PEG
Public Service Enterprise Group IncorporatedEvidence as of 2026-09-03Overview · Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated, through its subsidiaries, operates as an energy company primarily in Mid-Atlantic United States. The company operates through PSE&G and PSEG Power. The PSE&G segment transmits electricity; distributes electricity and gas to residential, commercial, and industrial customers, as well as invests in solar generation projects, and energy efficiency and related programs; and of…
Management team
- Ms. Rose M. Chernick · Controller & VPFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Grace H. Park · Executive VP & General CounselFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Kim C. Hanemann · President & COO of Public Service Electric & GasFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Daniel J. Cregg · Executive VP & CFOFind on LinkedIn
Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.1 on a −2 to +2 scale — was +0.0 before the debate changed the read.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The desk’s evidence balance is Mixed (+ 0.1 of a possible + 2; was + 0.0 before debate) with confidence high. Revenue fell from $ 3,848,000,000 in Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-21) to $ 2,554,000,000 in Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-20). Operating income declined from $ 1,075,000,000 to $ 461,000,000 and net income from $ 741,000,000 to $ 334,000,000 over the same two quarters.
Balance-sheet and market facts in the packet show cash and cash equivalents at $ 192,000,000 as of 2026-06-30 and long-term debt at $ 23,591,000,000 (up from $ 21,114,000,000 as of 2024-12-31), implying net debt of $ 23,399,000,000 and an enterprise value of $ 59,943,156,600. Market-read metrics are low-volatility and low-beta (beta 0.11, vol_90d_annualized + 17.9%), modestly below moving averages (price_vs_sma50 - 5.5%, price_vs_sma200 - 7.5%), and show negative short- and longer-term momentum (momentum_3m - 4.9%, momentum_12_1 - 11.5%). Dividend yield and growth are present (div_yield_ttm + 3.55%, div_growth_3y + 5.4%).
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenues fell from $3,848,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) to $2,554,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001193125-26-206545Operating income declined from $1,075,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) to $461,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001193125-26-206545Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
PEG's beta vs SPY is 0.11, indicating very low market sensitivity on the as-of date.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02PEG's correlation vs SPY is 0.08, showing minimal return correlation with the S&P 500 on the as-of date.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 2026-09-02, the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) included PEG at a weight of 0.06% of the fund.
ETF constituents · market dataThe 0.06% weight indicates PEG is a small position within IVV's overall portfolio as of 2026-09-02.
ETF constituents · market dataReads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Van ECK Associates Corp increased its stake in Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated by 5.6% in the second quarter, owning 3,901,675 shares, per a 13F filing.
News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-08-29Equitable Holdings Inc. established a new position in Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated in the second quarter, buying 50,804 shares valued at about $4,123,000.
News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-08-28Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The model shows an implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate of 7.33% that today's price would justify under the stated discount and terminal assumptions.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closePrice-to-free-cash-flow (price/FCF) on trailing twelve months FCF is 18.66.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
While recent quarter-to-quarter revenue, operating income, and net income declines are factual, several pieces of evidence support a favorable read on the company’s current profile. Valuation metrics (P/E ~16, EV/EBITDA ~13.8, price/FCF ~18.7) and an implied FCF growth rate of 7.33% indicate the current price embeds reasonable cash-flow expectations relative to reported results. Low market sensitivity (beta ~0.11, correlation ~0.08), below-average volatility, and a 3.55% dividend yield with 3-year dividend growth provide an income-oriented, lower-volatility exposure within the utility space. Stability in share count limits dilution, ETF inclusion and recent institutional net buys show ongoing investor participation, and the GridSmart Battery program points to revenue diversification and customer-facing initiatives that could influence future cash flows. These items jointly counterbalance short-term earnings variability and high nominal net debt when viewed through valuation and income-supporting lenses.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.36
28 surviving claims rest on 13 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 29% of them, and 96% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
Most surviving claims are anchored in primary filings (10-Q/10-K) and systematic signals, which gives the read substantive footing; however the evidence base is not highly diverse — a single analyst accounts for a substantial share of carried claims and the desk preserved almost all raised points, so there was little debiasing attrition. Taken together, these patterns imply a reasonably robust snapshot of recent results and signals, but limited source diversity and analyst concentration reduce how much weight to place on marginal or speculative inferences drawn from the set.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 12th of 12 in Utilities—Regulated Electric (as of 2026-09-02).
6-month relative strength ranks 11th of 12 in Utilities—Regulated Electric (as of 2026-09-02).
90-day volatility ranks 11th of 12 in Utilities—Regulated Electric (as of 2026-09-02).
dividend yield ranks 5th of 12 in Utilities—Regulated Electric (as of 2026-09-02).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
15 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer−0.7 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash+0.4 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.5 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on PEG Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.