Featured researchA real report from the desk, on public data — this is what every report looks like.

HUM

HUMANA INCEvidence as of 2026-09-03

Overview · HUMANA INC

Humana Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a health and well-being company in the United States. It operates through two segments, Insurance and CenterWell. The company offers medical and supplemental benefit plans to individuals. It also has a contract with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to administer the Limited Income Newly Eligible Transition prescription drug plan program; and contracts…

SectorHealthcare
IndustryHealthcare Plans
Typeequity
ExchangeNYSE
Employees67,100
www.humana.com

Management team

Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.

Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.

Moneyta sentiment

Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.

Mixedhigh confidence
−2 · strongly unfavorable0 · balanced+2 · strongly favorable

+0.3 on a −2 to +2 scale.

What builds the score

Fundamentals
+0.5
Filings and risk
+0.0
Ownership and flow
+0.5

Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.

News tonecontext · not scored+1.0 observed
5 favorable0 neutral0 unfavorableacross 3 outlets

Editor's note

Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.

GoodwinAI editor

What the evidence shows

Mixed (+0.3 of a possible +2; was +0.3 before debate) · confidence high. Revenues ticked up modestly through fiscal Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-03-31), moving from $32,112,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-03-31) to $32,388,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-06-30) and $32,649,000,000 in Q3 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-09-30) before rising to $39,648,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026. Operating income and net income showed large intra-year swings (operating income: $2,014,000,000 → $1,098,000,000 → $400,000,000 → $1,754,000,000; net income: $1,244,000,000 → $545,000,000 → $195,000,000 → $1,186,000,000), and diluted EPS mirrored that pattern ($10.30 → $4.51 → $1.62 → $9.83). Share-count movements were small (around 120.7 million outstanding down to 120.06 million by 2026-03-31), reported buybacks rose from $9,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2025 to $107,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026, long-term debt was roughly in the $12.3–12.7 billion range with $12,274,000,000 as of 2026-03-31, reported cash was $4,951,000,000 exceeding reported long-term debt of $2,600,000,000 on the dates given, and valuation slices show P/FCF 5.99, EV/EBITDA 7.68, P/E 15.27, FCF TTM $8,079,000,000 and an implied FCF growth of -17.76%.

What the debate changed

No surviving claims were dropped or weakened in the debate, so the desk’s read did not shift on numeric fundamentals or on the evidence balance. The analysts contested interpretation at the margins, but the chair did not remove or reduce any of the core numeric claims, so the original evidence set and its Mixed (+0.3) characterization remain intact.

How this note was made

every stage ran before the note was written
Analystsread the evidence
Debatebull ⇄ bear ×2
Chairrules on every claim
Riskstress-tests the read
Sentimentweighs what survived
Editorwrites the note

Analyst desk

Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.

MercerAI fundamentals analyst
+1.0

Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.

Revenues rose modestly across fiscal Q1 2025 (period ended 31 March 2025) to fiscal Q3 2025 (period ended 30 September 2025): $32,112,000,000 → $32,388,000,000 → $32,649,000,000, then increased to $39,648,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (period ended 31 March 2026).

XBRL companyfacts · 0000049071-25-000023

Operating income and net income moved materially quarter-to-quarter: operating income was $2,014,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2025 (period ended 31 March 2025), $1,098,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2025 (period ended 30 June 2025), $400,000,000 in fiscal Q3 2025 (period ended 30 September 2025), and $1,754,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (period ended 31 March 2026); net income was $1,244,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2025, $545,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2025, $195,000,000 in fiscal Q3 2025, and $1,186,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026.

XBRL companyfacts · 0000049071-25-000023
OakesAI filings and risk analyst
+0.0

Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.

Which filings the desk reads

The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.

An 8-K was filed on 1 September 2026.

8-K filed 2026-09-01

The provided evidence record for that filing shows the parse status as 'pending' and does not include parsed content to extract risk-factor changes, management discussion text, or exhibit details.

8-K filed 2026-09-01
NashAI market signals analyst
no data on file

Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.

No computed signal history for this symbol yet — signals need roughly 70 trading days of price history.

EllisAI ownership and flow analyst
+0.0

Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.

As of 2026-09-02, HUMANA INC appears as a holding in the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) with a weight of 0.07% of that fund.

ETF constituents · market data

The reported 0.07% weight indicates HUMANA INC represents a small single-stock exposure within IVV as of 2026-09-02.

ETF constituents · market data
YatesAI news analyst
+1.0

Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.

Humana's Board declared a cash dividend of $0.885 per share payable on November 27, 2026 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on October 30, 2026 (press release dated September 02, 2026).

News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-02

Coverage from kalkinemedia examined whether a DaVita–Humana deal is unlocking additional value, framing the story as company-specific coverage about the partnership and its implications.

News · kalkinemedia.com · 2026-09-02
TalbotAI insider activity analyst
no data on file

Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.

No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.

ArcherAI valuation analyst
+0.0

Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.

The model calculates an implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate of -17.76% (implied_growth = -0.1776), meaning today's price would be consistent with a declining FCF profile under the stated discount and terminal assumptions.

Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD close

Price-to-free-cash-flow (P/FCF) on trailing twelve months FCF is 5.99.

Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD close

Debate and risk review

A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.

Debate1 round · 5 claims contested

A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.

The bull case

The evidence set shows expanding revenues into fiscal Q1 2026, consistent share count modestly down, and a material increase in cash paid for share repurchases—signals that operational scale and capital return priorities improved over the reported periods. Valuation multiples (P/FCF 5.99, EV/EBITDA 7.68, P/E 15.27) and a large trailing twelve-month FCF ($8.08B) indicate the market pricing relative to generated cash flows is compressive, which, together with reported cash exceeding long-term debt, supports a favorable liquidity and valuation profile. Company-level news items (dividend declaration, DaVita partnership expansion, CMO hire with digital health/value-based care experience, and reiterated FY2026 guidance) provide company-specific catalysts and investor communications that align with operational focus on value-based care and shareholder returns. These pieces jointly form a bull-leaning read because improved revenue, meaningful cash flow, active buybacks/dividend actions, and comparatively low multiples are internally consistent signals of financial strength and capital allocation toward shareholders.

The bear case

Chair's verdict, claim by claim

Humana's Board declared a cash dividend of $0.885 per share payable on November 27, 2026 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on October 30, 2026 (press release dated September 02, 2026).Press-release reporting in the evidence set documents a $0.885/share dividend payable Nov 27, 2026 with the cited record date.upheld
Coverage from kalkinemedia examined whether a DaVita–Humana deal is unlocking additional value, framing the story as company-specific coverage about the partnership and its implications.Coverage from kalkinemedia in the evidence set frames the DaVita–Humana deal as potentially unlocking value; the claim reflects that coverage.upheld
An 8-K was filed on 1 September 2026.An 8-K dated 1 September 2026 is present in the evidence set as claimed.upheld
Risk review

Fragility · computed, not argued

balanced0.33

22 surviving claims rest on 11 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 27% of them, and 100% of what the desk raised survived the debate.

The evidence set rests on a modest number of distinct sources but supports a relatively large bundle of surviving claims; with one analyst supplying over a quarter of those claims and the desk retaining everything post‑debate, the read carries moderate source concentration and some analyst dependence. That combination raises fragility — the overall picture is informative but individual claims would lose weight if the few dominant sources or that analyst's inputs were undermined or supplemented by new filings.

Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers

Context

Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.

The street's viewAnalyst consensus · third-party · 2026-09-02
Buy Hold Sell Target

Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.

What this was built from

Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.

12 filings· 1 cited

SEC XBRL filings

Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.

Read by Mercer+0.5 to the score

1 document

SEC filing documents

The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.

Read by Oakes+0.0 to the score

1 holdings record

Fund holdings

Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.

Read by Ellis+0.5 to the score

8 headlines· 2 cited

News coverage

Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.

Read by Yatesnothing survived

1 computation

Valuation inputs

TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.

Read by Archercontext only

1 record· 0 cited

Company profile

Sector, industry and company details.

1 record· 0 cited

Analyst consensus

Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.

Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.

Social sentiment

Crowd chatter as an evidence stream.

Coming soon

Aggregated tone from public social feeds will join the desk as its own evidence stream — read by its own analyst, contested in the same debate, and shown with the same sourcing as every other claim. Until it earns that bar, nothing renders here.

RPT-3aa74d72evidence 06577da3caebgenerated 9/3/2026, 12:34:25 AM · 94s13 model calls View trail

Written by AI, checked against sources

The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.

Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.

Get this for the tickers you actually hold

Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.

The full terminal on HUM Gold

Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.

Unlock

Institutional holders

Net institutional flow, Q/Q

Largest holder position

Insider buys, 90 days

Clustered insider value

Street target range

The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.

Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.