Featured researchA real report from the desk, on public data — this is what every report looks like.

ECHO

Evidence as of 2026-09-02

Moneyta sentiment

Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.

Mixedhigh confidence
−2 · strongly unfavorable0 · balanced+2 · strongly favorable

+0.0 on a −2 to +2 scale.

What builds the score

Fundamentals
+0.0
Ownership and flow
+0.0

Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.

News tonecontext · not scored+0.2 observed
2 favorable2 neutral2 unfavorableacross 3 outlets

Editor's note

Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.

GoodwinAI editor

Evidence balance: Mixed; confidence high. Revenue for the fiscal quarter ended 2025-03-31 (Q1 2025) was 3,869,758,000 USD, for the fiscal quarter ended 2025-06-30 (Q2 2025) was 3,724,959,000 USD, and for the fiscal quarter ended 2025-09-30 (Q3 2025) was 3,614,258,000 USD. Operating income was negative 88,132,000 USD in Q1 2025 and negative 213,408,000 USD in Q2 2025, while operating income was 392,847,000 USD for the fiscal quarter ended 2026-03-31 (Q1 2026) and 512,938,000 USD for the fiscal quarter ended 2026-06-30 (Q2 2026).

Net income shows large swings: negative 202,669,000 USD in Q1 2025, negative 306,132,000 USD in Q2 2025, negative 12,781,196,000 USD in Q3 2025, negative 146,885,000 USD in Q1 2026, and positive 8,462,372,000 USD in Q2 2026. Trailing twelve‑month free cash flow is 8,490,000 USD (FCF per share ttm 0.0241), producing a price/FCF of 3,590.35 at the reported share price of 86.69 (price date 2026-09-02). Trailing operating cash flow is 1,686,245,000 USD with capex 1,677,755,000 USD (ttm), leaving the small positive FCF above, while trailing net income per share (EPS ttm) is -21.82 and trailing operating income (ttm) is -15,949,498,000 USD.

How this note was made

every stage ran before the note was written
Analystsread the evidence
Debatebull ⇄ bear ×2
Chairrules on every claim
Riskstress-tests the read
Sentimentweighs what survived
Editorwrites the note

Analyst desk

Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.

MercerAI fundamentals analyst
+0.0

Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.

Revenue was 3,869,758,000 USD for the fiscal quarter ended 2025-03-31.

XBRL companyfacts · 0001558370-25-007050

Revenue was 3,724,959,000 USD for the fiscal quarter ended 2025-06-30.

XBRL companyfacts · 0001558370-25-009923
OakesAI filings and risk analyst
+0.0

Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.

Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.

Which filings the desk reads

The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.

NashAI market signals analyst
no data on file

Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.

No computed signal history for this symbol yet — signals need roughly 70 trading days of price history.

EllisAI ownership and flow analyst
+0.0

Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.

As of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00, the ETF iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) held ECHO at 0.02% of the fund.

ETF constituents · market data

The provided ownership snapshot is dated 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00 (the timestamp of the membership record).

ETF constituents · market data
YatesAI news analyst
+0.0

Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.

The New Mexico Educational Retirement Board purchased 6,700 shares of Echostar in the 2nd quarter, valued at roughly $680,000.

News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-09-02

Van ECK Associates Corp acquired 1,369,499 shares of Echostar in the 2nd quarter, per its 13F filing.

News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-08-29
TalbotAI insider activity analyst
no data on file

Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.

No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.

ArcherAI valuation analyst
−2.0

Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.

The share price used is 86.69 as of price date 2026-09-02.

Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD close

Trailing twelve‑month free cash flow (FCF) is 8,490,000 and FCF per share (ttm) is 0.0241, producing a price/FCF of 3,590.35 at the given price.

Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD close

Debate and risk review

A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.

Debate1 round · 6 claims contested

A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.

The bull case

Several claims together present a more favorable operational and investor-interest picture than the negative headlines imply. Operating income swung from negative in 2025 quarters to materially positive in the 2026 March and June quarters, and the reported net income for the quarter ended 2026-06-30 is strongly positive, indicating that recent accounting-period results include a marked earnings improvement. Trailing twelve‑month cash flow data show a small positive free cash flow, and institution-level buys (VanEck, New Mexico ERB) plus an index fund holding indicate some demand from professional investors. These items suggest that company-level cash generation and recent operating performance materially differ from the worse accounting/valuation snapshots, which rely heavily on prior-period charges and headline losses.

The bear case

Chair's verdict, claim by claim

The New Mexico Educational Retirement Board purchased 6,700 shares of Echostar in the 2nd quarter, valued at roughly $680,000.The New Mexico Educational Retirement Board purchase and approximate value are reported in the cited news item.upheld
Van ECK Associates Corp acquired 1,369,499 shares of Echostar in the 2nd quarter, per its 13F filing.The VanEck 13F acquisition of 1,369,499 shares is recorded in the cited filing-based news item.upheld
As of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00, the ETF iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) held ECHO at 0.02% of the fund.The ETF holding (IVV at 0.02%) is a direct snapshot from the supplied membership data.upheld
Risk review

Fragility · computed, not argued

balanced0.32

20 surviving claims rest on 11 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 30% of them, and 98% of what the desk raised survived the debate.

The evidence base is moderately broad but not robust: 20 surviving claims come from 11 sources, so many claims share source coverage, and one analyst contributes nearly a third of the surviving claims — that creates concentration risk. Because 98% of the desk’s points survived debate, the surviving claims are internally consistent, but analyst dependence and limited source diversity mean each claim should carry cautious weight when used in broader inferences.

Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers

Context

Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.

The street's viewAnalyst consensus · third-party
Buy Hold Sell Target

Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.

What this was built from

Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.

13 filings· 2 cited

SEC XBRL filings

Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.

Read by Mercer+0.0 to the score

1 holdings record

Fund holdings

Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.

Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score

8 headlines· 2 cited

News coverage

Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.

Read by Yatesnothing survived

1 computation

Valuation inputs

TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.

Read by Archercontext only

Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.

Social sentiment

Crowd chatter as an evidence stream.

Coming soon

Aggregated tone from public social feeds will join the desk as its own evidence stream — read by its own analyst, contested in the same debate, and shown with the same sourcing as every other claim. Until it earns that bar, nothing renders here.

RPT-6ecdae26evidence 24ca006a71c7generated 9/2/2026, 11:18:36 PM · 95s13 model calls View trail

Written by AI, checked against sources

The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.

Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.

Get this for the tickers you actually hold

Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.

The full terminal on ECHO Gold

Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.

Unlock

Institutional holders

Net institutional flow, Q/Q

Largest holder position

Insider buys, 90 days

Clustered insider value

Street target range

The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.

Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.