PSKY
New Pluto Global Inc - Class BEvidence as of 2026-09-03Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
−0.2 on a −2 to +2 scale — was −0.3 before the debate changed the read.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The evidence balance is Mixed ( -0.2 of a possible +2; was -0.3 before debate) · confidence high. On fundamentals, revenue fell from $ 7,342,000,000 in fiscal quarter ended 2026-03-31 to $ 6,913,000,000 in fiscal quarter ended 2026-06-30, operating income declined from $ 616,000,000 to $ 475,000,000, and net income dropped from $ 168,000,000 to $ 41,000,000 over the same intervals. Diluted EPS fell from $ 0.15 to $ 0.04 while diluted shares outstanding edged up from 1,118,000,000 to 1,120,000,000; cash and cash equivalents declined from $ 1,941,000,000 as of 2026-03-31 to $ 1,627,000,000 as of 2026-06-30.
On market and valuation metrics, the stock shows lower systematic sensitivity to the S&P 500 (beta 0.77, correlation 0.18), a price of $ 10.97 and market cap of $ 11,756,186,738, trailing twelve-month P/E of 22.39, trailing twelve-month EBITDA of $ 2,941,000,000 producing EV/EBITDA of 3.44 and an enterprise value of $ 10,129,186,738. Longer-term price weakness is evident in 12‑month relative strength vs SPY of -43.4% and a 3‑year max drawdown of -59.9%; recent volatility is above the universe median (90‑day annualized +39.1%) while volatility vs the stock’s own history is low. News coverage centers on the proposed Paramount Skydance — Warner Bros. Discovery merger, including a reported UK CMA clearance dated 6 August 2026 and state-level settlement and bond headlines, and consensus coverage shows an average analyst rating described as “Reduce.”
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue fell from $7,342,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31) to $6,913,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30).
XBRL companyfacts · 0002041610-26-000026Operating income decreased from $616,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31) to $475,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30).
XBRL companyfacts · 0002041610-26-000026Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
Beta vs SPY is 0.77 and correlation vs SPY is 0.18, indicating lower systematic sensitivity to the S&P 500 and weak contemporaneous movement with SPY as of 2026-09-02.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02Short-term momentum is mixed: momentum over 3 months is +5.5%, over 6 months is -8.0%, and relative strength vs SPY over 6 months is -20.0%; the 6-month momentum ranks in the 22th percentile of the 547-stock research universe as of 2026-09-02.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02weakened in debateReads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 2026-09-02, the reported weight of PSKY in the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) was 0.0% of the fund.
ETF constituents · market dataThe provided ownership evidence includes a single ETF-membership data point dated 2026-09-02 and does not show PSKY's membership or weights in other ETFs or index funds.
ETF constituents · market dataReads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
A headline reports that the United Kingdom Competition and Markets Authority formally cleared Paramount Skydance Corporation’s pending acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, noting the CMA action dated 6 August 2026.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-08-28Headlines state Paramount Skydance said it is seeking a settlement with 12 states that are trying to block its $110 billion merger with Warner Bros. Discovery and separately requested a roughly $1.9 billion bond from those states.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-08-28Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No SEC identity on file for this symbol — insider filings cannot be looked up.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The reported price per share on 2026-09-02 is $10.97 and the market capitalization is $11,756,186,738.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeTrailing twelve-month P/E is 22.39 and trailing twelve-month EBITDA is $2,941,000,000, producing an EV/EBITDA of 3.44 and an enterprise value of $10,129,186,738.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Several pieces of supplied evidence jointly support a favorable read: the company shows attractive valuation multiples (EV/EBITDA 3.44, trailing P/E 22.39 and TTM EBITDA of $2.94B) and reported trailing operating income and D&A that underpin those multiples. Market-positioning signals — low beta (0.77) and very low correlation with the S&P 500 — indicate lower systematic sensitivity, while price strength vs the 50-day SMA (+15.4%) and a non-trivial dividend yield (1.82%) are consistent with improving near-term technical posture. The regulatory development (CMA clearance) and cross-outlet coverage add evidence that a major merger issue has progressed, and balance-sheet snapshots show stable total assets and a modest increase in stockholders’ equity despite quarter-to-quarter fluctuations in cash. Taken together, these claims form a coherent bull case around valuation, corporate-financial scale, defensive market characteristics, and deal-related positive news.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.42
26 surviving claims rest on 9 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 31% of them, and 98% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The read rests on a moderate number of distinct sources but a substantial share of surviving claims trace back to a small set of inputs and a single analyst carries nearly a third of the claims; that concentration increases the chance that a single correction or omitted document would meaningfully change the picture. The very high survival rate from the desk debate means few claims were knocked down internally, so treat the collection as a coherent narrative but one that is somewhat fragile to new filings or alternate primary-source disclosures.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
6 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer−0.6 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash−0.1 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on PSKY Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.