GEV
GE Vernova Inc.Evidence as of 2026-10-13The desk's Snapshot
3 of 15 open to everyone · members see allRead the full desk report on GEV
Seven analysts, the debate, the risk review, every claim cited. And the same for every name you hold.
Free plan, no credit card required. Silver opens the full report, $19.99 a month. AI-written · every claim cites a source · Insight, not advice.
Overview · GE Vernova Inc.
GE Vernova Inc., an energy company, engages in the provision of various products and services that generate, transfer, orchestrate, convert, and store electricity in the United States, Europe, Asia, the Americas, the Middle East, and Africa. The company operates through three segments: Power, Wind, and Electrification. The Power segment designs, manufactures, and services gas, nuclear, hydro, and steam technologies.…
Management team
- Ms. Maria Victoria Zingoni Dominguez · Chief Executive Officer of PowerFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Rachel Ann Gonzalez Esq. · General CounselFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Kenneth S. Parks · Chief Financial OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Jessica R. Uhl · PresidentFind on LinkedIn
Start free to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it, not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.5 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled. The rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The surviving record is constructive (+0.5 of a possible +2; confidence high) and leans on clear top‑line and margin expansion. Revenue rose from $ 8.032 billion in fiscal Q1 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-03-31) to $ 11.104 billion in fiscal Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-06-30), while gross profit increased from $ 1.470 billion to $ 2.360 billion over the same span and calculated gross margin moved from ~ 18.30 % to ~ 21.24 % at the end of Q2 2026.
The filings and market metrics reinforce a mixed but sizable footprint: reported FY 2025 revenue totaled $ 38.1 billion with net income $ 4.9 billion and diluted EPS $ 17.69; RPO rose to $ 150.2 billion from $ 119.0 billion year over year; shares outstanding have declined to 266,333,581 as of 2026-06-30 and recent cash repurchases included $ 1.1278 billion in fiscal Q1 2026. Market signals show a golden cross with price above the 50- and 200-day SMAs, elevated volatility (90‑day vol + 53.2 %), a 12‑1 momentum metric at + 49.1 %, and valuation that implies high growth priced in (implied FCF growth 39.54 %, price‑to‑FCF 62.72, trailing P/E 42.58).
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else (no outside knowledge, no browsing), so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC (revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter) and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue increased from $8.032 billion in fiscal Q1 2025 (2025-01-01 to 2025-03-31) to $11.104 billion in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001996810-25-000073Gross profit rose from $1.470 billion in fiscal Q1 2025 (2025-01-01 to 2025-03-31) to $2.360 billion in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001996810-26-000064Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full: its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet; its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
The Form 8-K filed 2026-08-27 reports that Kenneth Parks will retire effective April 2, 2027, Claire McDonough will become CFO effective January 1, 2027 (joining as strategic advisor November 1, 2026), and the offer letter provides a $1,000,000 base salary, a 100% target annual incentive (prorated for 2026), a 2024 LTIP equity award target of $5,225,000 expected in 2027, make-whole equity awards valued at $14,500,000 (50% RSUs, 50% PSUs) and a $5,000,000 cash sign-on payment (repayable if she resigns within 12 months).
8-K filed 2026-08-27The Form 10-K filed 2026-01-29 reports total revenues of $38.1 billion, net income of $4.9 billion (net income margin 12.8%), and diluted earnings per share of $17.69 for the year ended December 31, 2025.
10-K filed 2026-01-29Reads the signal panel above (momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta) and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
Beta vs SPY is 1.97 and correlation vs SPY is 0.49 as of 2026-10-12, indicating relatively high sensitivity to the market with only moderate correlation.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-10-12Three-month momentum is -6.5% (45th percentile over 881) while six-month momentum is +0.6% (45th percentile of 881), showing short-term negative price change and middling mid-term momentum as of 2026-10-12.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-10-12Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
Institutional 13F-reportable holders reported aggregate GEV holdings valued at "$258.32B" as of 2026-06-30 (13F filings carry a 45-day reporting lag).
13F holdings · 3470 filers · as of 2026-06-30As of the 13F period ended 2026-06-30, the top institutional holders included BlackRock, Inc. ($25.57B), VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC ($20.62B), FMR LLC ($18.97B), STATE STREET CORP ($13.83B), and GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC ($7.44B).
13F holdings · 3470 filers · as of 2026-06-30Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
An article on finance.yahoo.com (published 10 October 2026) reports that AI data center–related orders exceeded US$5 billion in the first half of 2026 and that management said those AI-linked contracts are already more than double the data center order total recorded for all of 2025.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-10-10Thelincolnianonline.com (published 10 October 2026) reports that Oak Grove Capital LLC increased its position in GE Vernova by 252.3% in the third quarter, owning 10,265 shares after the purchase per a Form 13F filing.
News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-10-10Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5: who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The market-derived implied free cash flow growth rate that today's price would justify is 39.54% (0.3954) under the stated discount and terminal assumptions.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeTrailing twelve-month free cash flow (FCF) is $4,291,000,000 and FCF per share is $15.8926, producing a price-to-FCF of 62.72.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score. The argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Several company-specific fundamentals and filings jointly support a favorable read. Revenue and gross profit have risen meaningfully between fiscal Q1 2025 and fiscal Q2 2026, with calculated gross margin expanding to ~21.2% in Q2 2026 (fundamentals-0, fundamentals-1, fundamentals-2). The company is simultaneously reducing diluted share count and funding large repurchases (fundamentals-3, fundamentals-4), while reported backlog (RPO) increased 26% year-over-year to $150.2B (filings-2), which academically signals stronger forward revenue coverage. Market signals and investor positioning add corroboration: strong 12‑month rotational momentum and a golden-cross technical state (market-2, market-3), sizable institutional ownership including major asset managers (ownership-0, ownership-1), and a street consensus skewed toward buy ratings. These points together form a coherent case that operational growth, improving margins, shareholder-return activity, and institutional endorsement are aligned with a constructive informational read.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.38
32 surviving claims rest on 12 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 19% of them, and 97% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The evidence set rests on a moderate number of distinct sources but a relatively large bundle of surviving claims, so individual claims carry useful signal while the read is still somewhat concentrated. The fact that one analyst accounts for nearly a fifth of assertions and that 97% of raised points survived debate implies low internal dispute but also that the desk’s view is brittle to any issues in the key sources or dominant analyst inputs.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 1st of 3 in Utilities—Renewable (as of 2026-10-12).
90-day volatility ranks 1st of 3 in Utilities—Renewable (as of 2026-10-12).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment. When the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here (no outside knowledge, no browsing), and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
10 filings· 3 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data, not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.9 to the score
5 documents· 4 cited
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes+0.7 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash−0.3 to the score
2 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.6 to the score
4 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only; it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal; the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
The full terminal on GEV Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Get this for the names you actually hold
Every name in your portfolio, researched the same way, plus the one thing no sample can show: how each one sits inside what you already own.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.