DELL
Dell Technologies Inc.Evidence as of 2026-10-16The desk's Snapshot
3 of 15 open to everyone · members see allRead the full desk report on DELL
Seven analysts, the debate, the risk review, every claim cited. And the same for every name you hold.
Free plan, no credit card required. Silver opens the full report, $19.99 a month. AI-written · every claim cites a source · Insight, not advice.
Overview · Dell Technologies Inc.
Dell Technologies Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, markets, sells, and supports various comprehensive and integrated solutions, products, and services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and internationally. The company operates through two segments, Infrastructure Solutions Group (ISG) and Client Solutions Group (CSG). The ISG segment provides traditional and next-generation storage solutions, inclu…
Management team
- Mr. Howard D. Elias · Chief Customer Officer and President of Services & DigitalFind on LinkedIn
- Dr. Jennifer D. Saavedra Ph.D. · Chief Human Resources OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Michael Zimmerman · Vice President of Corporate DevelopmentFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Allison Dew · Chief Marketing OfficerFind on LinkedIn
Start free to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it, not a rating or a recommendation.
−0.4 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled. The rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The evidence balance is Cautious ( −0.4 ) with high confidence. Reported revenues rose from $ 27,005,000,000 in Q3 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-10-31) to $ 43,842,000,000 in Q1 2027 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-05-01) and to $ 46,971,000,000 in Q2 2027 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-31). Gross profit and operating income climbed in the same sequence ($ 5,593,000,000 -> $ 7,782,000,000 -> $ 9,830,000,000 for gross profit; $ 2,119,000,000 -> $ 3,656,000,000 -> $ 5,385,000,000 for operating income), and net income and diluted EPS rose from $ 1,548,000,000 and $ 2.28 in Q3 2026 to $ 4,133,000,000 and $ 6.34 in Q2 2027.
Weighted-average diluted shares declined ( 680,000,000 -> 656,000,000 -> 652,000,000 ) and the company recorded $ 1,628,000,000 of repurchases in Q1 2027. At the same time, point-in-time long-term debt was higher at $ 34,466,000,000 as of 2026-07-31 versus earlier dates, stockholders’ equity remained negative across reported dates (for example −$ 1,427,000,000 as of 2026-07-31), market momentum measures are extremely strong (momentum_6m +146.3%, momentum_12_1 +349.9%), and realized volatility is very high (vol_30d_annualized +70.1%, vol_90d_annualized +76.0%).
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else (no outside knowledge, no browsing), so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC (revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter) and reports which way the trend is running.
Reported revenues rose from $27,005,000,000 in the fiscal Q3 2026 quarter (2025-08-02 to 2025-10-31, 3mo) to $43,842,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2027 (2026-01-31 to 2026-05-01, 3mo) and to $46,971,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2027 (2026-05-02 to 2026-07-31, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001571996-25-000127Gross profit increased from $5,593,000,000 in fiscal Q3 2026 to $7,782,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2027 and to $9,830,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2027 (same quarter definitions as above).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001571996-26-000046Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full: its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet; its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
Multiple Form 4 insider transaction reports were filed on 8 October 2026 (for example the 4 filed 8 October 2026) showing recent insider reporting activity.
4 filed 2026-10-08The risk-factor diff adds a disclosure that "As of January 30, 2026, our goodwill and intangible assets, net had a combined carrying value of $24.1 billion, representing approximately 24% of our total consolidated assets," highlighting the magnitude of intangible assets that are subject to periodic impairment evaluation.
Management's discussion · filed 2026-09-08Reads the signal panel above (momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta) and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
Momentum measures are extremely strong: momentum_6m is +146.3% and momentum_12_1 is +349.9%, each ranked in the 99th percentile of the 882-stock research universe on 2026-10-15.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-10-15weakened in debateShort- and medium-term realized volatility are very high: vol_30d_annualized is +70.1% and vol_90d_annualized is +76.0%, with vol_vs_own_history at the 89th percentile and rank_vol_90d at the 90th percentile of 882 on 2026-10-15.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-10-15Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
Institutional 13F-reported holdings totaled "$118.93B" as of the quarter ended 2026-06-30, with 2,146 institutional holders reported and a net increase of 489 holders quarter-over-quarter.
13F holdings · 2146 filers · as of 2026-06-30The largest reported institutional holders in the 2026-06-30 13F data include BlackRock, Inc. at "$10.40B", VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC at "$8.20B", and JANE STREET GROUP, LLC at "$7.65B".
13F holdings · 2146 filers · as of 2026-06-30Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Multiple headlines on 15 October 2026 reported a single-day tumble in Dell stock of roughly 7–8%.
News · aol.com · 2026-10-15An article on 15 October 2026 linked a mid-day ~7% share decline to reported insider selling activity.
News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-10-15Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5: who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
David Alan Kennedy, the Chief Financial Officer, reported an open-market sale of $13.5M for 23,035 shares on 2026-09-17.
Form 4 · Kennedy David Alan (Chief Financial Officer) · $13.5M sold · 2026-09-17Richard J. Rothberg, General Counsel & Secretary, reported a sale of $2.3M for 4,000 shares on 2026-09-17.
Form 4 · Rothberg Richard J (General Counsel & Secretary) · $2.3M sold · 2026-09-17Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The model reports an implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate of 0.2999 (about 29.99%) that today's price would justify under the stated discount/terminal assumptions.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closePrice-to-FCF (TTM) is 44.93 while FCF (TTM) is $6,869,000,000, implying the current price reflects roughly 45 years of trailing FCF at no growth, or equivalently a high growth/low discount input to justify the valuation.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score. The argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
The company's reported operating and profitability trajectory across the provided quarters shows material sequential improvement in revenue, gross profit, operating income, net income and diluted EPS, accompanied by declining diluted shares outstanding and recorded repurchases; these items jointly support a favorable fundamental read. Market momentum measures are extremely strong and institutional ownership is large and rising, which together indicate broad investor engagement that often accompanies company-specific operational improvement. While valuation models in the evidence require elevated growth assumptions to justify current price, the firm is generating positive trailing free cash flow and operating cash flow that materially offset headline valuation concerns when viewed as evidence of cash-generative operations. Some bearish points (rising reported debt, negative stockholders’ equity, insider selling, and expanded risk-factor language) are present in the filings, but many are accounting or disclosure characteristics (large intangible/goodwill balances and risk disclosures) or concentrated, time-bound transactions (insider filings) rather than direct counter-evidence to the reported multi-quarter profit and cash-flow expansion.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
diversified0.29
39 surviving claims rest on 21 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 18% of them, and 99% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The read is moderately resilient: 39 surviving claims draw on 21 distinct sources, so multiple independent documents underpin the set, but a single analyst still contributes a meaningful share. The very high debate-survival rate (99%) means the desk treated these points as durable within its process, yet source concentration and analyst-weight suggest some claims should carry caution when used as high-confidence inputs.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 1st of 8 in Computer Hardware (as of 2026-10-15).
90-day volatility ranks 6th of 8 in Computer Hardware (as of 2026-10-15).
dividend yield ranks 2nd of 8 in Computer Hardware (as of 2026-10-15).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment. When the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here (no outside knowledge, no browsing), and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
8 filings· 2 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data, not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.7 to the score
12 documents· 2 cited
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes−0.8 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash−0.4 to the score
3 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.8 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
15 filings· 2 cited
Insider filings
Parsed Forms 3/4/5 from EDGAR: named insiders, share counts, prices, and 10b5-1 plan state, with stated and inferred flags kept apart.
Read by Talbot−0.8 to the score
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only; it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal; the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
The full terminal on DELL Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Get this for the names you actually hold
Every name in your portfolio, researched the same way, plus the one thing no sample can show: how each one sits inside what you already own.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.