DOV
DOVER CorpEvidence as of 2026-09-02Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.4 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The evidence balance is Mixed (+0.4 of a possible +2; was +0.4 before debate) · confidence high. Revenue rose from $ 1,866,059,000 in Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-17) to $ 2,190,021,000 in Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-17). Gross profit moved from $ 745,500,000 to $ 880,606,000 and operating income from $ 296,309,000 to $ 391,787,000 across the same two reported quarters; net income increased from $ 230,821,000 to $ 312,246,000 and diluted EPS from $ 1.67 to $ 2.30.
Weighted‑average diluted shares outstanding declined from 138,260,000 in Q1 2026 to 135,553,000 in Q2 2026, with point‑in‑time shares outstanding noted at 134,680,225 as of 2026-07-17. Long‑term debt was $ 3,068,413,000 as of 2025-06-30 and $ 3,259,988,000 as of 2026-06-30; total assets rose from $ 13,161,284,000 as of 2025-06-30 to $ 13,694,216,000 as of 2026-06-30, and stockholders’ equity increased from $ 7,137,767,000 as of 2025-03-31 to $ 7,704,004,000 as of 2026-06-30. Valuation metrics in the packet include trailing P/E 22.87 (EPS TTM = 8.26), price‑to‑FCF (TTM) 62.1 with FCF per share 3.0418, EV/EBITDA (TTM) 15.39 and EBITDA (TTM) 1,816,523,000; implied FCF growth consistent with today’s price is 0.3925 (39.25%). Market capitalization is $ 25,441,094,502 and enterprise value $ 27,961,938,502 with cash of $ 739,144,000 and long‑term debt of $ 3,259,988,000.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue for the three months ending 2025-03-31 (reported as "Q1 2026 (2025-01-01 to 2025-03-31, 3mo)") was $1,866,059,000 and rose to $2,190,021,000 in the three months ending 2026-06-30 ("Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo)").
XBRL companyfacts · 0000029905-26-000015weakened in debateGross profit was $745,500,000 for the three months ending 2025-03-31 ("Q1 2026 (2025-01-01 to 2025-03-31, 3mo)") and was $880,606,000 for the three months ending 2026-06-30 ("Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo)").
XBRL companyfacts · 0000029905-26-000015weakened in debateReads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
No computed signal history for this symbol yet — signals need roughly 70 trading days of price history.
Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00, DOV is held in the ETF with symbol IVV at a weight of 0.05% of that fund.
ETF constituents · market dataThe provided evidence documents ETF-level exposure only (a reported weight percent in IVV) and contains no additional ownership breakdowns or insider filing events.
ETF constituents · market dataReads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Multiple outlets ran pieces noting a recent price drop of 9.5% over four weeks and arguing the shares are in technically oversold territory (article framed as a possible trend reversal), published 2 September 2026.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-02A second outlet syndicated the same technical/trend-reversal framing on 2 September 2026, showing that this technical-angle story appeared in more than one separate outlet.
News · zacks.com · 2026-09-02Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate today's price would justify is 0.3925 (39.25%).
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeweakened in debatePrice-to-FCF (TTM) is 62.1, and FCF per share (TTM) is 3.0418.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
The company filings show clear quarter-to-quarter improvements in top-line and profitability metrics: revenue, gross profit, operating income, net income, and diluted EPS all rose from the Q1 to Q2 periods reported, and shares outstanding declined which amplifies per-share results — these are direct, high-strength filings. Balance sheet evidence shows growth in total assets and stockholders' equity over the 12-month span (moderate-strength filing evidence), and company disclosures and press coverage document a recently declared cash dividend and an 'Innovation Lab' product initiative (news sources of moderate strength). The bear case focusing on high implied FCF growth and elevated Price-to-FCF rests on valuation-model outputs that are sensitive to inputs and appear weakly informative without further context; likewise, short-term technical headlines about a recent price drop are market-noise items of low fundamental strength compared with the company-reported operating improvements. Taken together, the strongest evidence supports an operational improvement narrative (high-strength filing data) and corporate actions that support shareholder returns and product development (moderate-strength news/evidence).
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.36
20 surviving claims rest on 11 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 35% of them, and 85% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The surviving read is moderately concentrated: 20 claims draw from 11 sources and one analyst supplies 35% of the surviving points, so a few voices and documents carry outsized influence. High survival through debate (85%) means the desk largely retained its initial signals, but source concentration and analyst dependence reduce how much weight to place on any single claim.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
12 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.8 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on DOV Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.