VRT
Vertiv Holdings CoEvidence as of 2026-09-03Overview · Vertiv Holdings Co
Vertiv Holdings Co, together with its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, and services critical digital infrastructure technologies and life cycle services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments in the Americas, the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. It offers AC and DC power management products, switchgear and busbar products, thermal management products…
Management team
- Ms. Cheryl H.J. Lim · Chief Human Resources OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Stephanie L. Gill Esq. · Chief Legal Counsel & Corporate SecretaryFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Scott A. Cripps · Chief Accounting Officer & Corporate ControllerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Stephen Liang · CTO & Executive VPFind on LinkedIn
Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.4 on a −2 to +2 scale — was +0.5 before the debate changed the read.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The evidence balance is constructive (+0.4 of a possible +2; was +0.5 before the debate) and confidence is high. For the fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-27 (Q2 2026) reported revenue was $3,274,300,000, up from $2,649,500,000 in the fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-20 (Q1 2026) and $2,638,100,000 in the quarter ended 2025-07-28 (Q2 2025). Operating income rose to $637,900,000 in Q2 2026 from $440,100,000 in Q1 2026 and $442,400,000 in Q2 2025, while net income increased to $497,800,000 from $390,100,000 and $324,200,000 over the same comparisons. Diluted EPS was $1.27 in Q2 2026 versus $0.99 in Q1 2026 and $0.83 in Q2 2025, cash and cash equivalents grew to $2,810,600,000 as of 30 June 2026 with long‑term debt near $2,939,800,000, and trailing twelve‑month metrics show P/E of 62.46, EV/EBITDA of 41.07, and P/FCF near 99.79.
Market signals are mixed but readably active: beta versus SPY is 2.73 with correlation 0.53, three‑year maximum drawdown is −61.3% (current drawdown −31.8%), short‑term vol is elevated (30‑day annualized +74.3%), and momentum measures span −22.5% over three months to +90.8% on the 12_1 measure. News coverage records an announced acquisition of Utility Innovation Holdings described as roughly $2.6 billion in total consideration (≈ $1.45 billion cash at closing plus up to $1.15 billion contingent on EBITDA targets) and a declared quarterly cash dividend of $0.0625 per Class A share.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenue in the quarter ended 30 June 2026 (fiscal Q2 2026, 2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30) was $3,274,300,000, up from $2,649,500,000 in the quarter ended 31 March 2026 (fiscal Q1 2026, 2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31) and from $2,638,100,000 in the quarter ended 30 June 2025 (2025-04-01 to 2025-06-30).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001628280-26-050609Operating income rose to $637,900,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30) from $440,100,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31) and from $442,400,000 in the quarter ended 30 June 2025 (2025-04-01 to 2025-06-30).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001628280-26-050609Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
Beta versus SPY is 2.73 and correlation with SPY is 0.53 as of 2026-09-02.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02Momentum over the most recent 3 months is -22.5%, while 6-month momentum is +2.2% and the 12_1 momentum measure is +90.8% (ranked in the 91th percentile of the 547-stock research universe) as of 2026-09-02.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02weakened in debateReads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00 the company is included in the IVV ETF with a weight of 0.2% of that fund.
ETF constituents · market dataThe provided evidence contains a single ETF membership record (IVV) with the timestamp 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00 and weight 0.2% of the fund.
ETF constituents · market dataReads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Several outlets report Vertiv announced an agreement to acquire Utility Innovation Holdings in a transaction described as roughly $2.6 billion in total consideration.
News · kalkinemedia.com · 2026-09-02Reported deal terms include approximately $1.45 billion in cash at closing plus up to $1.15 billion contingent on EBITDA targets over 12- and 24-month periods.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-02Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The model reports an implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate of 53.84% that today's price would justify under the stated discount and terminal assumptions.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closePrice-to-free-cash-flow (P/FCF) on the trailing twelve months is 99.79.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
The provided evidence jointly supports a constructive read: recent SEC-sourced quarterly results show clear sequential and year-over-year revenue, operating income, net income, and EPS growth (fundamentals-0 through fundamentals-3), alongside a meaningful increase in cash balances with largely stable long-term debt (fundamentals-5). Market and news signals complement those operating gains — 12-month momentum and relative strength are strongly positive (market-1, market-2), a strategic acquisition targeting grid/microgrid capabilities tied to AI/data-center demand was announced (news-0, news-1, news-2), and management declared a cash dividend (news-3) while the company appears in a broad-cap ETF (ownership-0). The bear points (valuation multiples and elevated volatility/drawdown) are based on trailing-price-sensitive metrics (valuation-0 through valuation-3, market-3, market-5); these are real and have strong evidence, but when weighed against strong recent operating performance and a large cash build, the fundamentals and strategic rationale provide a cohesive bullish narrative.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.43
24 surviving claims rest on 8 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 29% of them, and 98% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The evidence set rests on a moderate number of independent sources, so many claims are supported by documentary records and computed signals. However, nearly a third of surviving claims were advanced by the heaviest analyst and the debate survival rate was very high, which increases the risk that minority views or counter-evidence were under-explored.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 1st of 2 in Electrical Equipment & Parts (as of 2026-09-02).
6-month relative strength ranks 1st of 2 in Electrical Equipment & Parts (as of 2026-09-02).
90-day volatility ranks 1st of 2 in Electrical Equipment & Parts (as of 2026-09-02).
dividend yield ranks 2nd of 2 in Electrical Equipment & Parts (as of 2026-09-02).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
11 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.8 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash+0.0 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.5 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on VRT Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.