GEV
GE Vernova Inc.Evidence as of 2026-09-02Overview · GE Vernova Inc.
GE Vernova Inc., an energy company, engages in the provision of various products and services that generate, transfer, orchestrate, convert, and store electricity in the United States, Europe, Asia, the Americas, the Middle East, and Africa. The company operates through three segments: Power, Wind, and Electrification. The Power segment designs, manufactures, and services gas, nuclear, hydro, and steam technologies.…
Management team
- Ms. Maria Victoria Zingoni Dominguez · Chief Executive Officer of PowerFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Rachel Ann Gonzalez Esq. · General CounselFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Kenneth S. Parks · Chief Financial OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Jessica R. Uhl · PresidentFind on LinkedIn
Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.2 on a −2 to +2 scale — was +0.3 before the debate changed the read.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The evidence balance is Mixed ( +0.2 of a possible +2; was +0.3 before debate) with high confidence. Revenue rose from $9,339,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (period ended 31 March 2026) to $11,104,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (period ended 30 June 2026), and gross profit increased from $1,781,000,000 to $2,360,000,000 over the same two quarters, implying gross margin expansion from about 19.1% to about 21.2%.
Operating income climbed from $179,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 to $653,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026, taking operating margin from about 1.9% to about 5.9%. Net income was $4,745,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 and $668,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026, with diluted EPS falling from $17.44 to $2.47. The company’s share count continued to decline, with common shares outstanding moving from 268,719,995 as of 31 March 2026 to 266,333,581 as of 30 June 2026, and weighted-average diluted shares from 279,000,000 to 270,000,000.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue increased from $9,339,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (period ended 31 March 2026) to $11,104,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (period ended 30 June 2026).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001996810-26-000064Gross profit rose from $1,781,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (ended 31 March 2026) to $2,360,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (ended 30 June 2026), implying gross margin expansion from about 19.1% (1,781 / 9,339) to about 21.2% (2,360 / 11,104).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001996810-26-000148Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
A Form 8-K for the company was filed on 2026-08-27.
8-K filed 2026-08-27The provided filing record shows parse_status as "pending".
8-K filed 2026-08-27Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
Beta vs SPY is 2.05 and correlation vs SPY is 0.50 as of 2026-09-01, indicating the stock has historically moved more than twice the market's magnitude while only being moderately correlated with SPY.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-01Short- and medium-term realized volatility is high: 30-day annualized volatility is +54.5% and 90-day annualized volatility is +52.8%, with vol vs own history at the 69th percentile of the 547-stock universe on 2026-09-01.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-01Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 1 September 2026, GEV had a 0.49% weight in the IVV ETF.
ETF constituents · market dataAs of 2 September 2026 (01:54:11.783435+00:00), GEV had a 0.23% weight in the SCHB ETF.
ETF constituents · market dataReads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Multiple outlets report that Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and GE Vernova are near closing energy deals in Venezuela after months of negotiations, a theme carried in coverage linking the company to Venezuela energy project discussions.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-01Coverage explicitly frames Venezuelas energy reopening as potentially benefiting Chevron and GE Vernova while noting attendant risks in the same story theme.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-08-31Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The market-implied free cash flow (FCF) annual growth rate that today's price would justify under the model inputs is 36.51%.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closePrice-to-free-cash-flow (P/FCF) based on trailing twelve months FCF is 56.54.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Quarter-to-quarter operational metrics in the filings show clear improvement: revenue, gross profit, and operating income all rose materially from Q1 to Q2 2026 (strong evidence from the company filings), and operating and gross margins expanded in the same period (strong evidence). Share count declined and the company recorded large prior-period repurchases, which together provide tangible support for rising per-share economic measures (moderate evidence from filings). The sharp fall in reported net income and EPS between Q1 and Q2 appears at odds with the operating improvements, which suggests the EPS swing may be driven by non-operational or timing items rather than core business deterioration (the contrast is directly observable in the filings; evidence strength: moderate). Market signals also show a mixed-but-improving price setup: 12_1 momentum is strong and a golden cross with price above the 200-day SMA indicates constructive technical positioning even as shorter-term volatility is elevated (momentum/technical evidence: moderate).
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.37
28 surviving claims rest on 11 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 21% of them, and 96% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The read rests on a moderate breadth of sources (11) and a substantial set of surviving claims, which supports some confidence in the desk’s conclusions. However, one analyst supplied a fifth of the surviving claims and the debate preserved 96% of raised points, so weight should be tempered: source diversity limits single-source fragility but analyst concentration and a high survival rate imply less internal challenge to the ideas than would lower survival.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
10 filings· 2 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.5 to the score
1 document
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes+0.0 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash−0.6 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+1.0 to the score
5 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on GEV Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.