GE
GE AerospaceEvidence as of 2026-10-06The desk's Snapshot
3 of 15 open to everyone · members see allRead the full desk report on GE
Seven analysts, the debate, the risk review, every claim cited. And the same for every name you hold.
Free plan, no credit card required. Silver opens the full report, $19.99 a month. AI-written · every claim cites a source · Insight, not advice.
Overview · GE Aerospace
General Electric Company operates as a high-tech industrial company in Europe, China, Asia, the Americas, the Middle East, and Africa. It offers gas and steam turbines, full balance of plant, upgrade, and service solutions, as well as data-leveraging software for power generation, industrial, government, and other customers. The company also provides various solutions for its customers through combining onshore and o…
Management team
- Mr. Christoph A. Pereira · Chief Executive Officer of Aerospace Carbon Solutions (ACS) & SustainabilityFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Christian E. Meisner · Senior VP & Chief Human Resources OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. John R. Phillips III · Senior VP, General Counsel & SecretaryFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Russell T. Stokes · Senior VP & CEO of Commercial Engines & ServicesFind on LinkedIn
Start free to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it, not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.2 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled. The rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
Revenue and profitability data across the fiscal quarters show a rising top line from $ 9,935,000,000 in Q1 2025 to $ 13,349,000,000 in Q2 2026, with single-quarter net income moving from $ 1,978,000,000 in Q1 2025 to $ 2,370,000,000 in Q2 2026. Diluted EPS increased from $ 1.81 in Q1 2026 to $ 2.26 in Q2 2026, while shares outstanding declined steadily from 1,066,386,643 as of Q1 2025 to 1,037,562,513 as of Q2 2026.
Market and valuation signals are mixed: momentum metrics on 2026-10-05 include a 3-month momentum of -16.5% but a 12-month momentum of +21.3%; 30-day and 90-day annualized volatilities were +25.0% and +29.7%, respectively; the price exhibited a golden-cross technical that was 78 days old but was trading about -10.1% versus the 50-day SMA. Model-derived valuation outputs are stretched on some metrics (price/FCF = 118.22; implied FCF growth rate = 0.5937) while EV/EBITDA is 9.26 and reported cash of $ 43,299,000,000 exceeds long-term debt of $ 20,469,000,000.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else (no outside knowledge, no browsing), so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC (revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter) and reports which way the trend is running.
Quarterly revenues increased from $9,935,000,000 in the quarter ended 31 March 2025 to $11,023,000,000 in the quarter ended 30 June 2025, to $12,181,000,000 in the quarter ended 30 September 2025, to $12,392,000,000 in the quarter ended 31 March 2026, and to $13,349,000,000 in the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
XBRL companyfacts · 0000040545-26-000049Diluted earnings per share rose from $1.81 in the quarter ended 31 March 2026 to $2.26 in the quarter ended 30 June 2026 (diluted EPS for those fiscal quarters).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000040545-26-000049Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full: its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet; its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
On September 8, 2026, GE Aerospace announced an agreement to acquire Consolidated Precision Products for a cash purchase price of $11.75 billion, subject to closing adjustments.
8-K filed 2026-09-08The company stated the transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2027 and is subject to regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions.
8-K filed 2026-09-08Reads the signal panel above (momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta) and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
As of 2026-10-05, GE's 3-month price momentum was -16.5% while its 6-month momentum was +6.1% and the 12-month (12_1) momentum was +21.3%.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-10-05weakened in debateGE's momentum percentiles on 2026-10-05 were middling: 50th percentile for 6-month momentum and 61st percentile for 12_1 momentum against a universe of 765 names.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-10-05weakened in debateReads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of the 13F reporting period ended 2026-06-30, institutional holders reported a combined position value of "$303.93B" in GE, with 3,457 institutional holders and a quarter-over-quarter value change of 34.9%.
13F holdings · 3457 filers · as of 2026-06-30Top reported institutional holders in the 13F for the period ended 2026-06-30 include BlackRock, Inc. at "$33.32B", VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC at "$25.46B", and FMR LLC at "$18.32B".
13F holdings · 3457 filers · as of 2026-06-30Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
On 5 October 2026, several pieces of coverage flagged operational developments — LEAP engine deliveries, a large services backlog, and raised guidance — as drivers of attention for GE Aerospace.
News · kalkinemedia.com · 2026-10-05Coverage on 5 October 2026 separately highlighted services, defense engines, and cash generation as items 'in focus' ahead of GE Aerospace's quarterly report and noted an ex-dividend date.
News · kalkinemedia.com · 2026-10-05Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5: who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
Giglietti Robert M. (Vice President) has three Form 4 items filed 11 August 2026 showing a "code M" entry of "$375k" for "10242" shares and two sale entries of "$2.0M" for "5344" shares and "$1.8M" for "4898" shares (filed in insider:GE:the 4 filed 12 August 2026).
Form 4 · Giglietti Robert M. (Vice President) · $375k code M · 2026-08-11Ali Mohamed (Senior Vice President) has multiple Form 4 entries filed 24 July 2026 including "code M" entries of "$273k" for "3035" shares and "$352k" for "5061" shares, plus sales of "$626k" ("1769" shares), "$448k" ("1266"), "$984k" ("2782"), and "$806k" ("2279") (filed in insider:GE:the 4 filed 28 July 2026).
Form 4 · Ali Mohamed (Senior Vice President) · $273k code M · 2026-07-24Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The model-derived implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate today's price would justify is 59.37% (0.5937).
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closePrice-to-free-cash-flow (price/FCF) based on trailing twelve-month FCF is 118.22.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score. The argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Several company-specific fundamentals point toward an improving operating and capital-return profile: quarterly revenues show a clear upward sequence across the last five reported quarters, diluted EPS rose quarter-to-quarter in the most recent reporting pair, and single-quarter net income has increased to a higher recent level. The share count has been steadily reduced while cash repurchases grew, which increases earnings and cash-flow per share and helps reconcile high headline valuation ratios on a per-share basis. Balance-sheet strength is evident in reported cash materially exceeding long-term debt, and an EV/EBITDA multiple near 9.3 sits in a range that market practitioners often view as reasonable for large industrials. Institutional ownership is large and concentrated among major asset managers, and multiple sell-side analysts in the provided consensus have buy/positive ratings — together these items are commonly interpreted as support from market participants.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.31
36 surviving claims rest on 18 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 19% of them, and 97% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The evidence set is moderately robust: surviving claims draw from a reasonably diverse set of sources but a small number of contributors (one analyst at ~19% weight) carry a material share of the perspective, which raises sensitivity to those contributors' inputs. A very high survival rate from the desk's debate process increases internal consistency, but the read is somewhat fragile to shifts in a few key signals or filings because a minority of sources would meaningfully change the balance if contradicted.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 6th of 13 in Specialty Industrial Machinery (as of 2026-10-05).
6-month relative strength ranks 8th of 13 in Specialty Industrial Machinery (as of 2026-10-05).
90-day volatility ranks 5th of 13 in Specialty Industrial Machinery (as of 2026-10-05).
dividend yield ranks 9th of 13 in Specialty Industrial Machinery (as of 2026-10-05).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment. When the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here (no outside knowledge, no browsing), and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
12 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data, not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+1.2 to the score
11 documents· 2 cited
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes+0.0 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash−0.3 to the score
3 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.8 to the score
7 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
11 filings· 2 cited
Insider filings
Parsed Forms 3/4/5 from EDGAR: named insiders, share counts, prices, and 10b5-1 plan state, with stated and inferred flags kept apart.
Read by Talbot−0.8 to the score
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only; it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal; the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
The full terminal on GE Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Get this for the names you actually hold
Every name in your portfolio, researched the same way, plus the one thing no sample can show: how each one sits inside what you already own.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.