DELL
Evidence as of 2026-09-02Overview · Dell Technologies Inc.
Dell Technologies Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, markets, sells, and supports various comprehensive and integrated solutions, products, and services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and internationally. The company operates through two segments, Infrastructure Solutions Group (ISG) and Client Solutions Group (CSG). The ISG segment provides traditional and next-generation storage solutions, inclu…
Management team
- Mr. Howard D. Elias · Chief Customer Officer and President of Services & DigitalFind on LinkedIn
- Dr. Jennifer D. Saavedra Ph.D. · Chief Human Resources OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Michael Zimmerman · Vice President of Corporate DevelopmentFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Allison Dew · Chief Marketing OfficerFind on LinkedIn
Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.3 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
Revenues in the fiscal quarter ended 2026-05-01 (fiscal Q1 2027) were $ 43,842,000,000, up from $ 23,378,000,000 in the comparable fiscal quarter ended 2025-05-02 (fiscal Q1 2026). Gross profit expanded to $ 7,782,000,000 from $ 4,937,000,000 year over year, operating income rose to $ 3,656,000,000 from $ 1,165,000,000, and diluted EPS increased to $ 5.24 from $ 1.37 in the like quarter.
The company shows active capital returns alongside a lower share count — diluted shares fell to 656,000,000 from 702,000,000 and buybacks were $ 1,628,000,000 in the quarter. Balance-sheet items show long-term debt of $ 31,161,000,000 and cash of $ 11,578,000,000 (implying net debt ~ $ 19,583,000,000), trailing‑twelve‑month free cash flow of $ 6.869 billion and valuation multiples with P/FCF ~ 40.59 and P/E ~ 40.13.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenues for the fiscal quarter ended 1 May 2026 (fiscal Q1 2027, 2026-01-31 to 2026-05-01) were $43,842,000,000, up from $23,378,000,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 2 May 2025 (fiscal Q1 2027, 2025-02-01 to 2025-05-02).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001571996-26-000030Gross profit for the fiscal quarter ended 1 May 2026 (fiscal Q1 2027) was $7,782,000,000 versus $4,937,000,000 in the comparable fiscal quarter ended 2 May 2025, indicating margin expansion in that quarter on an absolute gross-profit basis.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001571996-26-000030Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
A Form 4 for the company was filed on 2026-08-26.
4 filed 2026-08-26The provided Form 4 record has parse_status marked as "skipped", so the submission's transaction details are not available in the provided evidence.
4 filed 2026-08-26Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
Momentum over the past 6 months is +194.1% and ranks in the 100th percentile of the 547-stock research universe as of 2026-09-01.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-01weakened in debateRelative strength versus SPY is +181.8% over 6 months and +233.3% over 12 months, with the 6-month relative-strength rank in the 100th percentile of 547 as of 2026-09-01.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-01weakened in debateReads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 2026-03-31, reported 13F institutional holdings totalled $17.0M across 2 holders, with one new position and one exited position versus the prior quarter and a quarter-over-quarter reported value change of -14.6%.
13F holdings · 2 filers · as of 2026-03-31Dakota Wealth Management was the largest reported 13F holder in that filing with a reported value of $12.1M (noted as not new), and GAM Holding AG appeared as a new reported holder with $4.9M.
13F holdings · 2 filers · as of 2026-03-31Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Multiple outlets report that Dell Technologies posted record fiscal 2027 second-quarter revenue and earnings, citing accelerating demand for AI servers, data-center infrastructure, storage and commercial PCs.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-02Distinct news outlets repeated the same earnings-theme language — reporting record fiscal 2027 second-quarter results and strong AI-related momentum — appearing in at least Yahoo Finance, The Lincolnian Online, Zacks and other syndications.
News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-09-02Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
A sale totaling "$886k" for "2022" shares by Radakovich Lynn Vojvodich (Director) was reported on 24 August 2026 and the filing states a "10b5-1 plan (stated on the filing)".
Form 4 · Radakovich Lynn Vojvodich (Director) · $63k code M · 2026-08-24An entry showing "$63k" for "2022" shares by Radakovich Lynn Vojvodich (Director) on 24 August 2026 is reported with action "code M" and the filing states a "10b5-1 plan (stated on the filing)".
Form 4 · Radakovich Lynn Vojvodich (Director) · $63k code M · 2026-08-24Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The model reports an implied free-cash-flow growth rate of 27.19% that today's price would justify under the stated discount and terminal assumptions.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closePrice-to-free-cash-flow (P/FCF) on the trailing twelve months is 40.59
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
The provided evidence shows large sequential and year-over-year fundamental improvement: revenue more than doubled in the referenced quarter with gross profit, operating income and diluted EPS rising materially while diluted shares declined via buybacks. Market signals and media coverage corroborate that this quarter’s results were widely reported as record revenue/earnings with specific callouts to AI server and data-center demand, and the stock’s momentum and relative strength metrics are exceptionally strong versus the research universe. Trailing operating cash flow and free cash flow are material in absolute terms, and shareholder-return activity reduced the share base, amplifying per‑share metrics. Together these company-level operational improvements, the visible market reaction, and significant momentum constitute a favorable composite read of the supplied evidence.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.39
38 surviving claims rest on 13 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 18% of them, and 95% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The read rests on a moderate breadth of sources but with noticeable concentration: a single analyst supplies nearly a fifth of surviving claims, and a small set of documents (notably the latest 10‑Q and a few computed signal feeds) underpin many core facts. The high debate-survival rate means the desk’s findings were little-challenged internally, which raises the possibility of correlated assumptions or limited counter-evidence rather than robust, independent corroboration. Given the mixture of primary filings for fundamentals and thinner items (skipped Form 4 parsing, computed signals, syndicated news), treat the narrative as informational but sensitive to a small number of documents changing.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 1st of 4 in Computer Hardware (as of 2026-09-01).
6-month relative strength ranks 1st of 4 in Computer Hardware (as of 2026-09-01).
90-day volatility ranks 2nd of 4 in Computer Hardware (as of 2026-09-01).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
12 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+1.1 to the score
1 document
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes+0.0 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash+0.4 to the score
3 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.4 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 filing
Insider filings
Parsed Forms 3/4/5 from EDGAR: named insiders, share counts, prices, and 10b5-1 plan state — stated and inferred flags kept apart.
Read by Talbot−0.5 to the score
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on DELL Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.