JNJ
Johnson & JohnsonEvidence as of 2026-09-15The desk's Snapshot
3 of 15 open to everyone · members see allRead the full desk report on JNJ
Seven analysts, the debate, the risk review, every claim cited. And the same for every name you hold.
Free plan, no credit card required. Silver opens the full report, $19.99 a month. AI-written · every claim cites a source · Insight, not advice.
Overview · Johnson & Johnson
Johnson & Johnson, together with its subsidiaries, researches, develops, manufactures, and sells various products in the healthcare field worldwide. The company's Consumer Health segment provides skin health/beauty products under the AVEENO, CLEAN & CLEAR, DR. CI:LABO, NEUTROGENA, and OGX brands; baby care products under the JOHNSON'S and AVEENO Baby brands; oral care products under the LISTERINE brand; TYLENOL aceta…
Management team
- Mr. Joseph J. Wolk CPA · Executive VP & CFOFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Elizabeth Forminard J.D. · Executive VP & Chief Legal OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. James Swanson · Executive VP & Chief Information OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Timothy Schmid · Executive VP & Worldwide Chairman of MedTechFind on LinkedIn
Start free to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it, not a rating or a recommendation.
−0.2 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled. The rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
Evidence balance is Mixed ( -0.2 of a possible +2; was -0.2 before debate) and confidence is high. Sequential operational results show revenue from contracts rising from $24,062,000,000 in Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-17) to $25,310,000,000 in Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-17), gross profit up from $15,956,000,000 to $17,259,000,000, and net income rising from $5,235,000,000 to $5,534,000,000; diluted EPS moved from $2.14 to $2.27 while weighted‑average diluted shares were essentially flat. The company recorded $4,028,000,000 of cash payments to repurchase common stock in Q1 2026, long‑term noncurrent debt fell by $2,094,000,000 between 2025-12-28 and 2026-06-28, cash and cash equivalents declined by $1,266,000,000 in Q2 2026, and total stockholders’ equity rose by $3,785,000,000 over the quarter.
Regulatory and filing evidence shows FY 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-02-06) worldwide sales of $94.2 billion, with new products introduced in the past five years accounting for ~ 25% of 2025 sales and R&D at $14.7 billion; the 2025 10‑K quantifies the STELARA sales decline as about 6.2% on worldwide operational sales and ~ 10.4% within Innovative Medicine. Market and news signals include a reported mid‑stage failure for JNJ‑5120/PIPE‑307 on 14 September 2026, positive technical trend signals (a golden cross, price +1.3% above the 50‑day SMA and +12.7% above the 200‑day SMA as of 14 September 2026), elevated short‑ and medium‑term volatility, and valuation metrics such as trailing P/E of 30.2, price/FCF of 64.42, EV/EBITDA of 20.79 and market capitalization of $641,804,194,353.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else (no outside knowledge, no browsing), so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC (revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter) and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue from contracts rose sequentially from $24,062,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2025-12-29 to 2026-03-29, 3mo) to $25,310,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-03-30 to 2026-06-28, 3mo), an increase of $1,248,000,000 (+5.2%).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000200406-26-000087Gross profit increased sequentially from $15,956,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2025-12-29 to 2026-03-29, 3mo) to $17,259,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-03-30 to 2026-06-28, 3mo), an increase of $1,303,000,000 (+8.2%).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000200406-26-000087Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full: its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet; its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
The Companys Form 10-K (filed 2026-02-11) reports worldwide sales of $94.2 billion for fiscal 2025, an increase of 6.0% versus 2024, with volume +8.4%, price -3.1% and currency +0.7%.
10-K filed 2026-02-11The Form 10-K (filed 2026-02-11) states that new products introduced within the past five years accounted for approximately 25% of 2025 sales and that the Company invested $14.7 billion in research and development in 2025.
10-K filed 2026-02-11Reads the signal panel above (momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta) and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
As of 14 September 2026, 3-month momentum is +10.6% and 6-month momentum is +10.9%, with the 12-month (12_1) momentum at +55.5% and ranked in the 85th percentile of the 559-stock research universe.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-14weakened in debateTechnical trend signals show a golden cross is present, price is +1.3% above the 50-day SMA and +12.7% above the 200-day SMA as of 14 September 2026.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-14Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
Institutional holders reported total JNJ holdings valued at $427.05B for the reported 13F quarter ended 2026-03-31 (13F filings carry a 45-day reporting lag).
13F holdings · 4597 filers · as of 2026-03-31Top institutional holders in that 13F included BlackRock, Inc. at $52.16B and VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC at $38.28B (values as reported for the 2026-03-31 13F period).
13F holdings · 4597 filers · as of 2026-03-31Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Multiple headlines report Contineum Therapeutics announced that Johnson & Johnson’s mid‑stage trial of JNJ‑5120 (PIPE‑307) failed to meet its primary endpoint, and at least one article links that result to a sharp after‑hours move in Contineum’s stock on 14 September 2026.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-14A Contineum press release published 14 September 2026 publicly reported the phase 2 results for JNJ‑5120/PIPE‑307 for the treatment of major depressive disorder.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-14Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5: who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
Joaquin Duato (CEO and Chairman of the Board) reported multiple transactions dated 2026-08-13 and 2026-08-05 showing sales of $5.5M (20,976 shares), $26.7M (102,315 shares), $10.8M (41,957 shares) and $1.7M (6,523 shares); the 2026-08-13 filing also reports a separate 'code M' entry valued at $14.3M for 123,291 shares; the filing's trading_plan field is null for these entries.
Form 4 · Duato Joaquin (CEO and Chairman of the Board) · $14.3M code M · 2026-08-13Timothy Schmid (EVP, WW Chair, MedTech) reported transactions dated 2026-09-02 that show sales of $3.0M (11,070 shares) and $6.2M (22,527 shares) alongside two 'code M' entries valued at $1.5M (11,070 shares) and $3.4M (22,527 shares); the filing's trading_plan field is null for these entries.
Form 4 · Schmid Timothy (EVP, WW Chair, MedTech) · $1.5M code M · 2026-09-02Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The model shows an implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate of 40.33% that today's price would justify under the stated discount and terminal assumptions.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closePrice-to-free-cash-flow (price/FCF) on trailing twelve months FCF is 64.42.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score. The argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Sequential quarterly fundamentals show increasing revenue, gross profit, net income and diluted EPS, alongside active capital returns (noted share repurchases) and a measurable reduction in long‑term debt; these items jointly indicate improving near‑term operating cash generation and balance‑sheet leverage metrics. Market signals — positive momentum across 3/6/12‑month windows, a golden‑cross technical setup, sizable institutional ownership and meaningful ETF inclusion — reflect broad investor demand and price discovery supporting the fundamental improvement. The company’s 2025 Form 10‑K documents meaningful R&D investment and that new products introduced in the prior five years account for ~25% of sales, which supports a narrative that recent growth is at least partly driven by commercialized innovation rather than one‑off tailwinds. Counterpoints cited by bearish claims (high valuation multiples, insider selling, a mid‑stage trial miss reported in third‑party outlets, and added risk‑factor language) are tangible but can be contextualized: valuation metrics are explicit and strong evidence of premium pricing pressure; insider sales and discrete trial coverage are documented but represent episodic signals; and the 10‑K risk‑factor changes are a reliable disclosure of heightened stated risks even as stockholders’ equity and debt trends show improving capital structure. Evidence strengths vary: the sequential financials and 10‑K filings are primary, high‑strength sources; market momentum, institutional holdings and ETF weights are medium‑strength market indicators; valuation metrics are strong and unambiguous; news and insider filings are medium strength but more event‑specific and potentially transitory.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.32
42 surviving claims rest on 21 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 21% of them, and 99% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The read rests on a moderate breadth of sources (21 distinct references) but a nontrivial dependence on a single analyst (the heaviest carries about one-fifth of surviving claims). The very high debate survival rate (99%) implies few internal challenges to these claims, which raises the possibility of under‑tested assumptions — treat the set as informational but verify critical datapoints independently before overweighting them in any analysis.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 3rd of 10 in Drug Manufacturers—General (as of 2026-09-14).
6-month relative strength ranks 4th of 10 in Drug Manufacturers—General (as of 2026-09-14).
90-day volatility ranks 9th of 10 in Drug Manufacturers—General (as of 2026-09-14).
dividend yield ranks 9th of 10 in Drug Manufacturers—General (as of 2026-09-14).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment. When the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here (no outside knowledge, no browsing), and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
11 filings· 2 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data, not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.8 to the score
13 documents· 3 cited
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes+0.2 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash+0.1 to the score
3 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.8 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
7 filings· 2 cited
Insider filings
Parsed Forms 3/4/5 from EDGAR: named insiders, share counts, prices, and 10b5-1 plan state, with stated and inferred flags kept apart.
Read by Talbot−1.0 to the score
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only; it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal; the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
The full terminal on JNJ Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Get this for the names you actually hold
Every name in your portfolio, researched the same way, plus the one thing no sample can show: how each one sits inside what you already own.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.