PWR
QUANTA SERVICES, INC.Evidence as of 2026-09-03Overview · QUANTA SERVICES, INC.
Quanta Services, Inc. provides infrastructure solutions for the electric and gas utility, renewable energy, communications, and pipeline and energy industries worldwide. The company's Electric Power Infrastructure Solutions segment engages in the design, procurement, construction, upgrade, repair, and maintenance of electric power transmission and distribution infrastructure and substation facilities; installation, m…
Management team
- Mr. Scot Fluharty · President of Underground Utilities & IndustrialFind on LinkedIn
- Gerald A. Ducey Jr. · Pres. of Strategic OperationFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Kimberly A. Riddle · Vice President of Human ResourcesFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Carolyn M. Campbell · Corporate SecretaryFind on LinkedIn
Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.8 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
What the evidence shows
The desk’s constructive view (+0.8 of a possible +2; confidence high) rests on a clear sequence of rising top‑line and profit metrics across the reported quarters. Revenue grew from $ 6,233,334,000 in the quarter ended 31 March 2025 (Q1 2025) to $ 9,556,997,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-27 (Q2 2026), while gross profit rose from $ 834,037,000 to $ 1,545,178,000 over the same span. Operating income and net income show the same upward pattern into Q2 2026, moving to $ 694,834,000 and $ 451,381,000 respectively, and diluted EPS reached $ 2.96 in Q2 2026. Trailing metrics record FCF of $ 394,993,000 (FCF per share $ 2.5912), a trailing P/E of 74.76 and P/FCF of 235.72, and the company carried a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.11 per share (annualized $ 0.44) announced for payment October 9, 2026.
What the debate changed
Analysts argued over leverage in the valuation model; that exchange weakened one valuation claim because the long‑term debt line used in the packet is dated 2019-09-30 while the cash figure is current at $ 506,431,000 as of 2026-06-30. The desk retained the constructive balance, however, because 97% of raised claims survived the session and no core revenue or profit figures were dropped. The contention narrowed the read by flagging the dated debt disclosure as a material caveat to enterprise value interpretation but did not change the fundamental revenue and profit sequence.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue increased from $6,233,334,000 in the quarter ended 31 March 2025 to $6,773,007,000 in the quarter ended 30 June 2025, $7,631,408,000 in the quarter ended 30 September 2025, $7,877,487,000 in the quarter ended 31 March 2026, and $9,556,997,000 in the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001050915-25-000047Gross profit rose across the same sequence of quarters: $834,037,000 (quarter ended 31 March 2025), $1,007,574,000 (30 June 2025), $1,216,434,000 (30 September 2025), $1,107,329,000 (31 March 2026), and $1,545,178,000 (30 June 2026).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001050915-25-000047Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
No computed signal history for this symbol yet — signals need roughly 70 trading days of price history.
Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 2026-09-02, PWR had a weight of 0.17% in the IVV ETF.
ETF constituents · market dataMembership in IVV indicates that, as of 2026-09-02, PWR was included as a constituent in a major index ETF, providing passive investor exposure to the company at the reported weight.
ETF constituents · market dataReads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
A quarterly cash dividend of $0.11 per share (annualized $0.44) was announced, payable October 9, 2026, to stockholders of record on the stated record date.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-02The dividend announcement was also distributed via a PR Newswire release on the same date.
News · prnewswire.com · 2026-09-02Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The valuation model reports an implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate of 83.83% that today's price would justify under the stated discount and terminal assumptions.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closePrice-to-free-cash-flow (P/FCF) on a trailing twelve-month basis is 235.72.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Company filings show a clear sequence of quarter-over-quarter revenue, gross profit, operating income, and net income increases across the reported period, with diluted EPS rising notably to $2.96 in the most recent quarter; these are strong, source-documented operating signals. Independent coverage and PR releases highlight near-doubling of net income, 41.1% revenue growth in fiscal Q2 2026, and margin expansion, while inclusion in a major index ETF (IVV) and a recurring cash dividend indicate broader investor access and a shareholder-return policy. The apparent valuation premium (very high implied FCF growth and P/FCF) rests against a meaningful trailing FCF ($394.993M) and a sizable cash balance; that suggests the market price is pricing aggressive future cash-flow expectations rather than reflecting weak recent operating performance. In sum, the documented operating improvements, third‑party coverage, and index membership jointly support a favorable reading of the company’s recent performance, while valuation metrics highlight the market’s growth assumptions rather than contradicting the reported fundamental strength.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.34
19 surviving claims rest on 10 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 32% of them, and 97% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The read rests on a modest breadth of sources but a small number of contributors supply a large share of surviving claims; that elevates analyst-dependence risk and means a single analyst error could shift interpretation materially. Also, because 97% of raised issues survived debate, the desk applied relatively little critical pushback — treat these claims as informative but somewhat fragile until corroborated by additional, independent sources or an updated filing.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
13 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.7 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+1.0 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on PWR Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.