REG
REGENCY CENTERS CORPEvidence as of 2026-09-02Overview · REGENCY CENTERS CORP
Regency Centers is a preeminent national owner, operator, and developer of shopping centers located in suburban trade areas with compelling demographics. Our portfolio includes thriving properties merchandised with highly productive grocers, restaurants, service providers, and best-in-class retailers that connect to their neighborhoods, communities, and customers. Operating as a fully integrated real estate company,…
Management team
- Mr. Mike Kinsella · Senior VP of the Southeast Region & Senior Market OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Jan X. Hanak · Senior VP of Marketing & CommunicationsFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Nicholas Andrew Wibbenmeyer · Chief Investment Officer & President of West RegionFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Alan Todd Roth · COO & President of East RegionFind on LinkedIn
Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.2 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The evidence balance is Mixed (+0.2 of a possible +2; was +0.2 before debate) · confidence high. Revenues in fiscal Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-30) were $412,453,000, up from $380,912,000 in fiscal Q1 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-04-30) and $363,852,000 in fiscal Q1 2024 (fiscal quarter ended 2024-05-01). Operating income rose to $296,394,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 from $273,538,000 in fiscal Q1 2025, and net income increased to $128,549,000 from $109,587,000 over the same comparison.
At the same time, net cash provided by operating activities for the fiscal Q1s has declined from $167,758,000 in fiscal Q1 2024 to $152,729,000 in fiscal Q1 2026, and long-term debt increased from $4,408,700,000 as of 2024-12-31 to $5,003,934,000 as of 2026-03-31. Market and ownership signals show low market sensitivity (beta 0.06, correlation 0.05 on 2026-09-01), a 3.90% TTM dividend yield, low recent volatility, a golden-cross on 2026-09-01, and institutional 13F holdings of $11.98B as of the period ended 2026-03-31.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenues for the fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) were $412,453,000, up from $380,912,000 in the fiscal Q1 2025 (2025-01-01 to 2025-03-31, 3mo) and $363,852,000 in the fiscal Q1 2024 (2024-01-01 to 2024-03-31, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001193125-26-203537Operating income increased from $273,538,000 in the fiscal Q1 2025 (2025-01-01 to 2025-03-31, 3mo) to $296,394,000 in the fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo); net income rose from $109,587,000 in fiscal Q1 2025 to $128,549,000 in fiscal Q1 2026.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001193125-26-203537Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
REGENCY CENTERS CORP filed a Form 10-Q for the quarter ended (filed) 3 August 2026 (the 10-Q filed 3 August 2026).
10-Q filed 2026-08-03REGENCY CENTERS CORP filed current reports on Form 8-K on 29 July 2026, 6 August 2026, and 11 August 2026 (accessions the 8-K filed 29 July 2026, the 8-K filed 6 August 2026, and the 8-K filed 11 August 2026 respectively).
8-K filed 2026-07-29Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
Beta vs SPY is 0.06 and correlation vs SPY is 0.05, indicating very low market sensitivity on 2026-09-01.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-01Dividend yield (TTM) is +3.90% and 3-year dividend growth is +4.9%, with dividend yield ranked at the 88th percentile of the 547-stock research universe on 2026-09-01.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-01Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
Institutional 13F-reported holdings totaled $11.98B as of the reporting period ended 2026-03-31 (13F filings carry a 45-day reporting lag).
13F holdings · 582 filers · as of 2026-03-31Top institutional holders reported include BlackRock, Inc. at $1.57B, VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC at $1.13B, STATE STREET CORP at $936.9M, VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC at $854.3M, and JPMORGAN CHASE & CO at $770.1M in the 13F for the period ended 2026-03-31.
13F holdings · 582 filers · as of 2026-03-31Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
A Simply Wall St piece published 30 August 2026 presents a valuation view (DCF and multiples) that suggests Regency Centers may trade below an estimate of intrinsic value and notes a 36.6% total return over the past three years.
News · simplywall.st · 2026-08-30An article dated 29 August 2026 reports a consensus analyst target price and a 'Moderate Buy' consensus from nineteen brokerages for Regency Centers.
News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-08-29Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
Aggregate insider activity in the provided data shows $35.3M of reported insider sales and $0 of reported insider purchases over the 180-day window (net shares -451,272).
Form 4 · Devereaux Terah L (Principal Accounting Officer) · $99k sold · 2026-06-12Terah L. Devereaux (Principal Accounting Officer) reported an open sale of 1,240 shares for $99k on 12 June 2026 (filing shows the sale and an additional 620-share code G record in the same filing).
Form 4 · Devereaux Terah L (Principal Accounting Officer) · $99k sold · 2026-06-12Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The reported market price used in this observation is 76.06 with a price_date of 2026-09-01.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeMarket capitalization is reported as 13,926,341,847 and enterprise value is reported as 18,893,420,847, implying a material net debt load embedded in enterprise value.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
The evidence set shows sequential top-line and profit improvements in recent fiscal Q1 results alongside rising operating and net income, while market signals show low beta, low realized volatility, a solid 3.9% TTM dividend yield with multi-year dividend growth, and a bullish technical configuration (golden cross). Large institutional ownership and multiple analyst buy/Moderate Buy signals add a layer of investor confidence, and recent news items note valuation views and fresh institutional purchases. Against the bear points, the company still reports positive operating cash flow on a trailing basis and recent director-level acquisitions are present amid some insider sales, while the rise in long-term debt coincides with larger scale (market cap ~13.9B) that institutional holders continue to support. Financial advisors often suggest that stable cash generation, institutional backing, yield profile, and low realized volatility are factors that market participants view favorably when assessing a business profile.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
diversified0.24
37 surviving claims rest on 23 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 16% of them, and 99% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The research rests on a moderate breadth of sources (23) for 37 surviving claims, and no single analyst dominates the evidence set—so the read is not overly concentrated in one reporter. However, the very high internal survivorship (99% of raised items survived debate) suggests the desk reached strong internal consensus; that reduces internal disagreement but can also reflect limited adversarial testing. Treat the overall read as informational but give less weight to any single fragile input (e.g., isolated filings or single-outlet news) when integrating with other research.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
26 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.0 to the score
8 documents· 2 cited
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes+0.0 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash+0.7 to the score
3 holdings records· 1 cited
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.8 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
14 filings· 1 cited
Insider filings
Parsed Forms 3/4/5 from EDGAR: named insiders, share counts, prices, and 10b5-1 plan state — stated and inferred flags kept apart.
Read by Talbot−0.3 to the score
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on REG Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.