TAP
MOLSON COORS BEVERAGE COEvidence as of 2026-09-03Overview · MOLSON COORS BEVERAGE CO
Molson Coors Beverage Company manufactures, markets, and sells beer and other malt beverage products under various brands in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. The company offers flavored malt beverages including hard seltzers, craft, and ready to drink beverages. It provides its products under Aspall Cider, Blue Moon, Coors Original, Hop Valley brands, Leinenkugel's, Miller Genuine…
Management team
- Ms. Natalie Maciolek · Chief Legal & Government Affairs Officer and SecretaryFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Dave Osswald · Chief People & Diversity OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Adam Collins · Chief Communications & Corporate Affairs OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Greg Tierney · Vice President of FP&A and Investor RelationsFind on LinkedIn
Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
−0.3 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The desk rates the evidence balance as Mixed ( -0.3 of a possible +2; was -0.3 before debate) · confidence high. Revenue by fiscal quarter is reported at $2,693,020,000 in FISCAL Q1 2025 (ended 2025-03-31), $3,740,000,000 in FISCAL Q2 2025 (ended 2025-06-30), $3,484,300,000 in Q3 2025 (ended 2025-09-30) and $3,604,400,000 in Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-06-30).
Gross profit and implied gross margin moved from $850,900,000 (≈ 31.6%) in Q1 2025 to $1,281,900,000 (≈ 34.3%) in Q2 2025, then $1,173,500,000 (≈ 33.7%) in Q3 2025 and $1,063,300,000 (≈ 29.5%) in Q2 2026. Operating and net results are lumpy across the sample: operating income of $186,300,000 and net income of $121,000,000 in Q1 2025; operating income $583,600,000 and net income $428,700,000 in Q2 2025; an operating loss of $3,431,100,000 and net loss of $2,927,600,000 in Q3 2025; and operating income $331,900,000 and net income $231,700,000 in Q2 2026.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue by fiscal quarter: $2,693,020,000 in fiscal Q1 2025 (2025-01-01 to 2025-03-31, 3mo); $3,740,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2025 (2025-04-01 to 2025-06-30, 3mo); $3,484,300,000 in fiscal Q3 2025 (2025-07-01 to 2025-09-30, 3mo); and $3,604,400,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000024545-25-000014Gross profit and implied gross margin: gross profit $850,900,000 in fiscal Q1 2025 (850,900,000 / revenue $2,693,020,000 ≈ 31.6%); $1,281,900,000 in fiscal Q2 2025 (1,281,900,000 / $3,740,000,000 ≈ 34.3%); $1,173,500,000 in fiscal Q3 2025 (1,173,500,000 / $3,484,300,000 ≈ 33.7%); and $1,063,300,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (1,063,300,000 / $3,604,400,000 ≈ 29.5%).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000024545-25-000014Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
Dividend yield (TTM) is +5.87% and its dividend yield ranks at the 96th percentile of the 547-stock research universe as of 2026-09-02.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02Three-year dividend growth is +14.6% as of 2026-09-02.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 2026-09-02, the ETF IVV had a 0.01% weight of TAP in its holdings.
ETF constituents · market dataThe data shows a very small passive index exposure to TAP via IVV (0.01% of the fund) as of 2026-09-02.
ETF constituents · market dataReads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Several outlets frame coverage around Molson CoorsBeverageCo's recent share-price weakness and valuation questions, explicitly noting a multi-week/month slide (one headline asks whether the stock is "Still Undervalued After A 28% Slide?").
News · simplywall.st · 2026-08-27Headline-level coverage includes short-term price-action and trading-model commentary focused on TAP's moves rather than company fundamentals (price-action only pieces set the tone for institutional models).
News · news.stocktradersdaily.com · 2026-08-29Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
Market price used in this evidence is $40.54 as of 2026-09-02.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeFree cash flow for the trailing twelve months (TTM) is negative $885,700,000.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
The evidence set contains several items that jointly support a favorable read: TAP shows material dividend yield and recent dividend growth (market-0, market-1), revenue that is broadly stable quarter-to-quarter in the sample (fundamentals-0), a falling diluted-share count consistent with repurchases (fundamentals-3), and recent quarters returning to operating income and net income after a single large loss quarter (fundamentals-2). Cash on the balance sheet has risen materially versus the 2024 year-end (fundamentals-5), and company-specific operational sustainability news is present (news-4), which can matter to income- and ESG-focused investors. These points suggest income-focused investors may view the company’s current profile more favorably than headline TTM losses or short-term price momentum indicate.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.40
30 surviving claims rest on 11 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 27% of them, and 98% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The surviving read is fairly information-rich but not without fragility: many claims rest on a compact set of primary filings and computed signals, and the largest single analyst contributes a sizeable share of claims. The very high debate-survival rate suggests few internal challenges altered the initial read — useful for coherence, but it raises the risk that correlated errors or unchallenged assumptions could carry through the whole set.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
11 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer−0.5 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash−0.3 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score
7 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on TAP Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.