FFIV
F5, INC.Evidence as of 2026-09-19The desk's Snapshot
3 of 15 open to everyone · members see allRead the full desk report on FFIV
Seven analysts, the debate, the risk review, every claim cited. And the same for every name you hold.
Free plan, no credit card required. Silver opens the full report, $19.99 a month. AI-written · every claim cites a source · Insight, not advice.
Overview · F5, INC.
F5, Inc. provides multi-cloud application security and delivery solutions in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific region. The company's multi-cloud application security and delivery solutions enable its customers to develop, deploy, operate, secure, and govern applications in any architecture, from on-premises to the public cloud. It offers application security and delivery product…
Management team
- Ms. Angelique M. Okeke · Executive VP & General CounselFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Yvette H. Smith · Chief Information Officer & SVP of Customer Success and Business TransformationFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Lyra Amber Schramm · Executive VP & Chief People OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Rob Gruening · Director of Corporate CommunicationsFind on LinkedIn
Start free to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it, not a rating or a recommendation.
−0.5 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled. The rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The evidence balance is Cautious ( - 0.5 of a possible + 2; confidence high). Reported revenue rose from $ 811,700,000 in the fiscal quarter Jan 1–Mar 31, 2026 (Q1 2026 = fiscal quarter ended 2026-01-30) to $ 865,077,000 in the fiscal quarter Apr 1–Jun 30, 2026 (Q2 2026 = fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-30). Gross profit increased from $ 660,800,000 to $ 711,513,000 across those same intervals, implying gross margin moved from about 81.4% to about 82.3% using the reported revenue figures.
Operating income rose from $ 179,018,000 to $ 213,267,000, and net income increased from $ 147,755,000 to $ 208,208,000 over the two quarters cited. Entity common shares outstanding declined from 58,089,614 as of Nov 12, 2025 (FY 2025 = fiscal quarter ended 2025-11-12) to 56,627,182 as of Aug 3, 2026 (Q3 2026 = fiscal quarter ended 2026-08-03), while total assets rose from $ 6,319,492,000 as of Sep 30, 2025 to $ 6,829,074,000 as of Jun 30, 2026.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else (no outside knowledge, no browsing), so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC (revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter) and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue was $811,700,000 in the fiscal quarter Jan 1–Mar 31, 2026 and rose to $865,077,000 in the fiscal quarter Apr 1–Jun 30, 2026.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001048695-26-000051Gross profit was $660,800,000 in the fiscal quarter Jan 1–Mar 31, 2026 and increased to $711,513,000 in the fiscal quarter Apr 1–Jun 30, 2026 (implying gross margin moved from about 81.4% to about 82.3% using those reported revenue figures).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001048695-26-000051Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full: its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet; its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
In the 10-K filed 25 November 2025, management disclosed a Cyber Incident first revealed on October 15, 2025, in which a nation-state threat actor gained unauthorized, long-term access to certain company systems and exfiltrated files that included portions of BIG-IP source code and information about undisclosed BIG-IP vulnerabilities.
10-K filed 2025-11-25In the 10-K filed 25 November 2025, management stated that, to date, it is not aware of any undisclosed critical or remote code vulnerabilities, is not aware of active exploitation of any undisclosed vulnerabilities within its products, and has no evidence of modification to its software supply chain or to NGINX source code or its F5 Distributed Cloud Services or Silverline systems.
10-K filed 2025-11-25Reads the signal panel above (momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta) and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
No computed signal history for this symbol yet — signals need roughly 70 trading days of price history.
Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
13F-reported institutional holdings total $22.21B for the reporting period ended 2026-06-30, with a reported quarter-over-quarter value change of -87.0% and 833 institutional holders (holder_count_delta_qoq = 633).
13F holdings · 833 filers · as of 2026-06-30Top reported institutional holders in the 13F include BlackRock, Inc. at $2.61B, VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC at $1.53B, STATE STREET CORP at $1.29B, VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC at $1.17B, and Jericho Capital Asset Management L.P. at $881.3M (as reported for the period ended 2026-06-30).
13F holdings · 833 filers · as of 2026-06-30Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Coverage includes announcements of new product partnerships and security tools, e.g., a September 17, 2026 headline about a partnership to deliver secure digital workspaces.
News · simplywall.st · 2026-09-17Multiple outlets are reporting company insider stock sales: a September 17, 2026 piece reports John Anthony Maddison sold 204 shares and a September 16, 2026 item reports Michael Montoya sold 4,426 shares.
News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-09-17Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5: who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate that today's price would justify is 25.79% (0.2579).
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closePrice-to-FCF (TTM) is 38.55.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score. The argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Quarter-to-quarter reported operating and profitability metrics show consistent improvement: revenue, gross profit and gross margin, operating income, and net income all rose between the Jan–Mar 2026 and Apr–Jun 2026 quarters, and point-in-time assets increased year-to-date; these items jointly constitute strong, company-reported fundamental performance signals. Management’s 10-K also states they have found no evidence of active exploitation or undisclosed critical vulnerabilities to date, and the company generated large operating cash flow in fiscal 2025 while deploying material cash to share repurchases and M&A — evidence of cash generation and capital allocation capacity. Valuation and cash-flow multiples (P/FCF, EV/EBITDA, P/E) are presented alongside an implied FCF growth rate the market would need to justify current price; those metrics provide a transparent frame for assessing how reported fundamentals relate to market valuation. The bear case built around the disclosed cyber incident and updated risk factors points to real reputational and regulatory risk, but the filings also document close monitoring and no current evidence of active exploitation, and institutional ownership remains concentrated among large managers — factors that mitigate, in part, the impact of headline risk in the near-term. Evidence strength: quarter-to-quarter operational and cash-flow figures are strong (company financial statements); the cyber-incident disclosures are material but partially mitigated by management’s contemporaneous statements (filings); valuation metrics are medium-strength inputs that require further context (market-derived).
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.34
25 surviving claims rest on 12 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 24% of them, and 98% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The read rests on a moderate breadth of underlying sources but a small number of analysts contribute a sizable share of the surviving claims; that concentration means individual analyst views and a few key documents carry outsized influence on the narrative. Also, the very high survival rate from the desk debate implies low internal challenge — useful for coherence, but it raises fragility because many claims depend on the same files or perspectives rather than a wide independent corroboration.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment. When the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here (no outside knowledge, no browsing), and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
14 filings· 2 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data, not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+1.0 to the score
7 documents· 3 cited
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes−0.8 to the score
3 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only; it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal; the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
The full terminal on FFIV Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Get this for the names you actually hold
Every name in your portfolio, researched the same way, plus the one thing no sample can show: how each one sits inside what you already own.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.