GL
GLOBE LIFE INC.Evidence as of 2026-09-02Overview · GLOBE LIFE INC.
Globe Life Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides various life and supplemental health insurance products, and annuities to lower middle to middle income households in the United States. The company operates through four segments: Life Insurance, Supplemental Health Insurance, Annuities, and Investments. It offers whole, term, and other life insurance products; Medicare supplement and supplemental health insurance…
Management team
- Mr. Christopher K. Tyler · Executive VP & Chief Information OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. M. Shane Henrie · Corporate Senior VP & Chief Accounting OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Michael Clay Majors · Executive VP of Policy Acquisition & Chief Strategy OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Robert Brian Mitchell J.D. · Executive VP, General Counsel & Chief Risk OfficerFind on LinkedIn
Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.2 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
What the evidence shows
Evidence balance is Mixed (+0.2 of a possible +2; confidence high). Revenues in Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-31) were $ 1,599,730,000, up from $ 1,481,287,000 in Q2 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-07-31), and net income rose to $ 287,747,000 from $ 252,749,000 year-over-year. Diluted EPS in Q2 2026 was $ 3.65 versus $ 3.05 in Q2 2025, supported in part by a decline in weighted average diluted shares outstanding from 82,792,661 to 78,909,152 and a point-in-time drop in common shares outstanding from 89,819,840 as of 2024-07-31 to 76,849,447 as of 2026-07-31. Balance-sheet and market facts coexist: long-term noncurrent debt increased to $ 2,665,296,000 as of 2026-06-30 from $ 2,320,793,000 as of 2025-12-31, momentum readings are strong (momentum_12_1 +32.1%, momentum_6m +19.6%), and valuation metrics show a trailing P/FCF of 8.36 and a trailing P/E of 11.63.
What the debate changed
The desk did not drop any surviving claims; 97% of what was raised survived the debate and the overall Mixed read remained at +0.2. The committee did weaken the characterization of recent repurchase detail and some market-momentum framing — payments for repurchase of common stock of $ 264,544,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 were retained but labeled weakened, and momentum language was softened even though the numeric momentum metrics remain in the record. Those adjustments left the core fundamentals (revenues, net income, EPS, share-count reduction) and the main balance-sheet and valuation figures intact.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenues in the fiscal quarter 2026 Q2 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30) were $1,599,730,000, up from $1,481,287,000 in the fiscal quarter 2025 Q2 (2025-04-01 to 2025-06-30).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000320335-26-000216Net income in the fiscal quarter 2026 Q2 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30) was $287,747,000, up from $252,749,000 in the fiscal quarter 2025 Q2 (2025-04-01 to 2025-06-30).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000320335-26-000216Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
Momentum metrics are strong: momentum_12_1 is +32.1%, momentum_6m is +19.6%, momentum_3m is +14.3%, and cross-sectional ranks show rank_momentum_6m at the 79th percentile of 547 and rank_momentum_12_1 at the 72th percentile of 547 (as of 2026-09-01).
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-01weakened in debateTrend signals are mixed: a golden_cross is true, price is -3.5% versus the 50-day SMA, and price is +12.7% versus the 200-day SMA (as of 2026-09-01).
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-01Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
Ensign Peak Advisors, Inc is listed as the sole 13F-reported institutional holder with a position value of $595,926 as of 2026-03-31, and the reported value declined 35.7% quarter-over-quarter.
13F holdings · 1 filers · as of 2026-03-31The institutional holdings data notes that 13F filings carry a 45-day reporting lag and that the reported quarter is the latest REPORTED quarter, not a current book.
13F holdings · 1 filers · as of 2026-03-31Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
An article on 1 September 2026 framed Globe Life alongside Aflac and Prudential as companies with distinct exposure to shifting interest rate conditions.
News · kalkinemedia.com · 2026-09-01A filing reported by thelincolnianonline shows Jupiter Topco LLC purchased 34,767 shares of Globe Life during the second quarter, a position valued at about $6.22 million.
News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-09-01Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The model's implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate that today's price would justify is -10.8% per year (implied_growth = -0.108).
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeTrailing twelve-month free cash flow was $1,626,988,000 (fcf_ttm = 1626988000.0), which, with the current price, produces a price-to-FCF multiple of 8.36.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Several company-reported fundamentals point to improving operating performance: sequential year-over-year revenue, net income, and diluted EPS all rose in fiscal Q2 2026 (fundamentals-0, fundamentals-1, fundamentals-2), and the diluted share base has fallen (fundamentals-3, fundamentals-4) alongside active and recently authorized repurchase activity (fundamentals-6, news-7), which together strengthen per-share metrics. Market signals show strong multi-period momentum and a golden-cross technical picture (market-0, market-1), while valuation multiples appear inexpensive on trailing FCF and earnings (valuation-1, valuation-2), suggesting current price embeds conservative expectations relative to recent cash generation. The bull case acknowledges elevated debt and historical drawdown but views those as governance and capital-structure issues that are at least partially offset by buybacks, falling share count, and inclusion in broad ETFs that can support liquidity (fundamentals-5, valuation-3, valuation-4, ownership-2). Evidence strength: core accounting figures (revenues, net income, EPS, share counts) come from the company filing and are high strength; momentum and technical ranks are timely signal-derived and moderate strength; valuation multiples and FCF ttm are model outputs and moderate-to-high strength; debt point and historical drawdown are factual but reduce evidence strength for an unqualified favorable read.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.31
29 surviving claims rest on 16 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 28% of them, and 97% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The evidence set is moderately robust: 29 surviving claims drawing on 16 distinct sources gives some breadth, and a 97% survival rate from debate suggests strong internal consistency. However, one analyst accounts for 28% of the surviving claims, so a nontrivial share of the read depends on a single contributor and several key claims lean on a small number of filings and computed-signal feeds — treat the ensemble as informative but sensitive to a few source updates.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 1st of 2 in Insurance—Life (as of 2026-09-01).
90-day volatility ranks 1st of 2 in Insurance—Life (as of 2026-09-01).
dividend yield ranks 2nd of 2 in Insurance—Life (as of 2026-09-01).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
16 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.7 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash−0.2 to the score
2 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on GL Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.