ES
Eversource EnergyEvidence as of 2026-09-02Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.1 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The surviving evidence establishes a mixed picture. Revenues and operating income display a recurring seasonal pattern with revenues of $ 4,118,355,000 in Q1 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-04-30), $ 2,838,068,000 in Q2 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-07-31), $ 3,220,625,000 in Q3 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-10-31), $ 4,504,363,000 in Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-30) and $ 2,903,189,000 in Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-31). Operating income follows that cadence with $ 926,394,000 (Q1 2025), $ 663,049,000 (Q2 2025), $ 688,682,000 (Q3 2025), $ 1,076,148,000 (Q1 2026) and $ 540,874,000 (Q2 2026).
Earnings per share show notable quarter-to-quarter volatility, including diluted EPS of $ 1.50 (Q1 2025), $ 0.96 (Q2 2025), $ 0.99 (Q3 2025), $ 1.61 (Q1 2026) and $ 0.14 (Q2 2026). Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding have risen gradually to 376,998,879 in the three months ended 2026-06-30, and point-in-time common shares outstanding increased from 367,384,808 as of 2025-04-30 to 376,674,754 as of 2026-07-31. Cash and cash equivalents increased materially to $ 1,819,319,000 as of 2026-06-30 from $ 270,200,000 as of 2026-03-31. Valuation metrics recorded in the packet show a trailing twelve-month P/E of 19.04, EV/EBITDA of 9.93 on trailing EBITDA of $ 5,169,953,000, trailing free cash flow of - $ 1,417,892,000 (FCF per share - 3.761), market-cap of $ 26,532,969,672 and enterprise value of $ 51,322,640,672, implying material leverage.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenues show a recurring seasonal pattern with Q1 (three months ended 2025-03-31) = $4,118,355,000, Q2 (2025-04-01 to 2025-06-30) = $2,838,068,000, Q3 (2025-07-01 to 2025-09-30) = $3,220,625,000, Q1 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31) = $4,504,363,000 and Q2 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30) = $2,903,189,000.
XBRL companyfacts · 0000072741-25-000011Operating income also shows seasonal variation: $926,394,000 (three months ended 2025-03-31), $663,049,000 (2025-04-01 to 2025-06-30), $688,682,000 (2025-07-01 to 2025-09-30), $1,076,148,000 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31) and $540,874,000 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000072741-25-000011Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
No computed signal history for this symbol yet — signals need roughly 70 trading days of price history.
Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00, the company is a holding in the IVV ETF with a reported weight of 0.04% of that fund.
ETF constituents · market dataThe provided ownership evidence includes a single ETF membership record and does not list other ETF holdings or weights.
ETF constituents · market dataReads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Multiple institutional 13F disclosures in late August 2026 report new or increased stakes in Eversource Energy, including purchases of 63,158 shares, 15,984 shares, 334,254 shares, and 736,012 shares reported across filings published 27–1 August 2026.
News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-09-01Separate itemizations of new stakes by United Capital Financial Advisors LLC and Jefferies Financial Group Inc. were published as distinct notices in late August 2026.
News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-08-30Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The trailing twelve-month price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is 19.04.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeThe enterprise-value-to-trailing-12-months-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) multiple is 9.93, with trailing EBITDA of 5,169,953,000.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Several pieces of evidence together support a favorable read. Revenue and operating income show a recurring seasonal pattern with consistently material Q1 peaks (fundamentals-0, fundamentals-1), which helps explain quarter-to-quarter swings in EPS; EPS volatility (fundamentals-2) therefore appears at least partly driven by seasonality rather than only structural deterioration. Cash and cash equivalents rose materially into mid-2026 (fundamentals-5), improving near-term liquidity while market multiples (trailing P/E 19.04 and EV/EBITDA 9.93; valuation-0, valuation-1) are within ranges many analysts treat as reasonable for utilities, and several large institutional 13F filings show new or increased stakes (news-0, news-1, news-2), which is corroborative demand-side evidence. The gradual rise in diluted share count and outstanding common shares (fundamentals-3) is transparent and helps contextualize EPS per-share dynamics.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.30
20 surviving claims rest on 12 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 35% of them, and 100% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The read rests on a moderate-sized evidence set but with meaningful concentration: a single analyst contributes a large share of the surviving claims and a small group of sources underpins most conclusions. Because everything the desk raised survived review, the dataset may reflect confirmation rather than independent refutation; treat these findings as informational and assign limited weight until more diverse, independent sources corroborate them.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
13 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.2 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on ES Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.