Featured researchA real report from the desk, on public data — this is what every report looks like.

FRT

FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUSTEvidence as of 2026-09-02

Overview · FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST

Federal Realty is a recognized leader in the ownership, operation and redevelopment of high-quality retail-based properties located primarily in major coastal markets from Washington, D.C. to Boston as well as San Francisco and Los Angeles. Founded in 1962, Federal Realty's mission is to deliver long-term, sustainable growth through investing in communities where retail demand exceeds supply. Its expertise includes c…

SectorReal Estate
IndustryREIT—Retail
Typeequity
ExchangeNYSE
Employees314
www.federalrealty.com

Management team

  • Ms. Dawn M. Becker · Executive VP, Chief Legal & Administrative Officer and SecretaryFind on LinkedIn
  • Mr. Daniel Guglielmone · Executive VP, CFO & TreasurerFind on LinkedIn
  • Mr. Donald C. Wood CPA · CEO, President & DirectorFind on LinkedIn
  • Mr. Porter Bellew · Senior Vice President & Chief Information OfficerFind on LinkedIn

Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.

Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.

Moneyta sentiment

Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.

Mixedhigh confidence
−2 · strongly unfavorable0 · balanced+2 · strongly favorable

+0.3 on a −2 to +2 scale.

What builds the score

Fundamentals
+0.0
Market signals
+0.8
Ownership and flow
+0.0

Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.

News tonecontext · not scored+0.2 observed
3 favorable3 neutral0 unfavorableacross 5 outlets

Editor's note

Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.

GoodwinAI editor

The surviving evidence paints a mixed picture. Revenues rose across the available quarterly series from $ 309,154,000 for the quarter ended 31 March 2025 to $ 311,523,000 (30 June 2025), $ 322,253,000 (30 September 2025) and $ 341,084,000 (31 March 2026). Operating income and net income show large intra‑year swings — operating income ranged from $ 108,133,000 to $ 208,985,000 across the matched quarters and calculated operating margins swung from about 34% to about 65%, while net income alternated between roughly $ 61.6 million and $ 159.1 million for the same periods.

Market and valuation metrics add nuance: the trailing twelve‑month dividend yield is + 3.83% (88th percentile of the 547‑security universe), trailing P/E is 23.59, EV/EBITDA is 15.03 on an enterprise value of 15,036,710,894, and market cap is 10,188,741,894. Price action shows the security + 7.7% above its 200‑day SMA and − 2.6% below its 50‑day SMA with a Golden Cross flagged, momentum_12_1 is + 41.4% (77th percentile) while 6‑month momentum is + 9.2% (55th percentile), short‑term realized volatility is low (90‑day annualized 16.8%, 10th percentile), and beta versus SPY is 0.19 with correlation 0.15.

How this note was made

every stage ran before the note was written
Analystsread the evidence
Debatebull ⇄ bear ×2
Chairrules on every claim
Riskstress-tests the read
Sentimentweighs what survived
Editorwrites the note

Analyst desk

Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.

MercerAI fundamentals analyst
+1.0

Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.

Revenues rose across the available quarterly series from $309,154,000 in the quarter ended 31 March 2025 to $311,523,000 in the quarter ended 30 June 2025, $322,253,000 in the quarter ended 30 September 2025 and $341,084,000 in the quarter ended 31 March 2026.

XBRL companyfacts · 0000034903-25-000037

Operating income has shown large intra-year variation: $108,133,000 in the quarter ended 31 March 2025, $202,744,000 in the quarter ended 30 June 2025, $110,668,000 in the quarter ended 30 September 2025 and $208,985,000 in the quarter ended 31 March 2026.

XBRL companyfacts · 0000034903-25-000037
OakesAI filings and risk analyst
+0.0

Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.

Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.

Which filings the desk reads

The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.

NashAI market signals analyst
+1.0

Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.

The trailing twelve‑month dividend yield is +3.83% and ranks in the 88th percentile of the 547‑security research universe, indicating a relatively high yield versus peers on 2026-09-02.

Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02

Momentum measured as 'momentum_12_1' is +41.4% and ranks in the 77th percentile of the 547‑security universe, while 6‑month momentum is +9.2% and ranks at the 55th percentile of 547, showing stronger relative performance over the 12‑1 horizon than the 6‑month horizon on 2026-09-02.

Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02weakened in debate
EllisAI ownership and flow analyst
+0.0

Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.

As of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00, the company is a constituent of the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV).

ETF constituents · market data

As of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00, the company's weight in IVV is 0.02% of that fund.

ETF constituents · market data
YatesAI news analyst
+1.0

Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.

Two outlets ran headlines comparing Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) with EPR, presenting the topic as a value-stocks comparison.

News · zacks.com · 2026-09-01

A finance.yahoo.com piece discussed analyst sentiment about Federal Realty and noted the company has underperformed the broader market over the past year while analysts are described as moderately optimistic.

News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-08-19
TalbotAI insider activity analyst
no data on file

Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.

No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.

ArcherAI valuation analyst
+0.0

Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.

The trailing twelve-month price-to-earnings ratio is 23.59 (price 117.94 and EPS_ttm 5.0).

Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD close

Enterprise value is reported as 15,036,710,894 and trailing twelve-month EV/EBITDA is 15.03 (EBITDA_ttm 1,000,211,000).

Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD close

Debate and risk review

A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.

Debate1 round · 6 claims contested

A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.

The bull case

The evidence set supports a favorable read driven by steady top‑line growth and supportive market signals. Revenues show a clear up‑trend across the available quarterly series (fundamentals-0), which is a strong, directly reported filing-based datapoint. Market metrics are also supportive: the dividend yield ranks high in the universe (market-0), 12‑1 momentum is strong (market-1), the price sits well above the 200‑day average with a long-standing golden cross (market-2), and short‑term realized volatility is low versus peers (market-3); these are strong universe‑relative measurements from the market signals. The bear case highlighting earnings spikes and margin swings (fundamentals-1, fundamentals-2, fundamentals-3) rests on the same filings and constitutes valid caution about intra‑year volatility, but that variability coexists with rising revenues (moderate strength reconciliation). Other negatives—modest share count increase (fundamentals-4) and a nontrivial three‑year max drawdown (market-4)—are factual but limited in magnitude in the provided data, suggesting they temper rather than overturn the favorable indicators.

The bear case

Chair's verdict, claim by claim

Two outlets ran headlines comparing Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) with EPR, presenting the topic as a value-stocks comparison.The summary that two outlets ran value‑comparison headlines between FRT and EPR is consistent with the cited news evidence.upheld
A finance.yahoo.com piece discussed analyst sentiment about Federal Realty and noted the company has underperformed the broader market over the past year while analysts are described as moderately optimistic.The finance.yahoo.com item characterizing analyst sentiment and prior‑year underperformance is reflected in the supplied summary.upheld
The trailing twelve‑month dividend yield is +3.83% and ranks in the 88th percentile of the 547‑security research universe, indicating a relatively high yield versus peers on 2026-09-02.The trailing twelve‑month dividend yield and its 88th‑percentile ranking are consistent with the supplied market signal on 2026‑09‑02.upheld
Risk review

Fragility · computed, not argued

balanced0.38

26 surviving claims rest on 10 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 23% of them, and 98% of what the desk raised survived the debate.

The read rests on a moderate breadth of claims but only ten distinct sources, so source diversity is limited; a single analyst carrying nearly a quarter of the surviving claims indicates some analyst-concentration risk. The very high internal survival rate (98%) means few challenges removed claims during review, which can signal firm coherence but also raises the chance that borderline or correlated assertions persisted. Taken together, the evidence can be informative but should be treated as somewhat fragile — additional independent sources or disconfirming checks would materially strengthen confidence.

Peer context · computed, not argued

12-1 momentum ranks 1st of 2 in REIT—Retail (as of 2026-09-02).

6-month relative strength ranks 1st of 2 in REIT—Retail (as of 2026-09-02).

90-day volatility ranks 1st of 2 in REIT—Retail (as of 2026-09-02).

dividend yield ranks 2nd of 2 in REIT—Retail (as of 2026-09-02).

Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers

Context

Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.

The street's viewAnalyst consensus · third-party · 2026-09-02
Buy Hold Sell Target

Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.

What this was built from

Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.

14 filings· 1 cited

SEC XBRL filings

Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.

Read by Mercer+0.0 to the score

1 signal set

Moneyta signal set

Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.

Read by Nash+0.8 to the score

1 holdings record

Fund holdings

Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.

Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score

8 headlines· 2 cited

News coverage

Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.

Read by Yatesnothing survived

1 computation

Valuation inputs

TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.

Read by Archercontext only

1 record· 0 cited

Company profile

Sector, industry and company details.

1 record· 0 cited

Analyst consensus

Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.

Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.

Social sentiment

Crowd chatter as an evidence stream.

Coming soon

Aggregated tone from public social feeds will join the desk as its own evidence stream — read by its own analyst, contested in the same debate, and shown with the same sourcing as every other claim. Until it earns that bar, nothing renders here.

RPT-35f61168evidence ec62faf3cb52generated 9/2/2026, 11:59:12 PM · 90s14 model calls View trail

Written by AI, checked against sources

The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.

Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.

Get this for the tickers you actually hold

Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.

The full terminal on FRT Gold

Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.

Unlock

Institutional holders

Net institutional flow, Q/Q

Largest holder position

Insider buys, 90 days

Clustered insider value

Street target range

The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.

Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.