GPC
GENUINE PARTS COEvidence as of 2026-10-13The desk's Snapshot
3 of 15 open to everyone · members see allRead the full desk report on GPC
Seven analysts, the debate, the risk review, every claim cited. And the same for every name you hold.
Free plan, no credit card required. Silver opens the full report, $19.99 a month. AI-written · every claim cites a source · Insight, not advice.
Overview · GENUINE PARTS CO
Genuine Parts Company distributes automotive replacement parts, and industrial parts and materials. It operates through Automotive Parts Group and Industrial Parts Group segments. The company distributes automotive replacement parts for hybrid and electric vehicles, trucks, SUVs, buses, motorcycles, recreational vehicles, farm vehicles, small engines, farm equipment, marine equipment, and heavy duty equipment; and ac…
Management team
- Ms. Lisa K. Hamilton · Senior Vice President of Total RewardsFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Christopher T. Galla · Senior VP, General Counsel & Corporate SecretaryFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Naveen Krishna · Executive VP and Chief Information & Digital OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. James R. Neill · ConsultantFind on LinkedIn
Start free to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it, not a rating or a recommendation.
−0.3 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled. The rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The evidence balance is Mixed ( -0.3 of a possible +2; was -0.3 before debate) · confidence high. Revenue was $ 6,264,940,000 in Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-17) and $ 6,536,951,000 in Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-17). Gross profit rose from $ 2,338,964,000 in Q1 2026 to $ 2,475,587,000 in Q2 2026, implying gross margins of about 37.4% and 37.9% respectively — a slight quarter-to-quarter expansion.
Net income for the three months ended 2026-06-30 (reported in Q2 2026) was $ 227,558,000 versus $ 254,880,000 for the comparable three months ended 2025-06-30, showing lower reported net income year-over-year on the period shown. Diluted EPS were $ 1.37 in Q1 2026 and $ 1.65 in Q2 2026. Long-term noncurrent debt increased from $ 3,498,423,000 as of 2025-12-31 to $ 3,976,648,000 as of 2026-06-30. Shares outstanding moved modestly lower across the periods shown, with weighted average diluted shares at 138,030,000 in Q1 2026 and 137,977,000 in Q2 2026 and point-in-time common shares at 137,859,758 as of 2026-07-17.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else (no outside knowledge, no browsing), so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC (revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter) and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue was 6,264,940,000 USD in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) and 6,536,951,000 USD in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000040987-26-000017Gross profit was 2,338,964,000 USD in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) and 2,475,587,000 USD in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo); this implies gross margin of about 37.4% in fiscal Q1 2026 (2,338,964,000 / 6,264,940,000) and about 37.9% in fiscal Q2 2026 (2,475,587,000 / 6,536,951,000), a slight quarter-to-quarter expansion on the figures shown.
XBRL companyfacts · 0000040987-26-000017Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full: its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet; its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
The risk-factor diff adds disclosure that in September 2025 one of the key vendors for the North America Automotive segment filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and states that such vendor bankruptcies could materially affect operations, including supply chain delays and inability to source replacement goods on comparable cost terms.
10-K filed 2026-02-20The risk-factor diff adds detailed risk language that the Company's supply chain modernization initiative requires substantial capital investment for real estate, construction and technology, and that delays or disruptions in executing the initiative could have a material adverse impact on business and results of operations.
10-K filed 2026-02-20Reads the signal panel above (momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta) and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
Beta versus SPY is 0.48 and correlation versus SPY is 0.19 as of 2026-10-12, indicating low market sensitivity and low co-movement with the S&P 500 on the measurement period.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-10-12Six-month momentum is +19.3% and ranks in the 79th percentile of the 881-stock research universe on 2026-10-12, showing relatively strong recent price performance over that horizon.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-10-12weakened in debateReads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
Institutional holders reported a combined position value of "$14.89B" in the 13F portfolio as of 2026-06-30, with total 13F-reported value up 19.0% quarter-over-quarter.
13F holdings · 1087 filers · as of 2026-06-30Large passive and institutional managers appear among the top reported 13F holders as of 2026-06-30: BlackRock, Inc. ($1.57B), VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC ($1.06B), and STATE STREET CORP ($908.0M), each showing double-digit quarter-over-quarter reported value increases (12.4%, 11.5%, and 15.6% respectively).
13F holdings · 1087 filers · as of 2026-06-30Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Press coverage reports that Genuine Parts plans to separate its automotive and industrial distribution operations into two independent, publicly traded companies by early 2027.
News · simplywall.st · 2026-10-08Multiple outlets are running pieces assessing whether the market is repricing Genuine Parts after a recent pullback and comparing its valuation versus peers.
News · kalkinemedia.com · 2026-10-06Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5: who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
CARRUTHERS COURT D (Director) reported an acquisition of 11,935 shares on 2026-09-08 with reported value "$0"; the filing shows no trading-plan flag.
Form 4 · CARRUTHERS COURT D (Director) · $0 code A · 2026-09-08CARRUTHERS COURT D (Director) reported an acquisition of 29,838 shares on 2026-09-08 with reported value "$0"; the filing shows no trading-plan flag.
Form 4 · CARRUTHERS COURT D (Director) · $0 code A · 2026-09-08Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The model shows an implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate of 0.6789 (67.89%) that today's price would justify under the stated discount and terminal assumptions.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closePrice-to-FCF (trailing twelve months) is 151.92, indicating the market price equals about 152 times last twelve months' FCF.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score. The argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
The bull case emphasizes company-reported operating results and market positioning from the provided evidence: sequential revenue and gross-profit expansion in fiscal Q1→Q2 2026, higher reported diluted EPS quarter-to-quarter, a modest reduction in share count that supports per-share metrics, plus market signals of low correlation/beta, strong six-month momentum, a meaningful dividend yield, and rising 13F-reported institutional positions. Several negative points rely on context that weakens their evidentiary force: the long-term debt increase is a balance-sheet snapshot without accompanying liquidity or covenant detail; trailing FCF and the implied FCF-growth model hinge on a low reported FCF figure that may reflect timing, nonrecurring items, or separation-related costs called out in filings; and many expanded risk-factor disclosures describe potential outcomes tied to a planned separation and supply-chain initiatives rather than documented operational failures. Taken together, the audited filings and market ownership signals provide relatively strong support for a favorable read, while some bear points rest on snapshots, modeling assumptions, or generic risk language with less direct linkage to current operating momentum.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.32
39 surviving claims rest on 18 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 15% of them, and 97% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The evidence set is moderately robust: claims draw from a modestly broad set of primary sources rather than a single document, so multiple independent records support the read. However the desk shows some analyst concentration and an unusually high debate survival rate, which reduces the effective independence of challenge — this means the read can carry informational weight but should be treated as somewhat brittle on issues where few distinct documentary sources or independent checks exist.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 2nd of 5 in Specialty Retail (as of 2026-10-12).
90-day volatility ranks 4th of 5 in Specialty Retail (as of 2026-10-12).
dividend yield ranks 1st of 5 in Specialty Retail (as of 2026-10-12).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment. When the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here (no outside knowledge, no browsing), and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
11 filings· 2 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data, not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.3 to the score
10 documents· 3 cited
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes−1.0 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash+0.2 to the score
3 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.4 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
3 filings· 1 cited
Insider filings
Parsed Forms 3/4/5 from EDGAR: named insiders, share counts, prices, and 10b5-1 plan state, with stated and inferred flags kept apart.
Read by Talbot+0.0 to the score
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only; it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal; the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
The full terminal on GPC Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Get this for the names you actually hold
Every name in your portfolio, researched the same way, plus the one thing no sample can show: how each one sits inside what you already own.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.