L
LOEWS CORPEvidence as of 2026-09-03Overview · LOEWS CORP
Loews Corporation provides commercial property and casualty insurance in the United States and internationally. The company offers specialty insurance products, such as management and professional liability, and other coverage products; surety and fidelity bonds; property insurance products that include property, marine and boiler, and machinery coverages; and casualty insurance products, such as workers' compensatio…
Management team
- Mr. Benjamin J. Tisch · Senior VP of Corporate Development & StrategyFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Kenneth I. Siegel · Senior Vice PresidentFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Richard Waldo Scott · Senior VP & Chief Investment OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Jane J. Wang · Senior VP & CFOFind on LinkedIn
Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.5 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The evidence balance is constructive (+0.5 of a possible +2) with high confidence. Reported revenues were steady-to-up across the recent fiscal quarters: revenue of 4,494,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2025 (2025-01-01 to 2025-03-31, 3mo), 4,555,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2025 (2025-04-01 to 2025-06-30, 3mo), 4,671,000,000 in fiscal Q3 2025 (2025-07-01 to 2025-09-30, 3mo), then 4,555,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) and 4,734,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-31, 3mo). Net income and diluted EPS show similar quarter-to-quarter variability with net income of 370,000,000 to 504,000,000 across the series and EPS ranging from 1.63 USD/shares to 2.43 USD/shares over the same intervals.
Shares outstanding declined from 212,861,300 as of 2025-02-07 to 204,427,720 as of 2026-07-31. Balance-sheet totals rose: assets moved from 81,943,000,000, liabilities from 64,006,000,000 and stockholders' equity from 17,066,000,000 as of 2024-12-31 to assets of 87,228,000,000, liabilities of 67,196,000,000 and stockholders' equity of 19,115,000,000 as of 2026-06-30. Valuation inputs show market capitalization of 22,270,355,817, enterprise value of 31,195,355,817, P/E (TTM) of 13.47 with EPS (TTM) of 8.09, price-to-FCF (TTM) of 20.27, FCF (TTM) of 1,105,000,000 and an implied FCF growth rate of 0.0932 (9.32%).
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Reported revenues for consecutive fiscal quarters: 4,494,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2025 (2025-01-01 to 2025-03-31, 3mo) and 4,555,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2025 (2025-04-01 to 2025-06-30, 3mo), 4,671,000,000 in fiscal Q3 2025 (2025-07-01 to 2025-09-30, 3mo), 4,555,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) and 4,734,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000060086-25-000091Net income (loss) by quarter: 370,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2025 (2025-01-01 to 2025-03-31, 3mo), 391,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2025 (2025-04-01 to 2025-06-30, 3mo), 504,000,000 in fiscal Q3 2025 (2025-07-01 to 2025-09-30, 3mo), 337,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) and 444,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000060086-25-000091Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
No computed signal history for this symbol yet — signals need roughly 70 trading days of price history.
Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00 the IVV ETF held the company at 0.03% weight of the fund.
ETF constituents · market dataThe provided evidence contains a single ETF membership record (IVV) for the company as of the timestamp above; no other ETF memberships or Form 4 insider filing events are present in the supplied evidence.
ETF constituents · market dataReads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Royal London Asset Management Ltd. reduced its Loews Corporation stake by 8.4%, selling 9,854 shares in the second quarter.
News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-09-01BTG Pactual Asset Management US LLC purchased 5,050 shares of Loews Corporation in the second quarter, a position valued at approximately $572,000.
News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-09-01Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate that today's price would justify is 9.32% (implied_growth = 0.0932) as of the price date 2026-09-02.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closePrice-to-FCF (TTM) is 20.27 and FCF (TTM) is $1,105,000,000 as of the valuation inputs.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Sequential quarterly revenues, rising net income and EPS over the reported quarters, a notable reduction in shares outstanding, and a larger reported equity base together form a coherently positive data cluster. Those items (consistent top-line scale, improving per-share profits, and fewer shares outstanding) strengthen the signal that reported earnings power per share has increased; valuation metrics (P/E 13.47, P/FCF 20.27, implied FCF growth 9.32) show the market-priced expectations embedded in current price are not extreme relative to the observed earnings and cash flow levels. Institutional filing evidence includes multiple new or larger buys (including a large 787,900-share buy) which supports demand from some active managers and rebuts the notion that recent activity is solely selling; the single small stake reduction cited is isolated versus multiple buys. Evidence strength: fundamentals (revenue, net income, EPS) — strong; share-count decline — strong; balance-sheet improvement — moderate; valuation metrics — moderate; institutional buys — moderate; isolated institutional sell — weak; ETF weight / market-noise headlines — weak.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.30
20 surviving claims rest on 12 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 35% of them, and 100% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The evidence base is moderately broad (dozens of claims from a dozen sources) but leans on a few contributors — one analyst/author accounts for over a third of surviving claims — and every point the desk raised remained unchallenged in debate. That combination raises some fragility: the set is informative about reported historical figures and model inputs, but concentrated authorship and complete survival through internal review mean the read should carry caution against groupthink or untested assumptions.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
15 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+1.0 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on L Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.