TRMB
TRIMBLE INC.Evidence as of 2026-09-03The desk's Snapshot
3 of 15 open to everyone · members see allRead the full desk report on TRMB
Seven analysts, the debate, the risk review, every claim cited. And the same for every name you hold.
Free plan, no credit card required. Silver opens the full report, $19.99 a month. AI-written · every claim cites a source · Insight, not advice.
Overview · TRIMBLE INC.
Trimble Inc. provides technology solutions that enable professionals and field mobile workers to enhance or transform their work processes worldwide. The company's Buildings and Infrastructure segment offers field and office software for route selection and design; systems to guide and control construction equipment; software for 3D design and data sharing; systems to monitor, track, and manage assets, equipment, and…
Management team
- Ms. Jennifer Allison · VP, General Counsel & SecretaryFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Garland L. Jackson Jr. · Senior VP & GM of Connected Asset Health Solutions - Trimble TransportationFind on LinkedIn
- Dr. Peter O. Large · Senior Vice President of StrategyFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Ronald J. Bisio · Senior Vice President of Field SystemsFind on LinkedIn
Start free to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it, not a rating or a recommendation.
−0.1 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled. The rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
Evidence balance: Mixed ( -0.1 of a possible +2; confidence high). Revenue rose each reported quarter from $ 875,700,000 in fiscal Q2 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-08-01) to $ 972,000,000 in Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-08-07). Gross profit and implied gross margin edged higher across that same sequence (gross profit $ 597,900,000, margin ≈ 68.3% in Q2 2025 to $ 674,900,000, margin ≈ 69.5% in Q2 2026).
Operating income varied in a narrower band (for example $ 127,800,000 in Q2 2025, $ 150,500,000 in Q3 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-10-31), $ 144,000,000 in Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-05-01), and $ 132,000,000 in Q2 2026), implying operating margins around the mid-teens. Net income was positive in earlier periods ($ 89,200,000 in Q2 2025; $ 111,500,000 in Q3 2025; $ 98,900,000 in Q1 2026) but large and negative in Q2 2026 at -$ 471,700,000.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else (no outside knowledge, no browsing), so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC (revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter) and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue (RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax) rose across the reported sequence: $875,700,000 in fiscal Q2 2025 (2025-04-05 to 2025-07-04), $901,200,000 in fiscal Q3 2025 (2025-07-05 to 2025-10-03), $939,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-03 to 2026-04-03), and $972,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-04 to 2026-07-03).
XBRL companyfacts · 0000864749-25-000245Gross profit and implied gross margin were modestly higher over the same sequence: gross profit $597,900,000 (gross margin ≈ 68.3%) in fiscal Q2 2025, $621,100,000 (≈ 68.9%) in fiscal Q3 2025, $646,300,000 (≈ 68.8%) in fiscal Q1 2026, and $674,900,000 (≈ 69.5%) in fiscal Q2 2026.
XBRL companyfacts · 0000864749-25-000245Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full: its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet; its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
A Form 3 (initial statement of beneficial ownership) for TRIMBLE INC. was filed on 2026-08-28.
3 filed 2026-08-28The filing record for the 3 filed 28 August 2026 shows parse_status as "pending" and primary_doc_url as null in the provided evidence set.
3 filed 2026-08-28Reads the signal panel above (momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta) and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
As of 2026-09-02, short-term price momentum is +6.5% for 3 months while 6-month momentum is -15.5% and 12-month momentum (12_1) is -27.6%, with the 6-month momentum ranked in the 13th percentile of the 547-stock research universe and the 12_1 momentum in the 10th percentile.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02weakened in debateAs of 2026-09-02, relative strength versus SPY is negative: -27.5% over 6 months (13th percentile) and -45.3% over 12 months.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
TRMB is a holding in the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) with a reported weight of 0.02% of the fund.
ETF constituents · market dataThe ETF membership record is timestamped 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00 (data as of 2026-09-02).
ETF constituents · market dataReads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Multiple distinct filings-based stories report new institutional stakes in Trimble Inc., with Man Group plc, Sanctuary Advisors LLC, and Commerce Bank each reported buying positions during the second quarter.
News · thelincolnianonline.com · 2026-09-02Coverage from financial commentary sites highlights valuation themes for Trimble, noting a 36.8% share-price decline over five years and framing the stock as possibly trading at a discount to cash-flow-based valuations.
News · simplywall.st · 2026-09-01Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5: who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
Under the stated discount and terminal assumptions, today's price implies a free cash flow growth rate of 4.07% (implied_growth = 0.0407).
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closePrice-to-free-cash-flow (P/FCF) based on trailing twelve-month FCF is 16.26 (price_to_fcf = 16.26) and FCF per share is $3.6348.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score. The argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Several pieces of the evidence jointly support a favorable read on Trimble's operating profile and investor interest. Revenue and gross profit trended upward across the reported quarterly sequence (fundamentals-0, fundamentals-1), while trailing twelve-month free cash flow and operating cash flow are large and positive (valuation-3), which contrasts with the single-quarter negative EPS figure and indicates cash-generative operations. Diluted share counts have declined, which mechanically improves per-share cash-flow metrics (fundamentals-4), and multiple institutional filings and analyst coverage note new stakes and buy-oriented analyst posture, supporting demand-side interest (news-0, third-party street consensus). Valuation measures that reference cash flow — P/FCF 16.26 and an implied FCF growth of ~4.07% — present a framework where current price reflects those cash flows (valuation-0, valuation-1). Taken together, the operating cash generation, margin stability, share-count reduction, and fresh institutional/analyst attention support a favorable interpretation of the provided evidence.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.35
27 surviving claims rest on 12 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 22% of them, and 96% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The surviving read is moderately durable: many claims (27) are supported but they come from a relatively small set of sources (12), so source breadth is limited. One analyst accounts for a meaningful share of the dossier, and the very high debate-survival rate indicates internal consensus — together these raise the possibility that a few new documents or a different analyst view could shift the overall picture.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 2nd of 2 in Scientific & Technical Instruments (as of 2026-09-02).
6-month relative strength ranks 2nd of 2 in Scientific & Technical Instruments (as of 2026-09-02).
90-day volatility ranks 2nd of 2 in Scientific & Technical Instruments (as of 2026-09-02).
dividend yield ranks 1st of 2 in Scientific & Technical Instruments (as of 2026-09-02).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment. When the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here (no outside knowledge, no browsing), and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
12 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data, not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.0 to the score
1 document
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes+0.0 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash−0.8 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.5 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only; it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal; the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
The full terminal on TRMB Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Get this for the names you actually hold
Every name in your portfolio, researched the same way, plus the one thing no sample can show: how each one sits inside what you already own.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.