FANG
Evidence as of 2026-09-02Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.8 on a −2 to +2 scale — was +0.7 before the debate changed the read.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The desk rates the evidence as Constructive ( +0.8 of a possible +2; confidence high). Revenues rose across the reported sequence from $ 3,678,000,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 30 June 2025 to $ 3,924,000,000, then $ 4,240,000,000 and to $ 5,562,000,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 30 June 2026. Shares outstanding and weighted‑average diluted shares have trended lower over the same twelve‑month span, and long‑term debt contracted from $ 15,119,000,000 as of 30 June 2025 to $ 11,066,000,000 as of 30 June 2026 while cash and cash equivalents increased to $ 462,000,000 as of 30 June 2026.
Valuation and cash‑flow snapshots show a market cap of $ 56,962,553,887 and EV of $ 67,566,553,887 as of the price date 2026‑09‑02, with EV/EBITDA (TTM) at 6.68, EBITDA (TTM) at $ 10,120,000,000 and P/E (TTM) at 16.12. The desk also notes OCF (TTM) of $ 6,942,000,000 and DDA (TTM) of $ 5,117,000,000; free‑cash‑flow and CAPEX detail are missing, so Price/FCF cannot be calculated.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Reported revenues rose from $3,678,000,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 30 June 2025 to $3,924,000,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 30 September 2025, then to $4,240,000,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 31 March 2026 and to $5,562,000,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 30 June 2026.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001539838-25-000127Operating income (loss) margins expanded: operating income was $1,139,000,000 on $3,678,000,000 revenue (about 30.9%) in the fiscal quarter ended 30 June 2025, $1,236,000,000 on $3,924,000,000 revenue (about 31.5%) in the fiscal quarter ended 30 September 2025, $116,000,000 on $4,240,000,000 revenue (about 2.7%) in the fiscal quarter ended 31 March 2026, and $2,512,000,000 on $5,562,000,000 revenue (about 45.1%) in the fiscal quarter ended 30 June 2026.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001539838-25-000127weakened in debateReads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
No computed signal history for this symbol yet — signals need roughly 70 trading days of price history.
Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00, FANG is recorded with a 0.05% weight in the IVV ETF.
ETF constituents · market dataThe provided ownership evidence contains a single ETF membership record for FANG (the IVV entry) with the timestamp 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00.
ETF constituents · market dataReads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Two distinct outlets ran the same take noting Diamondback has risen 5.9% since its last earnings report (articles published 2026-09-02).
News · zacks.com · 2026-09-02A 2026-09-01 headline reports Diamondback 'Crosses Major Permian Milestone', a company-specific operational achievement.
News · kalkinemedia.com · 2026-09-01Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The price/earnings (TTM) ratio is 16.12.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeEnterprise value to EBITDA (TTM) is 6.68 and EBITDA (TTM) is 10,120,000,000.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
The evidence shows a consistent quarter-to-quarter revenue increase across four reported quarters, accompanied by a large improvement in operating income and a strong rebound in net income by 30 June 2026. Share counts and diluted shares have trended lower over the twelve-month span, which amplifies per-share earnings outcomes, while long-term debt materially declined and cash balances rose — improving the balance-sheet profile. Valuation metrics in the dataset (P/E 16.12; EV/EBITDA 6.68) sit alongside sizeable trailing operating cash flow and DDA, which together indicate earnings and cash-generation scale relative to enterprise value. Together, these claims jointly support a favorable read on the company’s recent fundamental and balance-sheet trajectory and counter arguments that focus on isolated or stale datapoints.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.34
19 surviving claims rest on 10 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 32% of them, and 95% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The evidence base is moderately concentrated: 19 surviving claims draw on only 10 distinct sources and one analyst accounts for about a third of the desk's contribution, so a single heavily-weighted viewpoint could materially shift the read. The very high debate-survival rate (95%) means most claims passed internal scrutiny, but combined source concentration and analyst dependence reduce the independent corroboration and thus how much confidence the desk can place in the composite narrative.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
12 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+1.5 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score
6 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on FANG Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.