ES
Eversource EnergyEvidence as of 2026-09-25The desk's Snapshot
3 of 15 open to everyone · members see allRead the full desk report on ES
Seven analysts, the debate, the risk review, every claim cited. And the same for every name you hold.
Free plan, no credit card required. Silver opens the full report, $19.99 a month. AI-written · every claim cites a source · Insight, not advice.
Overview · Eversource Energy
Eversource Energy, a public utility holding company, engages in the energy delivery business. The company operates through Electric Distribution, Electric Transmission, Natural Gas Distribution, and Water Distribution segments. It is involved in the transmission and distribution of electricity; solar power facilities; and distribution of natural gas. The company operates regulated water utilities that provide water s…
Management team
- Mr. James W. Hunt III, J.D. · Executive VP of Corporate Relations & Sustainability and SecretaryFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Duncan R. MacKay J.D. · Chief Compliance Officer & Deputy General CounselFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Susan L. Sgroi · Executive VP of Human Resources & Information TechnologyFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Gregory B. Butler Esq., J.D. · Executive VP & General CounselFind on LinkedIn
Start free to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it, not a rating or a recommendation.
−0.8 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled. The rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The evidence balance is Cautious ( -0.8 of a possible +2; confidence high). Revenues increased from 4,118,355,000 USD in fiscal Q1 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-04-30) to 4,503,633,000 USD in fiscal Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-30), and were 2,838,068,000 USD in fiscal Q2 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-07-31) versus 2,903,189,000 USD in fiscal Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-31). Diluted EPS fell to 0.14 USD/shares in fiscal Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-31) from 0.96 USD/shares in fiscal Q2 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-07-31), while weighted average diluted shares outstanding rose from 367,677,618 shares in fiscal Q1 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-04-30) to 376,998,879 shares in fiscal Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-31).
Trailing twelve‑month free cash flow is negative 1,417,892,000 USD and free cash flow per share is - 3.761 USD, even as reported cash was 1,819,319,000 USD and reported long‑term noncurrent debt stood near 26,608,990,000 USD as of 2026-06-30. Valuation metrics include a trailing P/E of 17.24 and EV/EBITDA (TTM) of 9.44 with EBITDA (TTM) of 5,169,953,000 USD. Filings add new regulatory, AI, and cyber risk language and disclose continuing financial exposure tied to sold offshore wind project interests; reporting also notes goodwill of 4.23 billion USD as of 2025-12-31. Market coverage emphasizes dividend stability and a reported dividend of 0.79 USD per share with ex‑dividend date 2026-09-21, and coverage highlights a Transmission Initiative Down East (TIDE) project selection in New England.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else (no outside knowledge, no browsing), so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC (revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter) and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenues were 4,503,633,000 USD for fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) compared with 4,118,355,000 USD for fiscal Q1 2025 (2025-01-01 to 2025-03-31, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001628280-26-032278Revenues were 2,903,189,000 USD for fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo) compared with 2,838,068,000 USD for fiscal Q2 2025 (2025-04-01 to 2025-06-30, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001628280-26-051906Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full: its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet; its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
The 10-K filed 17 February 2026 adds a risk that the company is increasingly integrating artificial intelligence into operations and that AI "may produce inaccurate, biased or otherwise unreliable forecasts or recommendations" which the filing says could result in "service disruptions, regulatory penalties and reputational harm."
10-K filed 2026-02-17The 10-K filed 17 February 2026 adds language that cyber events, "including acts of war or terrorism, targeted directly on or indirectly affecting our systems or the systems of third parties on which we rely," could "severely impair operations, negatively impact our business, lead to the disclosure of confidential information and adversely affect our reputation."
10-K filed 2026-02-17Reads the signal panel above (momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta) and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
No computed signal history for this symbol yet — signals need roughly 70 trading days of price history.
Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
Institutional investors reported a total holding value of "$23.06B" as of 2026-06-30 (13F data carries a reporting lag).
13F holdings · 1128 filers · as of 2026-06-30The reported institutional holder count was 1,128 as of 2026-06-30, with a quarter-over-quarter holder_count_delta_qoq of 865.
13F holdings · 1128 filers · as of 2026-06-30Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
A theme in recent coverage is dividend stability: an article describes Eversources steady quarterly dividend across its Northeast utility network.
News · kalkinemedia.com · 2026-09-24Several outlets reported a specific dividend announcement: a published item states Eversource Energy announced a total dividend of $0.79 per share with an ex-dividend date of 2026-09-21 and a cash payment payable on 2026-09-30.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-21Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5: who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
Free cash flow, trailing twelve months, was negative $1,417,892,000.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeFree cash flow per share, trailing twelve months, was -$3.761 and price-to-FCF is not reported (price_to_fcf: null).
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score. The argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Several company-specific items in the record jointly support a favorable read: revenues rose year-over-year in both reported Q1 and Q2 periods and the company reported positive operating income in those quarters, while valuation metrics such as a trailing P/E of 17.24 and an EV/EBITDA of 9.44 sit in ranges that market participants often interpret as valuation support. Independent coverage of dividend stability, a recent dividend announcement, and a regional transmission project award (TIDE) together indicate ongoing cash-return policy visibility and business wins tied to regulated/transmission activity. Institutional ownership concentration (large reported holdings and major holders like BlackRock) and active inclusion in major ETFs provide evidence strength for continued investor interest. The items that appear most negative — an EPS drop and trailing negative free cash flow — can be viewed alongside rising diluted shares and intra-year operating-income variability, which limits the strength of the EPS/FCF signals as definitive company-quality breakers in isolation.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.34
29 surviving claims rest on 13 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 21% of them, and 100% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The surviving read is moderately diversified across sources but still leans on a relatively small set of documents and contributors; one analyst accounts for a fifth of the claims, and everything raised by the desk survived debate. That combination reduces the read's independence: it is informative but carries some source- and analyst-concentration fragility, so treat its weight as provisional rather than definitive.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment. When the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here (no outside knowledge, no browsing), and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
13 filings· 3 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data, not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer−0.2 to the score
4 documents· 3 cited
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes−0.8 to the score
2 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only; it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal; the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
The full terminal on ES Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Get this for the names you actually hold
Every name in your portfolio, researched the same way, plus the one thing no sample can show: how each one sits inside what you already own.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.