Featured researchA real report from the desk, on public data — this is what every report looks like.

TRMB

TRIMBLE INC.Evidence as of 2026-09-03

Overview · TRIMBLE INC.

Trimble Inc. provides technology solutions that enable professionals and field mobile workers to enhance or transform their work processes worldwide. The company's Buildings and Infrastructure segment offers field and office software for route selection and design; systems to guide and control construction equipment; software for 3D design and data sharing; systems to monitor, track, and manage assets, equipment, and…

SectorTechnology
IndustryScientific & Technical Instruments
Typeequity
ExchangeNASDAQ
Employees11,825
www.trimble.com

Management team

  • Ms. Jennifer Allison · VP, General Counsel & SecretaryFind on LinkedIn
  • Mr. Garland L. Jackson Jr. · Senior VP & GM of Connected Asset Health Solutions - Trimble TransportationFind on LinkedIn
  • Dr. Peter O. Large · Senior Vice President of StrategyFind on LinkedIn
  • Mr. Ronald J. Bisio · Senior Vice President of Field SystemsFind on LinkedIn

Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.

Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.

Moneyta sentiment

Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.

Mixedhigh confidence
−2 · strongly unfavorable0 · balanced+2 · strongly favorable

−0.1 on a −2 to +2 scale.

What builds the score

Fundamentals
+0.0
Filings and risk
+0.0
Market signals
−0.8
Ownership and flow
+0.5

Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.

News tonecontext · not scored+1.0 observed
5 favorable0 neutral0 unfavorableacross 4 outlets

Editor's note

Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.

GoodwinAI editor

Evidence balance: Mixed ( -0.1 of a possible +2; confidence high). Revenue rose each reported quarter from $ 875,700,000 in fiscal Q2 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-08-01) to $ 972,000,000 in Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-08-07). Gross profit and implied gross margin edged higher across that same sequence (gross profit $ 597,900,000, margin ≈ 68.3% in Q2 2025 to $ 674,900,000, margin ≈ 69.5% in Q2 2026).

Operating income varied in a narrower band (for example $ 127,800,000 in Q2 2025, $ 150,500,000 in Q3 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-10-31), $ 144,000,000 in Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-05-01), and $ 132,000,000 in Q2 2026), implying operating margins around the mid-teens. Net income was positive in earlier periods ($ 89,200,000 in Q2 2025; $ 111,500,000 in Q3 2025; $ 98,900,000 in Q1 2026) but large and negative in Q2 2026 at -$ 471,700,000.

How this note was made

every stage ran before the note was written
Analystsread the evidence
Debatebull ⇄ bear ×2
Chairrules on every claim
Riskstress-tests the read
Sentimentweighs what survived
Editorwrites the note

Analyst desk

Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.

MercerAI fundamentals analyst
+0.0

Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.

Revenue (RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax) rose across the reported sequence: $875,700,000 in fiscal Q2 2025 (2025-04-05 to 2025-07-04), $901,200,000 in fiscal Q3 2025 (2025-07-05 to 2025-10-03), $939,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-03 to 2026-04-03), and $972,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-04 to 2026-07-03).

XBRL companyfacts · 0000864749-25-000245

Gross profit and implied gross margin were modestly higher over the same sequence: gross profit $597,900,000 (gross margin ≈ 68.3%) in fiscal Q2 2025, $621,100,000 (≈ 68.9%) in fiscal Q3 2025, $646,300,000 (≈ 68.8%) in fiscal Q1 2026, and $674,900,000 (≈ 69.5%) in fiscal Q2 2026.

XBRL companyfacts · 0000864749-25-000245
OakesAI filings and risk analyst
+0.0

Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.

Which filings the desk reads

The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.

A Form 3 (initial statement of beneficial ownership) for TRIMBLE INC. was filed on 2026-08-28.

3 filed 2026-08-28

The filing record for the 3 filed 28 August 2026 shows parse_status as "pending" and primary_doc_url as null in the provided evidence set.

3 filed 2026-08-28
NashAI market signals analyst
−1.0

Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.

As of 2026-09-02, short-term price momentum is +6.5% for 3 months while 6-month momentum is -15.5% and 12-month momentum (12_1) is -27.6%, with the 6-month momentum ranked in the 13th percentile of the 547-stock research universe and the 12_1 momentum in the 10th percentile.

Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02weakened in debate

As of 2026-09-02, relative strength versus SPY is negative: -27.5% over 6 months (13th percentile) and -45.3% over 12 months.

Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02
EllisAI ownership and flow analyst
+0.0

Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.

TRMB is a holding in the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) with a reported weight of 0.02% of the fund.

ETF constituents · market data

The ETF membership record is timestamped 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00 (data as of 2026-09-02).

ETF constituents · market data
YatesAI news analyst
+1.0

Reads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.

Multiple distinct filings-based stories report new institutional stakes in Trimble Inc., with Man Group plc, Sanctuary Advisors LLC, and Commerce Bank each reported buying positions during the second quarter.

News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-09-02

Coverage from financial commentary sites highlights valuation themes for Trimble, noting a 36.8% share-price decline over five years and framing the stock as possibly trading at a discount to cash-flow-based valuations.

News · simplywall.st · 2026-09-01
TalbotAI insider activity analyst
no data on file

Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.

No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.

ArcherAI valuation analyst
+0.0

Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.

Under the stated discount and terminal assumptions, today's price implies a free cash flow growth rate of 4.07% (implied_growth = 0.0407).

Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD close

Price-to-free-cash-flow (P/FCF) based on trailing twelve-month FCF is 16.26 (price_to_fcf = 16.26) and FCF per share is $3.6348.

Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD close

Debate and risk review

A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.

Debate1 round · 6 claims contested

A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.

The bull case

Several pieces of the evidence jointly support a favorable read on Trimble's operating profile and investor interest. Revenue and gross profit trended upward across the reported quarterly sequence (fundamentals-0, fundamentals-1), while trailing twelve-month free cash flow and operating cash flow are large and positive (valuation-3), which contrasts with the single-quarter negative EPS figure and indicates cash-generative operations. Diluted share counts have declined, which mechanically improves per-share cash-flow metrics (fundamentals-4), and multiple institutional filings and analyst coverage note new stakes and buy-oriented analyst posture, supporting demand-side interest (news-0, third-party street consensus). Valuation measures that reference cash flow — P/FCF 16.26 and an implied FCF growth of ~4.07% — present a framework where current price reflects those cash flows (valuation-0, valuation-1). Taken together, the operating cash generation, margin stability, share-count reduction, and fresh institutional/analyst attention support a favorable interpretation of the provided evidence.

The bear case

Chair's verdict, claim by claim

Multiple distinct filings-based stories report new institutional stakes in Trimble Inc., with Man Group plc, Sanctuary Advisors LLC, and Commerce Bank each reported buying positions during the second quarter.Filings‑based news items in the evidence set report new institutional stakes by the named managers during Q2.upheld
Coverage from financial commentary sites highlights valuation themes for Trimble, noting a 36.8% share-price decline over five years and framing the stock as possibly trading at a discount to cash-flow-based valuations.Third‑party commentary cited in the evidence highlights valuation themes and a multi‑year share‑price decline as stated.upheld
As of 2026-09-02, short-term price momentum is +6.5% for 3 months while 6-month momentum is -15.5% and 12-month momentum (12_1) is -27.6%, with the 6-month momentum ranked in the 13th percentile of the 547-stock research universe and the 12_1 momentum in the 10th percentile.Reported momentum percentiles are factually supported, but the accompanying base‑rate flag notes the 12‑1 momentum figure largely reflects a broader market pattern rather than being uniquely informative about this company.weakened
Risk review

Fragility · computed, not argued

balanced0.35

27 surviving claims rest on 12 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 22% of them, and 96% of what the desk raised survived the debate.

The surviving read is moderately durable: many claims (27) are supported but they come from a relatively small set of sources (12), so source breadth is limited. One analyst accounts for a meaningful share of the dossier, and the very high debate-survival rate indicates internal consensus — together these raise the possibility that a few new documents or a different analyst view could shift the overall picture.

Peer context · computed, not argued

12-1 momentum ranks 2nd of 2 in Scientific & Technical Instruments (as of 2026-09-02).

6-month relative strength ranks 2nd of 2 in Scientific & Technical Instruments (as of 2026-09-02).

90-day volatility ranks 2nd of 2 in Scientific & Technical Instruments (as of 2026-09-02).

dividend yield ranks 1st of 2 in Scientific & Technical Instruments (as of 2026-09-02).

Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers

Context

Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.

The street's viewAnalyst consensus · third-party · 2026-09-02
Buy Hold Sell Target

Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.

What this was built from

Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.

12 filings· 1 cited

SEC XBRL filings

Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.

Read by Mercer+0.0 to the score

1 document

SEC filing documents

The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.

Read by Oakes+0.0 to the score

1 signal set

Moneyta signal set

Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.

Read by Nash−0.8 to the score

1 holdings record

Fund holdings

Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.

Read by Ellis+0.5 to the score

8 headlines· 2 cited

News coverage

Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.

Read by Yatesnothing survived

1 computation

Valuation inputs

TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.

Read by Archercontext only

1 record· 0 cited

Company profile

Sector, industry and company details.

1 record· 0 cited

Analyst consensus

Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.

Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.

Social sentiment

Crowd chatter as an evidence stream.

Coming soon

Aggregated tone from public social feeds will join the desk as its own evidence stream — read by its own analyst, contested in the same debate, and shown with the same sourcing as every other claim. Until it earns that bar, nothing renders here.

RPT-cf4b0652evidence 513a8a3e12c2generated 9/3/2026, 4:14:40 AM · 79s14 model calls View trail

Written by AI, checked against sources

The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.

Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.

Get this for the tickers you actually hold

Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.

The full terminal on TRMB Gold

Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.

Unlock

Institutional holders

Net institutional flow, Q/Q

Largest holder position

Insider buys, 90 days

Clustered insider value

Street target range

The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.

Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.