MPWR
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INCEvidence as of 2026-09-03Overview · MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. engages in the design, development, marketing, and sale of semiconductor-based power electronics solutions for the computing and storage, automotive, industrial, communications, and consumer markets. The company provides direct current (DC) to DC integrated circuits (ICs) that are used to convert and control voltages of various electronic systems, such as portable electronic devices, wi…
Management team
- Mr. Deming Xiao · Executive Vice President of Asia OperationsFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Maurice Sciammas · Executive Vice President of Worldwide Sales & MarketingFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Saria Tseng · EVP of Strategic Corporate Development, General Counsel & Corporate SecretaryFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Theodore Bernie Blegen · Executive VP & CFOFind on LinkedIn
Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.2 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
Mixed (+0.2 of a possible +2; confidence high). Revenue trended higher across the four reported comparable quarters: 664,574,000 USD in the three months ended 30 June 2025 (Q2 2025 — fiscal quarter ended 2025-07-28), 737,176,000 USD in the three months ended 30 September 2025 (Q3 2025 — fiscal quarter ended 2025-10-29), 804,185,000 USD in the three months ended 31 March 2026 (Q1 2026 — fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-27), and 980,642,000 USD in the three months ended 30 June 2026 (Q2 2026 — fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-29).
Gross margin held near 55% each quarter and operating income, net income, and diluted EPS each increased across the same cadence (operating income rose from 164,758,000 USD to 303,894,000 USD; net income from 135,009,000 USD to 257,298,000 USD; diluted EPS from 2.81 USD/sh to 5.22 USD/sh). Balance-sheet and market metrics are mixed: cash and cash equivalents declined from 1,062,930,000 USD as of 31 March 2026 to 1,005,587,000 USD as of 30 June 2026 while total stockholders’ equity rose to 3,895,424,000 USD as of 30 June 2026. Valuation ratios implied by the current price are rich on several measures: price-to-FCF (TTM) 71.72, EV/EBITDA (TTM) 62.03, P/E (TTM) 77.72, with FCF (TTM) 837,462,000 USD and market capitalization 59,923,008,480 USD.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue has increased across the included quarters: 664,574,000 USD in the three months ended 30 June 2025; 737,176,000 USD in the three months ended 30 September 2025; 804,185,000 USD in the three months ended 31 March 2026; and 980,642,000 USD in the three months ended 30 June 2026.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001628280-26-053275Gross margin (gross profit / revenue) is approximately stable around 55% across comparable quarters: 366,016,000 / 664,574,000 = ~55.1% for the three months ended 30 June 2025; 406,228,000 / 737,176,000 = ~55.1% for the three months ended 30 September 2025; 445,065,000 / 804,185,000 = ~55.4% for the three months ended 31 March 2026; and 541,070,000 / 980,642,000 = ~55.2% for the three months ended 30 June 2026.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001628280-26-053275Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
No computed signal history for this symbol yet — signals need roughly 70 trading days of price history.
Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00, the ETF with symbol IVV held 0.11% weight of the fund in MPWR.
ETF constituents · market dataThe provided ownership evidence contains a single ETF membership record (IVV) and no other institutional or insider ownership entries.
ETF constituents · market dataReads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Coverage in simplywall.st highlights recent company-reported momentum in power management solutions tied to AI infrastructure, noting a growing pipeline of AI server, optical module, and data center design wins.
News · simplywall.st · 2026-09-02weakened in debateAn industry-outlook piece syndicated to finance.yahoo.com and originally from Zacks frames Monolithic Power alongside peers as beneficiaries of AI demand and a semiconductor recovery in coverage published 2 September 2026.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-02weakened in debateReads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate that today's price would justify, under the stated discount and terminal assumptions, is 43.55% (0.4355).
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closePrice-to-FCF (TTM) is 71.72.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
The provided evidence shows a clear operating and profitability expansion over the reported quarters: sequential revenue growth (fundamentals-0) accompanied by stable ~55% gross margins (fundamentals-1) while operating income, net income, and diluted EPS each rose materially (fundamentals-2, fundamentals-3, fundamentals-4). Total stockholders' equity also expanded over the year (fundamentals-7), and trailing free cash flow is sizable in absolute terms (valuation-4), which together underpin a fundamental read of improving business performance and strong cash-generation capacity. The valuation and market-noise items (valuation-* and news-3/news-4) are contestable when contextualized against rapid revenue and EPS gains and a large FCF base; the cash decline reported for one quarter (fundamentals-6) is small relative to the company’s overall liquidity and enterprise value. Positive industry commentary and company-specific AI/data-center design-win coverage (news-0, news-1) further support a favorable operational narrative rather than attributing recent moves only to market-wide factors.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.45
19 surviving claims rest on 8 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 42% of them, and 85% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The read rests on a moderate breadth of sources but a meaningful concentration of analyst influence; with 42% of surviving claims coming from the single heaviest analyst and only eight distinct sources, a few inputs could materially change the summary. The high debate survival rate (85%) shows internal consensus on these claims, but the desk should weight them cautiously given the source concentration and the small number of independently corroborating items.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
11 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.4 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on MPWR Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.