EQT
EQT CorpEvidence as of 2026-09-02Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
−0.3 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
What the evidence shows
The surviving evidence paints a mixed picture (evidence balance: Mixed, −0.3 of a possible +2; confidence high). Revenue fell from $ 3,378,736,000 in Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-14) to $ 1,809,944,000 in Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-14), operating income compressed from $ 2,035,962,000 to $ 394,038,000 across the same quarters, and net income declined from $ 1,487,229,000 to $ 211,425,000. At the same time reported long-term debt decreased from $ 7,800,328,000 as of 2025-12-31 to $ 5,655,714,000 as of 2026-06-30, trailing twelve‑month free cash flow is $ 5,487,238,900 (FCF per share $ 8.7231), and valuation multiples on the price date 2026-09-02 are low (P/FCF 6.39, EV/EBITDA 5.92, trailing P/E 12.31).
What the debate changed
Nothing substantive was dropped or weakened in the desk discussion; 100% of what the analysts raised survived the debate. The argument clarified that the packet contains contemporaneous quarter-to-quarter P&L and balance-sheet snapshots plus valuation outputs, but the team did not change the core read that revenue and earnings showed material intra‑year compression while debt and cash point-in-time figures moved in the opposite direction.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue fell from $3,378,736,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) to $1,809,944,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000033213-26-000030Operating income compressed from $2,035,962,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) to $394,038,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000033213-26-000030Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
No computed signal history for this symbol yet — signals need roughly 70 trading days of price history.
Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
EQT is a constituent of the ETF with symbol IVV at a weight of 0.05% of that fund, as reported in the etf_membership record.
ETF constituents · market dataThe ETF membership entry for EQT is timestamped 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00 in the provided etf_membership data.
ETF constituents · market dataReads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
An earnings presentation transcript for Full Year 2026 was published on 2026-09-02.
News · gurufocus.com · 2026-09-02Corient Private Wealth LP purchased 115,098 shares of the company during the second quarter, valued at approximately $6,119,000, according to the report.
News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-09-01Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The model shows an implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate of -16.42% per year as of the price on 2026-09-02.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeTrailing twelve‑month free cash flow is $5,487,238,900 and free cash flow per share is $8.7231 in the provided dataset.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Several items in the evidence jointly support a favorable read: the company materially reduced reported long‑term debt between year‑end 2025 and mid‑2026 (fundamentals-3), trailing twelve‑month free cash flow is large on an absolute and per‑share basis (valuation-1), and common valuation multiples are low (valuation-2), which together are consistent with a financially stronger balance sheet and a market price that appears inexpensive on standard metrics. Institutional buying activity during the quarter (news-1, news-2) and completion of strategic transactions and combinations (news-6, news-7) add transactional validation to the operational picture. These points counterbalance the single‑quarter declines in revenue, operating income, and net income (fundamentals-0, fundamentals-1, fundamentals-2) by showing deleveraging and strong trailing cash generation; the dataset itself flags the picture as mixed (valuation-4), and that characterization is supported by high‑strength evidence for debt reduction and low multiples but medium‑strength evidence for quarter‑to‑quarter earnings swings. The implied negative FCF growth rate (valuation-0) is present in the dataset but is of weaker evidentiary weight relative to the large reported trailing FCF and low multiples, so the overall evidence set supports a constructive interpretation of the company’s balance sheet and valuation while acknowledging mixed near‑term operating signals.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.30
21 surviving claims rest on 13 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 38% of them, and 100% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The read has moderate breadth (21 surviving claims from 13 distinct sources) but meaningful concentration: one analyst accounts for 38% of the surviving claims, which raises single-analyst dependence. Additionally, a 100% survival rate in debate means the desk did not discard any claims — that strengthens internal consistency but also indicates the set of claims may be brittle to a small number of new counter-evidence items.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
11 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer−0.7 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on EQT Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.