EXC
EXELON CORPEvidence as of 2026-09-02Overview · EXELON CORP
Exelon Corporation, a utility services holding company, engages in the energy distribution and transmission businesses in the United States and Canada. The company is involved in the purchase and regulated retail sale of electricity and natural gas, transmission and distribution of electricity, and distribution of natural gas to retail customers. It also offers support services, including legal, human resources, info…
Management team
- Ms. Cynthia McCabe · Senior VP & Chief Communications OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. David Andrew Glockner · Executive Vice President of Compliance, Audit & RiskFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Michael A. Innocenzo · Executive VP & COOFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Jeanne M. Jones · Executive VP & CFOFind on LinkedIn
Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.0 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The evidence balance is Mixed. Revenues in FISCAL Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-03-31) were reported at $ 7,242,000,000 and operating income in that same quarter was $ 1,605,000,000. Trailing twelve‑month EBITDA is $ 10,432,000,000 giving an EV/EBITDA of 8.97 on an enterprise value of $ 93,562,000,000, while trailing twelve‑month EPS of $ 3.05 implies a P/E of 14.37 at price $ 43.83.
Balance‑sheet and market signals show higher leverage and mixed market sentiment: long‑term noncurrent debt was $ 47,859,000,000 as of 2026-03-31, stockholders’ equity was $ 29,315,000,000 on the same date, trailing twelve‑month free cash flow was negative $ 3.552 billion (FCF per share $ -3.462), and cash was $ 713,000,000 as of 2026-03-31. Six‑month price momentum is -9.6% (20th percentile) and dividend yield is 2.83% (77th percentile) as of 2026-09-01.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenues in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) were $7,242,000,000.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001109357-26-000063Revenues in fiscal Q3 2025 (2025-07-01 to 2025-09-30, 3mo) were $6,705,000,000, which is lower than the fiscal Q1 2026 figure of $7,242,000,000.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001109357-25-000182Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
A Form 8-K for EXELON CORP was filed on 2026-08-25 (the 8-K filed 25 August 2026).
8-K filed 2026-08-25Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
6‑month price momentum was -9.6% and ranks in the 20th percentile of the 547‑security research universe as of 2026-09-01.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-01Relative strength versus SPY is negative over 6 months (-21.9%) and 12 months (-16.0%), with the 6‑month relative‑strength rank at the 20th percentile of 547 on 2026-09-01.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-01Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
13F filings report total institutional holdings of $566,466 as of 2026-03-31, with a holder_count of 1 and a quarter-over-quarter value change of -84.9%; 13F filings carry a 45-day reporting lag.
13F holdings · 1 filers · as of 2026-03-31SageView Advisory Group, LLC is listed as the top institutional holder with a reported value of $566,466 as of 2026-03-31.
13F holdings · 1 filers · as of 2026-03-31Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
A simplywall.st headline on 1 September 2026 flagged recent leadership changes at Exelon and questioned whether the stock remains a bargain after those changes.
News · simplywall.st · 2026-09-01Multiple syndicated pieces (thelincolnianonline.com) on 29–31 August 2026 reported new or increased institutional positions in Exelon, citing purchases by United Capital Financial Advisors LLC, Nissay Asset Management Corp Japan, and Rakuten Investment Management Inc.
News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-08-30Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
Trailing twelve-month free cash flow (FCF) is negative $3.552 billion, producing a negative FCF per share of $-3.462 and making a conventional price/FCF multiple not meaningful.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeEnterprise value is $93.562 billion and trailing twelve-month EBITDA is $10.432 billion, implying an EV/EBITDA multiple of 8.97.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Several company-specific fundamentals point to a favorable read: revenues rose to $7.242B in fiscal Q1 2026 (fundamentals-0) and exceed the $6.705B reported in Q3 2025 (fundamentals-1), while operating income has trended higher in recent quarters to $1.605B in Q1 2026 (fundamentals-2, fundamentals-3). Balance-sheet and market signals provide complementary support: stockholders' equity has increased year-over-year to $29.315B (fundamentals-6), the EV/EBITDA multiple is a moderate 8.97 (valuation-1), and the trailing P/E is 14.37 on TTM EPS of $3.05 (valuation-2), all of which are observable, verifiable data points of moderate-to-strong strength. These positives mitigate some market concerns: while trailing FCF is negative due to capex exceeding operating cash flow (valuation-0, valuation-3), the underlying evidence is strong that the negative FCF derives from large reported capex rather than weak EBITDA, and ETF passive ownership and a 2.83% dividend yield indicate persistent investor interest (ownership-2, market-2) with moderate evidence strength. In sum, company-level revenue and operating-income momentum together with reasonable EV/EBITDA and P/E metrics form a coherent, evidence-backed bull case, while the largest bear points rest on capital-spend and leverage facts that are well-documented but explainable within the dataset.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.35
29 surviving claims rest on 13 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 24% of them, and 98% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The read rests on a moderate number of distinct sources but with noticeable concentration: one analyst/actor supplies nearly a quarter of surviving claims and almost all proposed claims passed peer challenge, which implies low internal disagreement but also raises the risk that systematic errors or blind spots from a small set of contributors could propagate. Fundamental items anchored to primary filings (10‑Qs, 8‑K) carry more resilience, while computed signals, aggregated news and ETF‑holdings snapshots are more fragile because they depend on timing, calculation choices and third‑party feeds.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 8th of 10 in Utilities—Regulated Electric (as of 2026-09-01).
6-month relative strength ranks 8th of 10 in Utilities—Regulated Electric (as of 2026-09-01).
90-day volatility ranks 4th of 10 in Utilities—Regulated Electric (as of 2026-09-01).
dividend yield ranks 8th of 10 in Utilities—Regulated Electric (as of 2026-09-01).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
20 filings· 2 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.5 to the score
1 document
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes+0.0 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash−0.3 to the score
2 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on EXC Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.