HBAN
Huntington Bancshares IncorporatedEvidence as of 2026-09-03Overview · Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated operates as the bank holding company for The Huntington National Bank that provides commercial, consumer, and mortgage banking services in the United States. The company operates through four segments: Consumer and Business Banking; Commercial Banking; Vehicle Finance; and Regional Banking and The Huntington Private Client Group (RBHPCG). The Consumer and Business Banking segment of…
Management team
- Ms. Marcy C. Hingst · General CounselFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Rajeev Syal · Senior EVP & Chief Human Resources OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Julie C. Tutkovics · Senior EVP and Chief Marketing & Communications OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Jana J. Litsey · Senior EVP & General CounselFind on LinkedIn
Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.1 on a −2 to +2 scale — was +0.2 before the debate changed the read.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The desk finds a mixed evidence balance (Mixed, +0.1 of a possible +2; was +0.2 before debate) with high confidence in the surviving claims. Customer revenue rose sequentially from USD 351,000,000 in Q1 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-03-31) to USD 377,000,000 in Q2 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-06-30) and USD 424,000,000 in Q3 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-09-30), reaching USD 472,000,000 in Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-03-31).
Reported net income climbed through mid‑2025 — USD 527,000,000 in Q1 2025, USD 536,000,000 in Q2 2025 and USD 629,000,000 in Q3 2025 — then fell to USD 523,000,000 in Q1 2026. A simple net‑income‑to‑customer‑revenue ratio fell over the span from about 150.1% in Q1 2025 to roughly 110.8% in Q1 2026, while shares outstanding rose materially from 1,456,811,621 as of 2025-03-31 to 2,027,130,587 as of 2026-03-31. The company reported USD 150,000,000 of repurchases in Q1 2026 versus USD 0.0 in the prior‑year comparable quarter, and long‑term debt rose from USD 16,374,000,000 as of 2024-12-31 to USD 21,594,000,000 as of 2026-03-31.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue from customers rose quarter-to-quarter in the sample: USD 351,000,000 for fiscal Q1 2025 (2025-01-01 to 2025-03-31, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000049196-25-000038Revenue from customers was USD 377,000,000 for fiscal Q2 2025 (2025-04-01 to 2025-06-30, 3mo), up from the prior quarter.
XBRL companyfacts · 0000049196-25-000063Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
As of 2026-09-02, HBAN's 12-month momentum (12_1) is +13.6%, which ranks at the 47th percentile of the 547-stock research universe.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02weakened in debateHBAN shows shorter-term positive momentum: 3-month momentum is +6.9% and 6-month momentum is +2.3%, with the 6-month momentum at the 42th percentile of the universe.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02weakened in debateReads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00, the ETF with symbol IVV held HBAN at a weight of 0.06% of that fund.
ETF constituents · market dataMembership in IVV at a weight of 0.06% of fund provides factual exposure context showing HBAN is included in a major broad-market ETF at a small position size as of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00.
ETF constituents · market dataReads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Coverage on 2 September 2026 includes a hiring announcement that Huntington National Bank appointed Ameesh Vakharia as executive vice president and chief marketing and digital products officer.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-02Coverage on 1 September 2026 reports that Huntington Insurance Inc. was named a 2026 Best Place to Work in Insurance by Business Insurance magazine.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-01Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The model implies a free cash flow (FCF) growth rate of 12.09% that today's price would justify under the stated discount and terminal assumptions.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeTrailing twelve-month free cash flow (FCF) is $1,414,000,000.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Sequential customer revenue increases across four reported quarters (fundamentals-0 through fundamentals-3) constitute a strong, company-specific signal of top-line momentum. Market signals (market-0, market-1, market-2) show contemporaneous positive price momentum and a constructive technical posture (golden cross), while income characteristics (market-4) and conservative reported trailing earnings and FCF multiples (valuation-3, valuation-2, valuation-1) provide moderate-strength corroboration that the market is pricing meaningful cash generation. The claim about recent share repurchases (fundamentals-7) is a limited positive corporate-action data point, but the material increase in shares outstanding and rising long-term debt (fundamentals-6, fundamentals-8) are valid counterclaims whose evidence strength I rate as strong for dilution/debt trends; these create a mixed overall profile. Taken jointly, the strongest supporting evidence is revenue momentum and supportive market/valuation metrics (strong-to-moderate), while the strongest contested evidence is balance-sheet and capital-structure erosion (strong). Financial advisors often note that favorable revenue traction paired with reasonable valuation metrics can be meaningful, though diversification principles indicate weighing capital-structure changes as part of any educational assessment.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.39
27 surviving claims rest on 12 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 33% of them, and 93% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The read is moderately supported: 27 surviving claims draw on a dozen distinct sources, which gives some breadth, but one analyst accounts for a third of the surviving claims so a chunk of weight is concentrated. High survival through debate (93%) means claims were mostly internally consistent; however source concentration and analyst dependence reduce how much confidence to place on any single emergent narrative without further independent corroboration.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
15 filings· 2 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.2 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash+0.2 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score
5 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on HBAN Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.