Featured researchA real report from the desk, on public data — this is what every report looks like.

DUK

Duke Energy CorporationEvidence as of 2026-09-02

Moneyta sentiment

Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.

Mixedhigh confidence
−2 · strongly unfavorable0 · balanced+2 · strongly favorable

+0.3 on a −2 to +2 scale.

What builds the score

Fundamentals
+0.5
Ownership and flow
+0.0

Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.

News tonecontext · not scored+0.6 observed
3 favorable2 neutral0 unfavorableacross 3 outlets

Editor's note

Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.

GoodwinAI editor

The desk rates the evidence balance as Mixed (+ 0.2 of a possible + 2; confidence high). Common shares outstanding rose from 776,461,008 as of 2025-01-31 to 779,596,217 as of 2026-04-30. Diluted EPS by quarter was USD 1.76 in Q1 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-04-30), USD 1.25 in Q2 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-07-31), USD 1.81 in Q3 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-10-31), and USD 1.97 in fiscal Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-30).

Net income moved from USD 1,379,000,000 in Q1 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-04-30) to USD 984,000,000 in Q2 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-07-31), USD 1,421,000,000 in Q3 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-10-31), and USD 1,550,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-30). Operating income was USD 2,343,000,000 in Q1 2025, USD 1,830,000,000 in Q2 2025, USD 2,334,000,000 in Q3 2025, and USD 2,725,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026. Reported long-term noncurrent debt rose from USD 76,340,000,000 as of 2024-12-31 to USD 80,477,000,000 as of 2026-03-31 while cash and cash equivalents increased from USD 314,000,000 to USD 2,140,000,000 over the same snapshot dates.

How this note was made

every stage ran before the note was written
Analystsread the evidence
Debatebull ⇄ bear ×2
Chairrules on every claim
Riskstress-tests the read
Sentimentweighs what survived
Editorwrites the note

Analyst desk

Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.

MercerAI fundamentals analyst
+1.0

Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.

Entity common shares outstanding increased from 776,461,008 shares as of 2025-01-31 to 779,596,217 shares as of 2026-04-30.

XBRL companyfacts · 0001326160-25-000072

Diluted earnings per share by quarter: USD 1.76 in Q1 2025 (2025-01-01 to 2025-03-31, 3mo), USD 1.25 in Q2 2025 (2025-04-01 to 2025-06-30, 3mo), USD 1.81 in Q3 2025 (2025-07-01 to 2025-09-30, 3mo), and USD 1.97 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo).

XBRL companyfacts · 0001326160-25-000150
OakesAI filings and risk analyst
+0.0

Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.

Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.

Which filings the desk reads

The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.

NashAI market signals analyst
no data on file

Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.

No computed signal history for this symbol yet — signals need roughly 70 trading days of price history.

EllisAI ownership and flow analyst
+0.0

Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.

As of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00, DUK had a membership weight in the IVV ETF equal to 0.15% of that fund.

ETF constituents · market data

The provided ETF membership record is timestamped 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00, indicating the data point's reporting time.

ETF constituents · market data
YatesAI news analyst
+1.0

Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.

Several recent pieces emphasize a large multi-year capital program and grid buildout tied to rising contracted computing (data center) load across the Carolinas and Midwest.

News · kalkinemedia.com · 2026-09-02

Coverage notes Duke Energy scaling back a North Carolina rate proposal while data center demand is reshaping capital plans across its Southeast and Midwest territory.

News · kalkinemedia.com · 2026-09-02
TalbotAI insider activity analyst
no data on file

Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.

No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.

ArcherAI valuation analyst
−1.0

Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.

Trailing twelve-month free cash flow (FCF) was negative $5,944,000,000.

Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD close

Free cash flow per share on a trailing twelve-month basis was negative $7.6303.

Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD close

Debate and risk review

A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.

Debate1 round · 5 claims contested

A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.

The bull case

Several company-specific operating and earnings metrics point toward a favorable operational read: quarterly operating income and net income moved higher in the most recent comparable quarters and diluted EPS rose to $1.97 in fiscal Q1 2026, indicating improved per-share profitability on a recent-quarter basis. News items consistently report a large multi-year capital program tied to rising contracted data-center load, which provides a clear rationale for elevated capex and infrastructure investment. Although trailing twelve-month free cash flow is negative, that outcome is traceable to capex exceeding operating cash flow rather than deteriorating operating performance; cash and cash equivalents also increased materially over the period. Valuation multiples (P/E 17.76 and EV/EBITDA 11.42) are consistent with an enterprise not trading at an extreme premium, which, together with rising earnings and a defined growth-related capex program, jointly support a favorable operational and valuation read.

The bear case

Chair's verdict, claim by claim

Several recent pieces emphasize a large multi-year capital program and grid buildout tied to rising contracted computing (data center) load across the Carolinas and Midwest.Multiple news items cited describe a multi-year capital program and grid buildout tied to data‑center load; the claim is a supported summary.upheld
Coverage notes Duke Energy scaling back a North Carolina rate proposal while data center demand is reshaping capital plans across its Southeast and Midwest territory.Coverage noting a scaled-back North Carolina rate proposal and data‑center effects on capital plans is reflected in the cited media item.upheld
As of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00, DUK had a membership weight in the IVV ETF equal to 0.15% of that fund.The ETF membership record timestamped as shown reports a 0.15% weight for DUK in IVV; this is a direct data point.upheld
Risk review

Fragility · computed, not argued

balanced0.34

19 surviving claims rest on 10 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 32% of them, and 97% of what the desk raised survived the debate.

Evidence underlying these 19 surviving claims draws from a moderate number of distinct sources, but a single analyst carries about a third of the claims and the team preserved 97% of what it raised. That pattern raises caution: the read has reasonable source breadth yet meaningful analyst dependence, so the desk-level consensus is informative but not robust against new or contradictory filings.

Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers

Context

Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.

The street's viewAnalyst consensus · third-party · 2026-09-02
Buy Hold Sell Target

Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.

What this was built from

Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.

14 filings· 2 cited

SEC XBRL filings

Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.

Read by Mercer+0.5 to the score

1 holdings record

Fund holdings

Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.

Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score

8 headlines· 2 cited

News coverage

Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.

Read by Yatesnothing survived

1 computation

Valuation inputs

TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.

Read by Archercontext only

1 record· 0 cited

Company profile

Sector, industry and company details.

1 record· 0 cited

Analyst consensus

Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.

Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.

Social sentiment

Crowd chatter as an evidence stream.

Coming soon

Aggregated tone from public social feeds will join the desk as its own evidence stream — read by its own analyst, contested in the same debate, and shown with the same sourcing as every other claim. Until it earns that bar, nothing renders here.

RPT-4b1239e1evidence 524d2e12256egenerated 9/2/2026, 11:12:53 PM · 96s13 model calls View trail

Written by AI, checked against sources

The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.

Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.

Get this for the tickers you actually hold

Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.

The full terminal on DUK Gold

Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.

Unlock

Institutional holders

Net institutional flow, Q/Q

Largest holder position

Insider buys, 90 days

Clustered insider value

Street target range

The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.

Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.