IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.Evidence as of 2026-09-03Overview · Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. operates as an automated electronic broker worldwide. The company specializes in routing, executing, and processing trades in stocks, options, futures, foreign exchange instruments, bonds, mutual funds, exchange traded funds (ETFs), metals, and cryptocurrencies. It also custodies and services accounts for hedge and mutual funds, ETFs, registered investment advisors, proprietary trading…
Management team
- Mr. Thomas Pechy Peterffy · Founder & ChairmanFind on LinkedIn
- Dr. Thomas A. J. Frank Ph.D. · Executive VP & Chief Information OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Paul Jonathan Brody · CFO, Treasurer, Secretary & DirectorFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Milan Galik · President, CEO & DirectorFind on LinkedIn
Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.4 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The desk rates the evidence balance as Constructive (+0.4 of a possible +2; was +0.4 before debate) with high confidence. Revenue for the fiscal quarter ended 2026-06-30 (Q2 2026) was $ 760,000,000, up from $ 699,000,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 2026-03-31 (Q1 2026) and from $ 603,000,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 2025-09-30 (Q3 2025). Diluted EPS for Q2 2026 was $ 0.69, versus $ 0.59 in Q1 2026 and $ 0.59 in Q3 2025, while weighted‑average diluted shares rose to 450,088,032 in Q2 2026 from 448,369,291 in Q1 2026 and 446,528,983 in Q3 2025.
Point‑in‑time liquidity and balance sheet measures show cash and cash equivalents of $ 7,711,000,000 as of 2026-06-30 and total assets of $ 247,309,000,000 with total liabilities at $ 225,059,000,000, producing stockholders’ equity of $ 5,904,000,000. Market and valuation snapshots in the packet show an equity price of $ 89.12 as of 2026-09-02, a trailing twelve‑month P/E of 37.45, negative enterprise value of -$ 3,947,315,263, and trailing twelve‑month operating cash flow of $ 6,955,000,000. News coverage in early September 2026 documented a partnership with Daol, multiple reports of a 23% year‑over‑year rise in client DARTs in August 2026, and recurring press themes linking the company to AI narratives; IVV held 0.06% of the security as of 2026-09-02.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue for the single fiscal quarter ended 30 June 2026 (fiscal Q2 2026, 2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30) was $760,000,000, up from $699,000,000 in the single fiscal quarter ended 31 March 2026 (fiscal Q1 2026, 2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31) and from $603,000,000 in the single fiscal quarter ended 30 September 2025 (fiscal Q3 2025, 2025-07-01 to 2025-09-30).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001381197-26-000147Diluted earnings per share for the single fiscal quarter ended 30 June 2026 (fiscal Q2 2026) was $0.69, compared with $0.59 in the single fiscal quarter ended 31 March 2026 (fiscal Q1 2026) and $0.59 in the single fiscal quarter ended 30 September 2025 (fiscal Q3 2025).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001381197-26-000147Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
No computed signal history for this symbol yet — signals need roughly 70 trading days of price history.
Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 2026-09-02, the ETF IVV held 0.06% of its fund in the security.
ETF constituents · market dataThe membership record for the security in IVV is dated 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00 in the provided data.
ETF constituents · market dataReads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Multiple outlets covered Interactive Brokers' announced collaboration with Daol Investment & Securities that links Korean investors to its global trading infrastructure (headline published 2 September 2026).
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-02A separate outlet framed the same Daol partnership as a potential change to Interactive Brokers' white‑label strategy (headline published 2 September 2026).
News · simplywall.st · 2026-09-02Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The equity price used in this evidence is $89.12 as of 2026-09-02.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeReported cash and cash equivalents are $7,711,000,000 as of 2026-06-30.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
The evidence shows sequential revenue and EPS improvement (fundamentals-0, fundamentals-1) alongside a large increase in cash and very strong trailing operating cash flow (fundamentals-3, valuation-2). Those items jointly produce a net-negative enterprise value (valuation-4), which in educational terms signals substantial reported liquid resources relative to equity value and reduces the enterprise-level funding needs implied by the market price. Rising total assets and liabilities are accompanied by higher stockholders' equity (fundamentals-4, fundamentals-5), suggesting balance-sheet growth rather than pure deterioration. In response to bear points, the modest increase in diluted shares (fundamentals-2) is small relative to the EPS uplift and cash accumulation, and the headline P/E (valuation-3) is an incomplete valuation signal here because it sits alongside unusually strong operating cash flow and net cash on the balance sheet (valuation-7).
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.38
24 surviving claims rest on 11 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 33% of them, and 96% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
Most surviving claims are anchored in a small set of primary documents and a few news outlets, so the read is informative but vulnerable to source-concentration bias. The single heaviest analyst supplying one-third of surviving claims and the very high survival rate from the desk debate mean these conclusions carried through review with little pushback — treat them as well‑examined but not widely corroborated beyond the limited sources.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
18 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.8 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on IBKR Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.