WY
WEYERHAEUSER COEvidence as of 2026-09-03Overview · WEYERHAEUSER CO
Weyerhaeuser Company, one of the world's largest private owners of timberlands, began operations in 1900. We own or control approximately 11 million acres of timberlands in the U.S. and manage additional timberlands under long-term licenses in Canada. We manage these timberlands on a sustainable basis in compliance with internationally recognized forestry standards. We are also one of the largest manufacturers of woo…
Management team
- Mr. Brian K. Chaney · Senior Vice President of Wood ProductsFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Keith J. O'Rear · Strategic AdvisorFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Travis A. Keatley · Senior Vice President of TimberlandsFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Russell S. Hagen · Senior VP & Chief Development OfficerFind on LinkedIn
Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.0 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The evidence balance is Mixed (+ 0.0 of a possible + 2; confidence high). Revenue rose from $ 1,717,000,000 in Q3 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-10-27) to $ 1,727,000,000 in Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-27) and to $ 1,867,000,000 in Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-27). Net income increased from $ 80,000,000 in Q3 2025 to $ 156,000,000 in Q1 2026 and $ 162,000,000 in Q2 2026, while gross profit expanded into Q1 2026 ($ 318,000,000) and compressed modestly in Q2 2026 ($ 311,000,000). Operating income improved versus Q3 2025 ($ 123,000,000) to $ 247,000,000 in Q1 2026 before dipping to $ 223,000,000 in Q2 2026, and weighted‑average diluted shares show a small net decline to about 721,901,000 in Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-27).
Balance-sheet and market evidence shows rising long‑term noncurrent debt from $ 4,268,000,000 as of 2025-06-30 to $ 5,303,000,000 as of 2026-06-30, cash of $ 527,000,000 as of 2026-06-30, and trailing‑twelve‑month FCF of $ 161,000,000. Market signals are mixed: low beta ( 0.31 ) and low correlation to SPY ( 0.15 ), negative short‑ to medium‑term momentum (3m − 4.4%, 6m − 4.9%) but positive 12_1 momentum (+ 6.6%), a golden cross in place for 65 days while price sits below both the 50‑ and 200‑day SMAs (price_vs_sma50 − 4.3%, price_vs_sma200 − 3.5%), elevated volatility (30‑day annualized + 31.6%, 90‑day + 28.7%), and multi‑year drawdowns (max_drawdown_3y − 38.0%, drawdown_from_3y_high − 30.9%). Valuation metrics in the packet show P/FCF ~ 103.98, EV/EBITDA ~ 17.04, P/E TTM ~ 34.1, and an implied FCF growth rate the current price would justify of 0.5517 (55.17%) as of price date 2026-09-02.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Revenues increased from $1,717,000,000 in fiscal Q3 2025 (2025-07-01 to 2025-09-30, 3mo) to $1,727,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) and to $1,867,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001193125-25-260808Net income rose from $80,000,000 in fiscal Q3 2025 (2025-07-01 to 2025-09-30, 3mo) to $156,000,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) and to $162,000,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001193125-25-260808Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
An Item 8-K report for WEYERHAEUSER CO with the 8-K filed 27 August 2026 was filed on 2026-08-27.
8-K filed 2026-08-27weakened in debateThe provided evidence record shows the 8-K's parse_status as "pending" in the data extract dated 2026-08-27.
8-K filed 2026-08-27Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
As of 2026-09-02, beta versus SPY is 0.31 and correlation versus SPY is 0.15, indicating low market sensitivity and low linear co-movement with the S&P 500 proxy.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02Short- to medium-term price momentum is negative: momentum_3m is -4.4% and momentum_6m is -4.9%, while the 12_1 momentum measure is +6.6%.
Moneyta signal set · 2026-09-02weakened in debateReads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 2026-09-02, WY appears in the holdings of ETF IVV with a weight of 0.03% of that fund.
ETF constituents · market dataThe provided ownership evidence contains a single ETF membership record (IVV) dated 2026-09-02 and does not show other ETF weights or additional ownership records.
ETF constituents · market dataReads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Multiple headlines discuss valuation and whether the shares are undervalued or reasonably priced, including a Simply Wall St piece published 2026-09-02 and a GuruFocus note on 2026-08-20 comparing a GF value to market price.
News · simplywall.st · 2026-09-02Several items are company-specific investor-communications: two outlets reported updated or posted investor presentation materials on 2026-08-28 and 2026-08-27, and Simply Wall St noted a board dividend affirmation on 2026-08-26.
News · gurufocus.com · 2026-08-28Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate that today's price would justify is 0.5517 (55.17%), calculated as of price date 2026-09-02 under the stated discount and terminal assumptions.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closePrice to trailing-twelve-month free cash flow (P/FCF) is 103.98 based on FCF TTM of $161,000,000 and price as of 2026-09-02.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
The set of fundamentals claims jointly support a favorable read: revenues and net income rose across the sequential quarter series (fundamentals-0, fundamentals-1), gross profit and operating income improved materially versus the Q3 2025 baseline (fundamentals-2, fundamentals-3), and the diluted share count shows a small net decline that would mechanically help per‑share metrics (fundamentals-4). Market characteristics consistent with a lower market beta and a meaningful dividend yield provide a stability/income dimension that complements the operating improvements (market-0, market-5). The bear points relying on recent price momentum, elevated volatility, multi‑year drawdowns, and valuation-model outputs are partly based on market-price dynamics or modeling assumptions rather than the company’s recent sequential operating results; those market-driven signals (market-1, market-3, market-4, valuation-0, valuation-1) can be noisy when viewed alongside improving quarterly operating performance. The increase in long‑term debt (fundamentals-5) is a valid concern, but the evidence set also shows a positive cash balance on the balance sheet (valuation-4) and the filings evidence is thin or pending (filings-0, filings-1, filings-2), weakening the bear narrative that relies on up‑to‑date negative disclosures.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.33
27 surviving claims rest on 13 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 22% of them, and 96% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The surviving set is moderately concentrated: 27 claims rely on 13 distinct sources and one analyst accounts for about a fifth of the desk's inputs, so a small number of contributors carry outsized influence. Because 96% of raised points survived debate, the record is internally consistent but also potentially brittle to new contradictory filings or a single major source correction — treat the read as informative but weight it with caution given the source concentration.
Peer context · computed, not argued
12-1 momentum ranks 4th of 7 in REIT—Specialty (as of 2026-09-02).
90-day volatility ranks 6th of 7 in REIT—Specialty (as of 2026-09-02).
dividend yield ranks 4th of 7 in REIT—Specialty (as of 2026-09-02).
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
11 filings· 1 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+0.3 to the score
1 document
SEC filing documents
The filings themselves, including the year-over-year comparison of Item 1A risk factors.
Read by Oakes+0.0 to the score
1 signal set
Moneyta signal set
Computed from our own end-of-day price history and ranked against the whole research universe. No AI involved.
Read by Nash−0.3 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on WY Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.