FDXF
Evidence as of 2026-09-22The desk's Snapshot
3 of 15 open to everyone · members see allRead the full desk report on FDXF
Seven analysts, the debate, the risk review, every claim cited. And the same for every name you hold.
Free plan, no credit card required. Silver opens the full report, $19.99 a month. AI-written · every claim cites a source · Insight, not advice.
No company profile on file for FDXF yet.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it, not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.1 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled. The rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The surviving record is mixed (+ 0.1 of a possible + 2; confidence high). Total assets increased from $ 5,022,000,000 as of 31 May 2025 to $ 6,884,000,000 as of 31 May 2026, while stockholders' equity that climbed from $ 1,671,000,000 (31 May 2023) to $ 2,393,000,000 (31 May 2025) is reported as negative $ 497,000,000 as of 31 May 2026. Long‑term debt is reported at $ 4,264,000,000 as of 31 May 2026 and common shares outstanding were 149,518,133 as of 3 August 2026.
Filings show a Form 10‑K filed on 2026-08-05, the creation of FedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc. on July 14, 2025 and FDXF Holding Corporation on February 11, 2026, and a tax‑free spin‑off completed with an approximate 80.1% distribution on June 1, 2026. FY 2026 = fiscal quarter ended 2026-08-03. Market metrics in the packet show a price of 117.6 (2026-09-21), market capitalization of 17,583,332,441 and enterprise value of 21,847,332,441. Institutional holders reported a total position value of $ 13.72B as of 2026-06-30, and recent coverage and governance items are documented, including a 52‑week low intraday trade of $ 121.82 on 16 September 2026 and board action removing an EVP for Code of Conduct violations.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else (no outside knowledge, no browsing), so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC (revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter) and reports which way the trend is running.
Total assets increased from $5,022,000,000 as of 31 May 2025 to $6,884,000,000 as of 31 May 2026.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001628280-26-053359Stockholders' equity rose from $1,671,000,000 as of 31 May 2023 to $2,124,000,000 as of 31 May 2024 and to $2,393,000,000 as of 31 May 2025, then declined to negative $497,000,000 as of 31 May 2026.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001628280-26-053359Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full: its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet; its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
The Form 10-K was filed on 2026-08-05.
10-K filed 2026-08-05FedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc. was incorporated on July 14, 2025 to serve as the ultimate parent company in connection with the planned Spin-Off, FDXF Holding Corporation was formed on February 11, 2026 as an intermediate holding company, and ownership of FedEx Freight, Inc. and its subsidiaries was transferred in reorganizations completed on May 29, 2026.
10-K filed 2026-08-05Reads the signal panel above (momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta) and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
No computed signal history for this symbol yet — signals need roughly 70 trading days of price history.
Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
Institutional holders reported a total position value of $13.72B as of 2026-06-30 (13F reporting carries a 45-day lag).
13F holdings · 1136 filers · as of 2026-06-30The top five reported institutional holders as of 2026-06-30 include BlackRock, Inc. ($1.37B), Dodge & Cox ($1.08B), VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC ($1.07B), VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC ($733.4M), and PRIMECAP MANAGEMENT CO/CA/ ($611.3M).
13F holdings · 1136 filers · as of 2026-06-30Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Articles report FedEx Freight shares reached a new 52-week low mid-day on 16 September 2026, trading as low as $121.82 with volume of 448,224 shares.
News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-09-16Multiple outlets cover leadership changes: two GuruFocus headlines on 14 September 2026 note Michael Rodgers being named/expanded into an executive vice president role.
News · gurufocus.com · 2026-09-14Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5: who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The reported market price used in this evidence set is 117.6 on 2026-09-21.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeThe market capitalization shown is 17,583,332,441.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score. The argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
The most constructive signals in the evidence are the material increase in total assets (fundamentals-0), the completion of the corporate reorganizations and tax-free Spin-Off (filings-1, filings-2) and the large institutional ownership base led by major asset managers (ownership-0, ownership-1). Together those items suggest a balance-sheet expansion and strong institutional interest around the new standalone entity rather than a purely market-driven debilitation. The bear case leans heavily on a single point-in-time negative stockholders' equity figure and recent headline-driven price/leadership noise; those items appear more consistent with accounting and structural effects from the May–June 2026 reorganization and short-term market reaction than with a sustained deterioration supported by multiple corroborating fundamentals. Evidence strength: the asset increase and institutional holdings are high-strength signals (reported balances and 13F positions); the negative equity and headline items are medium-to-low strength because they are single-date balances or press reports that can reflect accounting/reorganization timing and short-term market moves.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.38
26 surviving claims rest on 10 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 23% of them, and 100% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The evidence set rests on a moderate number of independent sources but a concentrated analyst influence and a perfect survival rate in the desk debate. That combination raises fragility: surviving claims are materially supported on paper, yet the heavy weight of a single analyst and the lack of internal challenge reduce the read's resilience to new or corrective filings.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment. When the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here (no outside knowledge, no browsing), and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
1 filing
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data, not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer−0.3 to the score
2 documents
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes+0.0 to the score
2 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.5 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only; it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal; the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
The full terminal on FDXF Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Get this for the names you actually hold
Every name in your portfolio, researched the same way, plus the one thing no sample can show: how each one sits inside what you already own.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.