GOOG
Alphabet Inc.Evidence as of 2026-09-12The desk's Snapshot
3 of 15 open to everyone · members see allRead the full desk report on GOOG
Seven analysts, the debate, the risk review, every claim cited. And the same for every name you hold.
Free plan, no credit card required. Silver opens the full report, $19.99 a month. AI-written · every claim cites a source · Insight, not advice.
Overview · Alphabet Inc.
Alphabet Inc. offers various products and platforms in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia-Pacific, Canada, and Latin America. It operates through Google Services, Google Cloud, and Other Bets segments. The Google Services segment provides products and services, including ads, Android, Chrome, hardware, Gmail, Google Drive, Google Maps, Google Photos, Google Play, Search, and YouTube. It is a…
Management team
- Ms. Amie Thuener O'Toole · Corporate Controller, Chief Accounting Officer & VPFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Anat Ashkenazi · Senior VP & CFOFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Philipp Schindler · Senior Vice President & Chief Business Officer of GoogleFind on LinkedIn
- Dr. Prabhakar Raghavan · Senior Vice President of Knowledge and Information - GoogleFind on LinkedIn
Start free to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it, not a rating or a recommendation.
−0.5 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled. The rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The evidence balance is Cautious (‑0.5) with high confidence. Revenues increased from $ 109,896,000,000 in Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-03-31) to $ 119,796,000,000 in Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-06-30), a rise of $ 9,900,000,000 (~ 9.0%), while net income grew from $ 62,578,000,000 to $ 112,193,000,000 over the same two quarters and diluted EPS moved from $ 5.11 to $ 9.11. Point-in-time balance-sheet measures show sizable growth between FY 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-12-31) and 2026-06-30: assets from $ 595,281,000,000 to $ 921,983,000,000, cash and cash equivalents from $ 30,708,000,000 to $ 55,911,000,000, and stockholders’ equity from $ 415,265,000,000 to $ 640,480,000,000.
Filings added explicit risk language about AI: the 10‑K (filed 5 February 2026) warns of shifting advertising dynamics and of “significant and increasing costs and new liabilities” to build AI infrastructure, including constraints on power, water, and land; long‑term debt noncurrent also rose to $ 98,165,000,000 as of 2026-06-30 (from $ 46,547,000,000 as of FY 2025). Market signals are mixed: 12‑1 momentum is + 70.2% (88th percentile) but recent 3‑month momentum is ‑5.9%, 90‑day annualized volatility is +33.7% (85th percentile), beta versus SPY is 1.35, a golden cross is present, and trailing twelve‑month dividend yield is +0.26%. Insider filings in the parsed window show total reported sales of $ 14.6M and net shares sold of 47,790 over 180 days, with no open‑market officer buys reported.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else (no outside knowledge, no browsing), so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC (revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter) and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenues rose from $109,896,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) to $119,796,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo), an increase of $9,900,000,000 (~9.0%).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001652044-26-000048Net income increased from $62,578,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) to $112,193,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo), a rise of $49,615,000,000.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001652044-26-000071Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full: its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet; its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
In the Form 10-K filed 5 February 2026, the company added risk language stating its belief that "AI is quickly reshaping the advertising industry, including how ads are delivered online," and that there is "no assurance that we will adapt effectively and competitively to meet this shift."
Item 1A risk-factor diff · 0001652044-26-000018 vs 0001652044-25-000014The Form 10-K filed 5 February 2026 added risk disclosures that the company is incurring "significant and increasing costs and new liabilities" to build AI-optimized infrastructure (including custom TPUs), is entering into "significant leasing arrangements with third party operators," and faces the possibility of "excess capacity" or additional liabilities if counterparties or vendors do not perform.
Item 1A risk-factor diff · 0001652044-26-000018 vs 0001652044-25-000014Reads the signal panel above (momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta) and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
As of 2026-09-11, the 3-month momentum is -5.9%.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-11weakened in debateAs of 2026-09-11, the 6-month momentum is +10.6% and ranks in the 53th percentile of the 558-stock research universe.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-11weakened in debateReads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
13F-reported institutional holdings total $902.92B as of the period ended 2026-03-31, with reported value down 9.9% quarter-over-quarter and 5,081 institutional holders.
13F holdings · 5081 filers · as of 2026-03-31Top reported institutional holders in the 13F snapshot (period ended 2026-03-31) include BlackRock, Inc. at $104.63B, VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC at $86.71B, and STATE STREET CORP at $53.27B (Vanguard listed as a new holder in this report).
13F holdings · 5081 filers · as of 2026-03-31Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Multiple headlines on 11 September 2026 reported that Alphabet shares traded up about 1.5–1.9% in the most recent session.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-11A separate 11 September 2026 headline noted Alphabet closed about +1.53% on the session.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-11Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5: who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
Total insider sales reported in the parsed window sum to “$14.6M” and net shares sold equal “-47790” over the 180-day window.
Form 4 · Saraci Marsida (VP, Chief Accounting Officer) · $0 code C · 2026-08-25Sundar Pichai (Chief Executive Officer) reported sales of “3703” shares with a reported aggregate value of “$1.3M” on 2026-08-25 (Form 4 filed), with the transaction reported under transaction code F.
Form 4 · Pichai Sundar (Chief Executive Officer) · $0 code C · 2026-08-25Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The filings on record don't carry four quarters of both operating cash flow and capital expenditure. IFRS filers report no common capex concept, so no FCF claim is made..
Debate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score. The argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Several contemporaneous data points jointly support a favorable read: fiscal Q2 2026 shows a notable increase in revenues (+~9%, fundamentals-0) together with a large jump in net income and diluted EPS (fundamentals-1, fundamentals-2), while point-in-time balance sheet metrics show material asset, cash, and equity growth versus year-end 2025 (fundamentals-5). Market breadth signals also favor the bull case: very strong 12‑month momentum (market-2) and a golden-cross technical condition versus the 50/200-day averages (market-6), plus multiple positive session headlines and specific coverage linking price action to investor interest in a new, easier-to-use AI offering (news-0, news-1, news-2, news-3). Ownership evidence shows substantial institutional and ETF inclusion (ownership-0, ownership-1, ownership-2), which financial advisors often note can support liquidity and price discovery. The bear points citing expanded risk language about AI costs, infrastructure constraints, rising long-term debt, short-term negative momentum, and clustered insider sales (filings-0 through filings-3, fundamentals-6, market-0, insider-0 through insider-4) are relevant cautions but are contested here on the grounds that the company’s reported revenue, profitability, and balance sheet expansions provide stronger contemporaneous operational evidence of financial strength.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
diversified0.29
38 surviving claims rest on 21 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 21% of them, and 96% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The read has moderate empirical depth — many claims (38) draw on a relatively small set of sources (21), and one analyst contributes a meaningful share, so individual viewpoints can sway the ensemble. High survival through debate (96%) increases confidence in the surviving statements, but source concentration and analyst dependence mean the set is still somewhat fragile to new or contrary primary evidence.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 2nd of 6 in Internet Content & Information (as of 2026-09-11).
90-day volatility ranks 6th of 6 in Internet Content & Information (as of 2026-09-11).
dividend yield ranks 2nd of 6 in Internet Content & Information (as of 2026-09-11).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment. When the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here (no outside knowledge, no browsing), and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
7 filings· 3 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data, not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.4 to the score
13 documents· 2 cited
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes−0.8 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash−0.2 to the score
3 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.5 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
9 filings· 2 cited
Insider filings
Parsed Forms 3/4/5 from EDGAR: named insiders, share counts, prices, and 10b5-1 plan state, with stated and inferred flags kept apart.
Read by Talbot−0.8 to the score
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only; it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal; the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
The full terminal on GOOG Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Get this for the names you actually hold
Every name in your portfolio, researched the same way, plus the one thing no sample can show: how each one sits inside what you already own.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.