced claims as more robust and be cautious about ones tied to fewer documents.

Peer context · computed, not argued

12-1 momentum ranks 3rd of 21 in Software—Infrastructure (as of 2026-09-01).

6-month relative strength ranks 2nd of 21 in Software—Infrastructure (as of 2026-09-01).

90-day volatility ranks 11th of 21 in Software—Infrastructure (as of 2026-09-01).

dividend yield ranks 4th of 19 in Software—Infrastructure (as of 2026-09-01).

Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers

Context

Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.

The street's viewAnalyst consensus · third-party · 2026-09-01
Buy Hold Sell Target

Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.

What this was built from

Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.

15 filings· 2 cited

SEC XBRL filings

Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.

Read by Mercer+0.6 to the score

10 documents· 2 cited

SEC filing documents

The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.

Read by Oakes+0.0 to the score

1 signal set

Moneyta signal set

Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.

Read by Nash+0.2 to the score

3 holdings records· 2 cited

Fund holdings

Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.

Read by Ellis+0.7 to the score

8 headlines· 2 cited

News coverage

Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.

Read by Yatesnothing survived

2 filings· 1 cited

Insider filings

Parsed Forms 3/4/5 from EDGAR: named insiders, share counts, prices, and 10b5-1 plan state — stated and inferred flags kept apart.

Read by Talbot−1.0 to the score

1 computation

Valuation inputs

TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.

Read by Archercontext only

1 record· 0 cited

Company profile

Sector, industry and company details.

1 record· 0 cited

Analyst consensus

Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.

Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.

Social sentiment

Crowd chatter as an evidence stream.

Coming soon

Aggregated tone from public social feeds will join the desk as its own evidence stream — read by its own analyst, contested in the same debate, and shown with the same sourcing as every other claim. Until it earns that bar, nothing renders here.

RPT-7c47045bevidence 706a8a11c2c8generated 9/2/2026, 2:38:47 AM · 100s15 model calls View trail

Written by AI, checked against sources

The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.

Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.

Get this for the tickers you actually hold

Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.

The full terminal on CRWD Gold

Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.

Unlock

Institutional holders

Net institutional flow, Q/Q

Largest holder position

Insider buys, 90 days

Clustered insider value

Street target range

The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.

Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.