TDY
Teledyne Technologies IncorporatedEvidence as of 2026-09-05The desk's Snapshot
3 of 15 open to everyone · members see allRead the full desk report on TDY
Seven analysts, the debate, the risk review, every claim cited. And the same for every name you hold.
Free plan, no credit card required. Silver opens the full report, $19.99 a month. AI-written · every claim cites a source · Insight, not advice.
Overview · Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated, together with its subsidiaries, provides enabling technologies for industrial growth markets in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, and internationally. The company's Instrumentation segment offers monitoring and control instruments for marine, environmental, industrial, and other applications, as well as electronic test and measurement equipment; and power and c…
Management team
- Mr. Carl W. Adams · VP & Chief Audit ExecutiveFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Melanie Susan Cibik · Executive VP, General Counsel, Secretary & Chief Compliance OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. George C. Bobb III · President & COOFind on LinkedIn
- Dr. Edwin Roks B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D. · Chief Executive OfficerFind on LinkedIn
Start free to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it, not a rating or a recommendation.
−0.5 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled. The rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The evidence balance is Cautious ( -0.5 of a possible +2; confidence high). Reported results show revenue of $ 1,662,500,000, up from $ 1,513,700,000 year‑over‑year; operating income rose to $ 333,200,000 from $ 278,200,000; and net income increased to $ 251,700,000 from $ 209,900,000 for the comparable prior quarter. Diluted EPS was $ 5.37 versus $ 4.43, weighted‑average diluted shares were 46,900,000 (reported shares outstanding 46,355,673 as of 15 July 2026), and reported long‑term debt fell to $ 2,027,000,000 with cash of $ 340,100,000 as of 28 June 2026.
Valuation snapshots in the packet compute trailing twelve‑month FCF of $ 882,600,000 (FCF per share $ 18.8188) and multiples: price/FCF ≈ 32.45, EV/EBITDA ≈ 19.78 with enterprise value $ 29,993,991,717, and P/E ≈ 31.64 on a price of $ 610.65. Filings and risk language were upheld, including added acquisition constraints, new obligations for U.S. defense contractors under the January 2026 executive order, and tightened government‑contracting cybersecurity and audit risks.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else (no outside knowledge, no browsing), so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC (revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter) and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue for the fiscal quarter ended 28 June 2026 (fiscal Q2 2026, 2026-03-30 to 2026-06-28) was $1,662,500,000, up from $1,513,700,000 in the comparable three-month period ended 29 June 2025.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001094285-26-000043Operating income rose to $333,200,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 28 June 2026 (fiscal Q2 2026, 2026-03-30 to 2026-06-28) from $278,200,000 in the comparable three-month period ended 29 June 2025.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001094285-26-000043Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full: its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet; its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
The 10-K filed 20 February 2026 adds a risk that inability to make acquisitions could adversely impact future growth and lists specific constraints on acquisition activity such as availability of candidates, competition, regulatory approvals and financing.
10-K filed 2026-02-20The 10-K filed 20 February 2026 adds a risk noting that the January 2026 presidential executive order imposes obligations on U.S. defense contractors, including prohibiting any 'major defense contractor' from conducting future stock buybacks or issuing dividends at the expense of accelerated procurement and increased production capacity.
10-K filed 2026-02-20Reads the signal panel above (momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta) and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
No computed signal history for this symbol yet — signals need roughly 70 trading days of price history.
Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00 the company is a holding in the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) with a weight of 0.05% of that fund.
ETF constituents · market dataThe reported 13F-positioned institutional total value is $7.0M as of the 2026-03-31 reporting period.
13F holdings · 1 filers · as of 2026-03-31Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
The headline reports Teledyne Qioptiq received a first option from the German Bundeswehr for PHOENIX-XR cooled thermal weapon sights valued at more than $21 million.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-04A headline asks whether a commercial aerospace recovery could boost Teledyne's growth, framing the story around the company benefiting from improving air travel and aircraft demand.
News · zacks.com · 2026-09-03weakened in debateReads parsed Forms 3/4/5: who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The model calculates an implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate of 0.212 (21.2%) that today's price would justify under the stated discount and terminal assumptions.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeTrailing twelve‑month free cash flow is $882,600,000 and free cash flow per share is $18.8188, on a price of $610.65 (price_to_fcf = 32.45).
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score. The argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
The positive quarter-to-quarter fundamentals (higher revenue, operating income, net income and EPS, plus a small decline in diluted shares) together with a meaningful trailing free cash flow ($882.6M, $18.82 per share) and recent defense and aerospace contract news form a coherent set of facts that support a favorable read on company performance. The revenue and profit improvements (fundamentals-0 through fundamentals-3) are concrete, company-reported outcomes for the most recent fiscal quarter and are consistent with pockets of commercial aerospace recovery and a defense win noted in multiple headlines (news-0 through news-3). The presence in a large S&P 500 ETF (ownership-0) indicates index-level institutional exposure, while valuation context (valuation-1, valuation-5) shows current multiples imply elevated expectations that are explainable by the company’s strong absolute FCF and share-count reduction (fundamentals-4). Against bear points about acquisition and government-contracting risks, those filings (filings-0 and filings-3) read as standard disclosures of external constraints and regulatory risk rather than direct evidence that the recent positive operating metrics are unreliable; likewise, the small 13F position noted (ownership-1) is a thin snapshot and carries the usual reporting lag (ownership-3).
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.42
24 surviving claims rest on 8 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 25% of them, and 94% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The surviving read draws on a small set of distinct sources and a relatively concentrated analyst contribution: a quarter of the surviving claims depend on a single analyst and most of the desk’s original points (94%) were upheld. That pattern means the read is informational but moderately fragile — source concentration and analyst dependence reduce the independent corroboration behind some claims, so treat the bundle as useful for situational awareness rather than a broad, heavily diversified evidence base.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment. When the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here (no outside knowledge, no browsing), and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
11 filings· 2 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data, not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.8 to the score
4 documents· 3 cited
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes−0.8 to the score
2 holdings records
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis−0.3 to the score
3 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only; it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal; the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
The full terminal on TDY Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Get this for the names you actually hold
Every name in your portfolio, researched the same way, plus the one thing no sample can show: how each one sits inside what you already own.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.