REG
REGENCY CENTERS CORPEvidence as of 2026-10-09The desk's Snapshot
3 of 15 open to everyone · members see allRead the full desk report on REG
Seven analysts, the debate, the risk review, every claim cited. And the same for every name you hold.
Free plan, no credit card required. Silver opens the full report, $19.99 a month. AI-written · every claim cites a source · Insight, not advice.
Overview · REGENCY CENTERS CORP
Regency Centers is a preeminent national owner, operator, and developer of shopping centers located in suburban trade areas with compelling demographics. Our portfolio includes thriving properties merchandised with highly productive grocers, restaurants, service providers, and best-in-class retailers that connect to their neighborhoods, communities, and customers. Operating as a fully integrated real estate company,…
Management team
- Mr. Mike Kinsella · Senior VP of the Southeast Region & Senior Market OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Jan X. Hanak · Senior VP of Marketing & CommunicationsFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Nicholas Andrew Wibbenmeyer · Chief Investment Officer & President of West RegionFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Alan Todd Roth · COO & President of East RegionFind on LinkedIn
Start free to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it, not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.1 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled. The rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The evidence balance is Mixed (+0.1 of a possible +2; was +0.1 before debate) · confidence high. Reported revenues moved from $ 380,912,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 2025-04-30 (Q1 2025) to $ 380,848,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 2025-07-30 (Q2 2025), $ 387,570,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 2025-11-03 (Q3 2025), and $ 412,453,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-30 (Q1 2026). Operating income also displayed a rising pattern across those same periods, from $ 273,538,000 to $ 296,394,000, and net income for the three-months reported rose to $ 128,549,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-30 after earlier quarter movements.
Balance-sheet and market details survive the desk review: long-term debt increased to $ 5,003,934,000 as of 2026-03-31; total assets rose to about $ 13,046,484,000 as of 2026-03-31; common shares outstanding ticked up to 183,096,790 as of 2026-04-30. Market signals show very low sensitivity to the market (beta 0.05), dividend yield of 4.23% (trailing twelve months), subdued recent volatility (90-day vol +15.6%, near the 1st percentile versus its own history), and negative short- to medium-term momentum (three-month -10.2%, six-month -7.9%).
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else (no outside knowledge, no browsing), so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC (revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter) and reports which way the trend is running.
Reported revenues increased across the sample quarters from $380,912,000 in the fiscal Q1 2025 (2025-01-01 to 2025-03-31, 3mo) to $380,848,000 in the fiscal Q2 2025 (2025-04-01 to 2025-06-30, 3mo), $387,570,000 in the fiscal Q3 2025 (2025-07-01 to 2025-09-30, 3mo), and $412,453,000 in the fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000950170-25-062596weakened in debateOperating income showed a rising pattern over the same quarters: $273,538,000 in the fiscal Q1 2025 (2025-01-01 to 2025-03-31, 3mo), $280,933,000 in the fiscal Q2 2025 (2025-04-01 to 2025-06-30, 3mo), $281,868,000 in the fiscal Q3 2025 (2025-07-01 to 2025-09-30, 3mo), and $296,394,000 in the fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000950170-25-062596Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full: its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet; its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
A Form 10-Q for the quarter was filed on 2026-08-03 (the filing present in the evidence is the 10-Q filed 3 August 2026).
10-Q filed 2026-08-03Multiple current reports (Form 8-K) were filed in the July–September 2026 timeframe: on 2026-07-29, 2026-08-06, 2026-08-11, and 2026-09-11 (accessions the 8-K filed 29 July 2026, the 8-K filed 6 August 2026, the 8-K filed 11 August 2026, and the 8-K filed 11 September 2026 respectively).
8-K filed 2026-07-29Reads the signal panel above (momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta) and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
Beta vs SPY is 0.05 and correlation vs SPY is 0.05 as of 2026-10-08, indicating very low historical market sensitivity in the sample period.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-10-08Three-month momentum is -10.2% and six-month momentum is -7.9% as of 2026-10-08, with the six-month momentum ranking in the 27th percentile of the 881-stock research universe.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-10-08Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
Institutional 13F-reported holdings total "$13.88B" as of 2026-06-30, with 612 holders reported and top holders including BlackRock ($1.60B), NORGES BANK ($1.37B), and Vanguard Portfolio Management LLC ($1.19B).
13F holdings · 612 filers · as of 2026-06-30The 13F dataset notes a 45-day reporting lag (13F filings carry a 45-day reporting lag) so the holdings are the latest reported quarter, not a same-day book.
13F holdings · 612 filers · as of 2026-06-30Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Multiple headlines preview Regency Centers' upcoming third-quarter earnings and note analysts expect single-digit year-over-year EPS growth for that report.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-10-08The company issued notices inviting the public to its third-quarter 2026 earnings conference call and stated the earnings release will follow the call schedule.
News · globenewswire.com · 2026-09-30Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5: who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
Terah L. Devereaux, Principal Accounting Officer, reported a sale of 1,240 shares valued at "$99k" on 12 June 2026 (filed on Form 4).
Form 4 · Devereaux Terah L (Principal Accounting Officer) · $99k sold · 2026-06-12Multiple directors received or acquired shares on 11 May 2026 with transaction code "M" and reported value "$0" (example filing for James H. Simmons III shows 1,736 shares, code M, value "$0").
Form 4 · Simmons James H. III (Director) · $0 code M · 2026-05-11Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
Trailing twelve-month price-to-earnings (P/E) is 48.96.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeEnterprise-value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) on a trailing twelve-month basis is 11.91, with trailing twelve-month EBITDA of 1,516,221,000.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score. The argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Several company-specific operating metrics point to improving fundamentals: reported revenue, operating income, and quarterly net income each trend upward across the sample quarters (fundamentals-0, fundamentals-1, fundamentals-2). Those operating gains sit alongside a sizable trailing twelve‑month EBITDA that produces a mid‑teens EV/EBITDA multiple (valuation-1), which is a complementary enterprise‑value lens to the elevated trailing P/E (valuation-0). Ownership data shows rising institutional reported value and increasing holder count plus broad ETF inclusion and large passive holders, which indicate measurable institutional exposure to the company (ownership-0, ownership-2, ownership-3). Market signals also show unusually low recent volatility and a relatively high trailing dividend yield, which together suggest an income profile with lower short‑term price variability than peers (market-2, market-3).
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
diversified0.27
35 surviving claims rest on 20 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 17% of them, and 97% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The surviving set is moderately broad but not robust: 35 claims draw on 20 sources, so the read is supported by multiple documents but not a large independent base. One analyst accounts for a noticeable share of claims and the desk’s very high claim survival rate suggests internal debate preserved most points — together these facts mean treat the read as informative but somewhat fragile to new, independent evidence.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 8th of 10 in REIT—Retail (as of 2026-10-08).
90-day volatility ranks 9th of 10 in REIT—Retail (as of 2026-10-08).
dividend yield ranks 8th of 10 in REIT—Retail (as of 2026-10-08).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment. When the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here (no outside knowledge, no browsing), and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
13 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data, not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.0 to the score
10 documents· 2 cited
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes+0.0 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash+0.2 to the score
3 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.6 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
14 filings· 2 cited
Insider filings
Parsed Forms 3/4/5 from EDGAR: named insiders, share counts, prices, and 10b5-1 plan state, with stated and inferred flags kept apart.
Read by Talbot−0.5 to the score
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only; it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal; the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
The full terminal on REG Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Get this for the names you actually hold
Every name in your portfolio, researched the same way, plus the one thing no sample can show: how each one sits inside what you already own.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.