KHC
The Kraft Heinz CompanyEvidence as of 2026-09-17The desk's Snapshot
3 of 15 open to everyone · members see allRead the full desk report on KHC
Seven analysts, the debate, the risk review, every claim cited. And the same for every name you hold.
Free plan, no credit card required. Silver opens the full report, $19.99 a month. AI-written · every claim cites a source · Insight, not advice.
Overview · The Kraft Heinz Company
The Kraft Heinz Company, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and markets food and beverage products in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and internationally. Its products include condiments and sauces, cheese and dairy products, meals, meats, refreshment beverages, coffee, and other grocery products. The company also offers spices and other seasonings. It sells its products through its own sales…
Management team
- Mr. Pedro Navio · Executive VP & President of North AmericaFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Cory Onell · Executive VP and Chief Omnichannel Sales & Asia Emerging Markets OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Marcos Eloi Lima · Executive VP and Global Chief Procurement & Sustainability OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Andre Maciel · Executive VP & Global CFOFind on LinkedIn
Start free to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it, not a rating or a recommendation.
−0.6 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled. The rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
What the evidence shows
The surviving record yields a cautious evidence balance ( -0.6) with high confidence. The company reported a large operating loss of - $6,431,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-08-01) and net income swung from a profit of $798,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-05-02) to a loss of - $5,460,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026. Stockholders’ equity declined from $41,923,000,000 as of 2026-03-28 to $36,006,000,000 as of 2026-06-27, while gross profit has trended down across recent reported quarters ($2,219,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026; $2,028,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026; $1,990,000,000 in fiscal Q3 2025). Market and ownership signals coexist with these fundamentals: trailing twelve‑month dividend yield is + 6.47%, 90‑day volatility is + 31.0%, institutional 13F‑reported holdings totaled $25.23B as of 2026-06-30 with Berkshire Hathaway holding about $7.69B, and trailing twelve‑month free cash flow is $1,945,000,000 (FCF per share $1.64, price‑to‑FCF 15.08).
What the debate changed
The desk’s debate left the evidence balance unchanged; nothing material was dropped or weakened. Analysts argued over the interpretation of the large Q2 operating loss and the drop in equity, but the surviving claims and filings held: the pause of the announced Separation, the company’s disclosure of roughly $20.9 billion of senior notes outstanding, and risk language about changing consumer preferences and the FD&C color commitment remain on record.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else (no outside knowledge, no browsing), so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC (revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter) and reports which way the trend is running.
The company reported a large operating loss of -$6,431,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026, (2026-03-29 to 2026-06-27, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001637459-26-000054Net income moved from a profit of $798,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2025-12-28 to 2026-03-28, 3mo) to a loss of -$5,460,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-03-29 to 2026-06-27, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001637459-26-000022Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full: its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet; its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
The company added a risk highlighting that changing consumer preferences, including those potentially associated with weight-loss drugs, could reduce demand for its products and materially and adversely affect its financial condition and operating results (Annual Report on Form 10-K filed 12 February 2026).
10-K filed 2026-02-12The company disclosed a public commitment announced in 2025 to remove FD&C colors from its U.S. portfolio by the end of 2027 and added a risk that failing to achieve, being perceived to fail, or improperly reporting progress toward that goal could adversely affect its brand image (Annual Report on Form 10-K filed 12 February 2026).
10-K filed 2026-02-12Reads the signal panel above (momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta) and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
Trailing twelve‑month dividend yield is +6.47% and that dividend yield ranks in the 97th percentile of the 561‑stock research universe on 2026-09-16.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-1690‑day annualized volatility is +31.0%, 30‑day annualized volatility is +29.2%, and volatility versus the stock's own history is at the 98th percentile of the 561‑stock research universe on 2026-09-16.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-16Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
Institutional 13F-reported holdings total $25.23B as of 2026-06-30 (13F data carry a reporting lag).
13F holdings · 1123 filers · as of 2026-06-30Berkshire Hathaway Inc is the largest 13F-reported holder with a reported value of $7.69B as of 2026-06-30.
13F holdings · 1123 filers · as of 2026-06-30Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Recent headlines exist but none are company-specific — market-wide stories and rating chatter are excluded.
Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5: who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
CAHILLANE STEVEN A (Chief Executive Officer) reported an open-market purchase of 213,106 shares for a reported aggregate value of "$5.0M" on 12 May 2026 (the Form 4 filing shows no trading-plan flag); implied price ≈ $23.47/share based on the reported amounts.
Form 4 · CAHILLANE STEVEN A (Chief Executive Officer) · $5.0M bought · 2026-05-12Frost Diana (Glbl Chief Growth Officer) reported a sale of 18,502 shares for a reported aggregate value of "$426k" on 18 June 2026 (the Form 4 filing shows no trading-plan flag); implied price ≈ $23.03/share based on the reported amounts.
Form 4 · Frost Diana (Glbl Chief Growth Officer) · $426k sold · 2026-06-18Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The implied free-cash-flow growth rate that today's price would justify is 0.0231 (2.31%).
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeTrailing twelve-month free cash flow is $1,945,000,000, with FCF per share of $1.64 and a price-to-FCF of 15.08.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score. The argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Several claims jointly support a favorable read: trailing free cash flow is positive ($1.945B ttm) with a reasonable price-to-FCF (~15.1) and the market appears to be valuing the company against that FCF despite recent accounting losses. High trailing dividend yield (6.47%, 97th percentile) and inclusion in large ETFs provide structural demand and income orientation, while a material long-term holder (Berkshire) and an open-market CEO purchase signal insider and cornerstone investor alignment. Technical market signals (golden cross, positive six‑month momentum) and cash on the balance sheet with modest repurchases indicate liquidity and multiple channels of investor support that can coexist with headline accounting losses. The bear points (large operating loss, negative EBITDA, sharp institutional 13F decline) are factually present but have weaknesses in evidence strength or context when weighed against persistent FCF, ownership structure, and market/technical signals.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.37
33 surviving claims rest on 13 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 21% of them, and 97% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The read is drawn from a relatively small set of distinct sources with one analyst carrying a material share of the surviving claims, so individual-source bias could move the balance of evidence. The very high debate survival rate means few claims were overturned during review, which increases confidence in the documented observations but also suggests limited internal challenge — treat the package as informative but moderately fragile to new or corrective source evidence.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 2nd of 6 in Packaged Foods (as of 2026-09-16).
90-day volatility ranks 5th of 6 in Packaged Foods (as of 2026-09-16).
dividend yield ranks 4th of 6 in Packaged Foods (as of 2026-09-16).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment. When the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here (no outside knowledge, no browsing), and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
10 filings· 3 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data, not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer−1.0 to the score
8 documents· 4 cited
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes−0.8 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash+0.2 to the score
2 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.2 to the score
11 filings· 2 cited
Insider filings
Parsed Forms 3/4/5 from EDGAR: named insiders, share counts, prices, and 10b5-1 plan state, with stated and inferred flags kept apart.
Read by Talbot−0.4 to the score
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only; it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal; the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
The full terminal on KHC Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Get this for the names you actually hold
Every name in your portfolio, researched the same way, plus the one thing no sample can show: how each one sits inside what you already own.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.