EMR
Emerson Electric Co.Evidence as of 2026-09-02Overview · Emerson Electric Co.
Emerson Electric Co., a technology and engineering company, provides various solutions for customers in industrial, commercial, and consumer markets in the Americas, Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and Europe. The company operates through Automation Solutions, AspenTech, and Commercial & Residential Solutions segments. The Automation Solutions segment offers measurement and analytical instrumentation, industrial valve…
Management team
- Mr. Nick J. Piazza · Senior VP & Chief People OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Vidya Ramnath · Senior VP & Chief Marketing OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Lisa A. Flavin · Senior VP, Chief Transformation & Chief Compliance OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Peter Zornio · Senior VP & CTOFind on LinkedIn
Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.5 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The evidence balance is Constructive (+0.5 of a possible +2; confidence high). Revenue and profitability trends across the most recent reported quarters are intact: revenue rose to $ 4,873,000,000 in fiscal Q3 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-06-30) from $ 4,562,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-03-31) and $ 4,343,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-12-31). Net income also increased sequentially from $ 605,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 to $ 618,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 and $ 718,000,000 in fiscal Q3 2026.
Share-count and balance-sheet items reported survived the review: weighted-average diluted shares fell to 561,100,000 by fiscal Q3 2026 from 571,100,000 in fiscal Q1 2025, and long-term noncurrent debt declined from $ 8,319,000,000 as of 2025-09-30 to $ 7,526,000,000 as of 2026-06-30. Market and valuation metrics in the packet include a beta versus SPY of 1.57 (correlation 0.62), an active golden cross present for 70 days, elevated 30- and 90-day volatility near 33%, trailing P/FCF of 41.56, trailing P/E of 32.73 (trailing EPS 4.51), enterprise value $ 86,546,014,000 and market cap $ 82,348,014,000, and model-implied FCF growth of 27.84% that today’s price would justify under the stated assumptions.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue in the most recent fiscal quarter, fiscal Q3 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30), was $4,873,000,000, up from $4,562,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31) and $4,343,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2025-10-01 to 2025-12-31).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000032604-26-000043Net income increased across the last three reported quarters: $605,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2025-10-01 to 2025-12-31), $618,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31), and $718,000,000 in fiscal Q3 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000032604-26-000043Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
A Form 3 with the 3 filed 25 August 2026 was filed on 2026-08-25 for the company.
3 filed 2026-08-25weakened in debateA Form 3 with the 3 filed 25 August 2026 was filed on 2026-08-25 for the company.
3 filed 2026-08-25weakened in debateReads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
EMR's beta versus SPY is 1.57 and its correlation with SPY is 0.62 on 2026-09-01.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-01Short- and medium-term momentum are positive: momentum_3m is +3.9% and momentum_6m is +1.1%, with the 6-month momentum at the 40th percentile of the 547-name universe.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-01weakened in debateReads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
13F filings carry a 45-day reporting lag, so the institutional holdings data is the latest reported quarter, not a real-time book.
13F holdings · 4 filers · as of 2026-03-31Institutional 13F-reported total value was "$65.5M" as of the period 2026-03-31, with 4 reporting holders.
13F holdings · 4 filers · as of 2026-03-31Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
A headline flagged a 3.2% recent decline and compared a GF Value of $134.92 with a price of $147.63 for Emerson Electric Co.
News · gurufocus.com · 2026-09-01Two headlines from Zacks and Yahoo Finance question whether Emerson Electric is outperforming other industrial products stocks so far this year, framing coverage as relative performance within the sector.
News · zacks.com · 2026-09-01Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The model-implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate that today's price would justify, under the stated discount and terminal assumptions, is 27.84% (0.2784).
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closePrice to trailing twelve-month free cash flow (P/FCF) is 41.56.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
The provided company-specific fundamentals collectively support a favorable read: revenue and net income each rose across the last three reported quarters (fundamentals-0, fundamentals-1), diluted EPS increased (fundamentals-2) while weighted average diluted shares have trended lower and there is documented repurchase activity (fundamentals-3, fundamentals-4), and long-term debt declined between balance dates (fundamentals-5). Market technicals add corroborating positive signals: short- and medium-term momentum are positive and a golden cross has been in place for 70 days (market-1, market-2), and the company is held across multiple large ETFs (ownership-3) which supports broad passive exposure. These company-level improvements mitigate some concerns raised by headline valuation and volatility metrics: high trailing P/E and P/FCF and an implied FCF growth rate (valuation-0, valuation-1, valuation-2) reflect price level relative to recent cash flow, but the earnings and cash-return actions in the recent quarters strengthen the case that fundamentals, not just market-wide factors, are driving valuation tension. In rebuttal to bear points about elevated volatility and drawdowns (market-3, market-5) and a recent price comparison flagged in a headline (news-0), note that elevated volatility coexists with improving income and buyback activity and that technical momentum is positive; financial advisors often point out that volatility and drawdowns are risk characteristics to be assessed alongside operational progress rather than automatic disqualifiers.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.35
31 surviving claims rest on 14 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 19% of them, and 90% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The read rests on a moderate breadth of sources but not a large one; 14 distinct sources for 31 claims gives some cross-checking, yet the single heaviest analyst carrying nearly a fifth of surviving claims creates a non-trivial dependence on a small number of voices. A 90% survival rate through debate indicates the desk largely retained its initial observations, which raises confidence in internal consistency but also suggests the set may be conservatively curated rather than widely challenged; treat the bundle as informative but not indisputable without further external corroboration.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 5th of 8 in Specialty Industrial Machinery (as of 2026-09-01).
6-month relative strength ranks 2nd of 8 in Specialty Industrial Machinery (as of 2026-09-01).
90-day volatility ranks 5th of 8 in Specialty Industrial Machinery (as of 2026-09-01).
dividend yield ranks 3rd of 8 in Specialty Industrial Machinery (as of 2026-09-01).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
16 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+1.6 to the score
2 documents
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes+0.0 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash−0.4 to the score
2 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.9 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on EMR Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.