Featured researchA real report from the desk, on public data — this is what every report looks like.

TER

TERADYNE, INCEvidence as of 2026-09-03

Overview · TERADYNE, INC

Teradyne, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, sells, and supports automatic test equipment worldwide. The company operates through Semiconductor Test, System Test, Industrial Automation, and Wireless Test segments. The Semiconductor Test segment offers products and services for wafer level and device package testing in automotive, industrial, communications, consumer, smartphones, cloud computer and electronic game…

SectorTechnology
IndustrySemiconductor Equipment & Materials
Typeequity
ExchangeNASDAQ
Employees6,600
www.teradyne.com

Management team

Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.

Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.

Moneyta sentiment

Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.

Mixedhigh confidence
−2 · strongly unfavorable0 · balanced+2 · strongly favorable

−0.0 on a −2 to +2 scale — was +0.0 before the debate changed the read.

What builds the score

Fundamentals
+1.0
Filings and risk
+0.0
Market signals
−0.5
Ownership and flow
+0.3
Insider activity
−1.0

Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.

News tonecontext · not scored+0.4 observed
2 favorable2 neutral0 unfavorableacross 4 outlets · 5 stories deduped to 4 storylines

Editor's note

Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.

GoodwinAI editor

Evidence balance: Mixed ( -0.0 of a possible +2; was +0.0 before debate) · confidence high. The surviving financial claims show a material step-up in scale and profitability across three consecutive fiscal quarters. Reported revenues rose from $ 769,210,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 28 September 2025 to $ 1,282,494,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 29 March 2026 and to $ 1,328,990,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 28 June 2026, while gross profit increased from $ 449,306,000 to $ 780,949,000 and then $ 794,618,000 over the same sequence.

Operating income climbed from $ 145,303,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 28 September 2025 to $ 473,002,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 29 March 2026 and remained elevated at $ 437,810,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 28 June 2026; net income followed a similar path ($ 119,558,000 → $ 398,908,000 → $ 374,533,000). Diluted EPS rose from $ 0.75 to $ 2.53 and $ 2.38 while diluted share counts ticked down slightly; point-in-time common shares outstanding and a disclosed $ 157,475,000 of repurchases in the fiscal quarter ended 29 March 2026 support the repurchase activity claim.

How this note was made

every stage ran before the note was written
Analystsread the evidence
Debatebull ⇄ bear ×2
Chairrules on every claim
Riskstress-tests the read
Sentimentweighs what survived
Editorwrites the note

Analyst desk

Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.

MercerAI fundamentals analyst
+1.0

Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.

Reported revenues were $769,210,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 28 September 2025 and then rose to $1,282,494,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 29 March 2026 and to $1,328,990,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 28 June 2026.

XBRL companyfacts · 0001193125-25-258477

Gross profit increased from $449,306,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 28 September 2025 to $780,949,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 29 March 2026 and to $794,618,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 28 June 2026.

XBRL companyfacts · 0001193125-26-201058
OakesAI filings and risk analyst
+0.0

Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.

Which filings the desk reads

The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.

Two Form 4 filings for TERADYNE, INC were filed on 2026-08-18 with accession numbers the 4 filed 18 August 2026 and the 4 filed 18 August 2026.

4 filed 2026-08-18

The parse_status for both Form 4 filings is recorded as "skipped" in the provided evidence.

4 filed 2026-08-18
NashAI market signals analyst
+0.0

Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.

Trailing-12month risk is elevated: 90-day annualized volatility is +94.3% and the 90-day volatility ranks in the 94th percentile of the 547-stock research universe.

Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02

The stock shows strong long-term momentum: the 12_1 momentum measure is +288.4% and ranks in the 98th percentile of the 547-stock research universe.

Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02weakened in debate
EllisAI ownership and flow analyst
+0.0

Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.

As of 2026-09-02, the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) held 0.12% of the fund in TER.

ETF constituents · market data

Two Form 4 insider filings for TER were filed on 2026-08-18 (accessions the 4 filed 18 August 2026 and the 4 filed 18 August 2026).

Form 4 × 2 (90d window not enforced here)
YatesAI news analyst
+1.0

Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.

An item published 2 September 2026 reports Teradyne introduced three new UltraFLEXplus instruments targeting AI and data‑center semiconductor testing, affirmed a US$0.13 quarterly dividend, and noted the CEO was scheduled for a Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference fireside chat.

News · simplywall.st · 2026-09-02

Multiple press releases and a newswire item published 2 September 2026 announce that Teradyne's CEO is scheduled to participate in a fireside chat at the Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference on Wednesday, September 9, 2026, at 4:45 PM ET.

News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-02
TalbotAI insider activity analyst
−1.0

Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.

Gregory Stephen Smith (President and CEO) reported a sale of 4,000 shares for $1.7M on 2026-08-17 under a 10b5-1 plan (stated on the filing).

Form 4 · Smith Gregory Stephen (President and CEO) · $1.7M sold · 2026-08-17weakened in debate

Marilyn Matz (Director) reported a sale of 1,200 shares for $510k on 2026-08-17 under a 10b5-1 plan (stated on the filing).

Form 4 · MATZ MARILYN (Director) · $510k sold · 2026-08-17weakened in debate
ArcherAI valuation analyst
−1.0

Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.

The model shows an implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate of 0.8212 (82.12%) that today's price would justify under the stated discount and terminal assumptions.

Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD close

Price-to-trailing-twelve-month FCF is 225.26 based on the provided price and FCF_ttm.

Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD close

Debate and risk review

A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.

Debate1 round · 8 claims contested

A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.

The bull case

Several contemporaneous SEC-filed financial claims (fundamentals-0 through fundamentals-5 and valuation-5) jointly point to materially stronger operating performance and shareholder-return activity over the most recent quarters: revenues and gross profit roughly doubled from the September 2025 quarter to the March 2026 quarter and stayed elevated in June 2026, gross margins remained near 60%, operating income and net income expanded markedly, diluted EPS more than tripled versus the September 2025 quarter, and the company executed meaningful share repurchases while reporting cash on hand and no long-term debt. Market and news signals (market-1, news-0, news-3) provide corroborating context: the stock shows exceptionally strong long-term momentum and the company announced new AI/data-center test instruments and maintained a regular dividend, which together align with the revenue and product-cycle evidence. In response to the bear points about volatility, valuation, and insider selling: the high recent volatility and beta (market-0, market-3) are factual risk indicators but do not negate the SEC-reported jump in operating results; valuation multiples are elevated (valuation-0 through valuation-3) which the evidence shows, and that elevated pricing can coincide with strong operating leverage and product-driven revenue expansion; insider sales (insider-0 through insider-2) are documented and consistent with 10b5-1 disclosures while separate filings show active share-repurchase execution (fundamentals-5). Evidence strength: the core fundamental claims are high strength because they derive from recent SEC filings; market momentum and product-launch items are medium-strength corroboration from market signals and newswire items; valuation and volatility metrics are strong in the dataset and appropriately flagged as potential counterpoints.

The bear case

Chair's verdict, claim by claim

An item published 2 September 2026 reports Teradyne introduced three new UltraFLEXplus instruments targeting AI and data‑center semiconductor testing, affirmed a US$0.13 quarterly dividend, and noted the CEO was scheduled for a Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference fireside chat.Press items on 2 September 2026 mentioning product introductions, a US$0.13 quarterly dividend, and a scheduled CEO conference appearance are present in the news evidence.upheld
Multiple press releases and a newswire item published 2 September 2026 announce that Teradyne's CEO is scheduled to participate in a fireside chat at the Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference on Wednesday, September 9, 2026, at 4:45 PM ET.Multiple press releases and a newswire entry reporting the CEO's scheduled fireside chat on Sept 9, 2026 are documented in the evidence set.upheld
Trailing-12month risk is elevated: 90-day annualized volatility is +94.3% and the 90-day volatility ranks in the 94th percentile of the 547-stock research universe.The volatility and percentile metrics reported (90-day annualized vol 94.3%, 94th percentile) are present in the evidence.upheld
Risk review

Fragility · computed, not argued

balanced0.32

32 surviving claims rest on 16 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 19% of them, and 92% of what the desk raised survived the debate.

The evidence set rests on a moderate breadth of sources but a relatively small number of analysts carry a meaningful share of the surviving claims; that raises sensitivity to a few contributors and to any single-source corrections. High survival through debate suggests internal consistency, but source concentration and analyst dependence mean individual source errors or new parsed filings could materially change confidence in specific claims.

Peer context · computed, not argued

12-1 momentum ranks 2nd of 11 in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (as of 2026-09-02).

90-day volatility ranks 5th of 11 in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (as of 2026-09-02).

dividend yield ranks 5th of 11 in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (as of 2026-09-02).

Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers

Context

Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.

The street's viewAnalyst consensus · third-party
Buy Hold Sell Target

Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.

What this was built from

Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.

12 filings· 2 cited

SEC XBRL filings

Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.

Read by Mercer+1.0 to the score

2 documents

SEC filing documents

The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.

Read by Oakes+0.0 to the score

1 signal set

Moneyta signal set

Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.

Read by Nash−0.5 to the score

2 holdings records

Fund holdings

Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.

Read by Ellis+0.3 to the score

8 headlines· 2 cited

News coverage

Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.

Read by Yatesnothing survived

2 filings

Insider filings

Parsed Forms 3/4/5 from EDGAR: named insiders, share counts, prices, and 10b5-1 plan state — stated and inferred flags kept apart.

Read by Talbot−1.0 to the score

1 computation

Valuation inputs

TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.

Read by Archercontext only

1 record· 0 cited

Company profile

Sector, industry and company details.

Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.

Social sentiment

Crowd chatter as an evidence stream.

Coming soon

Aggregated tone from public social feeds will join the desk as its own evidence stream — read by its own analyst, contested in the same debate, and shown with the same sourcing as every other claim. Until it earns that bar, nothing renders here.

RPT-1b314911evidence 3963d1f2a3ebgenerated 9/3/2026, 4:02:51 AM · 89s15 model calls View trail

Written by AI, checked against sources

The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.

Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.

Get this for the tickers you actually hold

Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.

The full terminal on TER Gold

Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.

Unlock

Institutional holders

Net institutional flow, Q/Q

Largest holder position

Insider buys, 90 days

Clustered insider value

Street target range

The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.

Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.