WYNN
WYNN RESORTS LTDEvidence as of 2026-09-03Overview · WYNN RESORTS LTD
Wynn Resorts, Limited designs, develops, and operates integrated resorts. The company operates through four segments: Wynn Palace, Wynn Macau, Las Vegas Operations, and Encore Boston Harbor. The Wynn Palace segment operates private gaming salons and sky casinos; a luxury hotel tower with suites, and villas, including a health club, spa, salon, and pool; food and beverage outlets; retail space; meeting and convention…
Management team
- Mr. Craig Jeffrey Fullalove · CFO & CAO of Wynn Macau LimitedFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Jacqui Krum · Executive VP, General Counsel & SecretaryFind on LinkedIn
- Ms. Julie Mireille Cameron-Doe · Chief Financial OfficerFind on LinkedIn
- Mr. Craig Scott Billings · CEO & DirectorFind on LinkedIn
Start your 7-day free trial to see the full management team.
Links open LinkedIn searches, not verified profiles. Team data from our market-data vendor's company profile.
Moneyta sentiment
Where the published evidence leans after the desk debated it — not a rating or a recommendation.
+0.5 on a −2 to +2 scale.
What builds the score
Solid bars are analyst rubric scores; faded bars are computed directly from data. Claims dropped in debate count for nothing; weakened claims count at half weight.
Editor's note
Written after the debate settled — the rest of the page is the evidence behind it.
The surviving evidence produces a constructive balance (+0.5 of a possible +2; was +0.5 before the debate) with high confidence. Diluted weighted‑average shares outstanding are reported at 102,983,000 in Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-07-31), down from 103,800,000 in Q1 2026 (fiscal quarter ended 2026-04-30) and 105,730,000 in the quarter ended 31 March 2025. Reported net income rose across the recent comparable quarters from $ 66,218,000 in Q2 2025 (fiscal quarter ended 2025-07-30) to $ 140,062,000 in Q2 2026, while operating income moved from $ 264,600,000 to $ 297,588,000 over the same span.
Balance-sheet and valuation facts survive the desk review: long‑term debt stands near $ 10.72466 billion as of 30 June 2026, cash is $ 1,573,353,000, enterprise value is about $ 18,575,477,504 versus market capitalization of $ 9,424,170,504, and trailing twelve‑month free cash flow is $ 210,651,000 (FCF per share TTM $ 2.0455, P/FCF 44.74). The model-implied FCF growth rate consistent with today’s price is about 29.87%, and conventional finance literature notes that such high implied growth requires correspondingly strong operational or structural change to be plausible.
How this note was made
every stage ran before the note was writtenAnalyst desk
Mercer, Oakes, Nash, Ellis, Yates, Talbot and Archer. The desk: named AI agents, not people. Each reads one slice of the evidence and nothing else — no outside knowledge, no browsing — so every finding traces to a source you can open.
Reads the XBRL figures companies file with the SEC — revenue, margins, income, debt and share count, quarter by quarter — and reports which way the trend is running.
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding declined to 102,983,000 in fiscal Q2 2026 (2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30, 3mo) from 103,800,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo) and 105,730,000 in the quarter ended 31 March 2025.
XBRL companyfacts · 0001174922-26-000055The company recorded cash payments for repurchase of common stock of $70,047,000 in fiscal Q1 2026 (2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, 3mo).
XBRL companyfacts · 0001174922-26-000035Reads the filings themselves, above all the year-over-year diff of Item 1A risk factors: which risks a company added, dropped or quietly reworded since its last annual report.
Nothing in this slice of the evidence rose to a claim — a quiet read, which itself is information.
Which filings the desk reads
The desk reads the annual 10-K in full — its risk factors, and how they changed since last year. Quarterly 10-Qs and event filings (8-Ks, insider Form 4s) are listed for context but not read line by line: the 10-K is where the material risk disclosures live. A brand-new company, or one we have only just begun tracking, may have no annual report on file yet — its risk analysis fills in once that lands.
Reads the signal panel above — momentum, volatility, drawdown, relative strength and beta — and ranks each against the whole research universe rather than judging it in isolation.
No computed signal history for this symbol yet — signals need roughly 70 trading days of price history.
Reads which funds hold the name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings, to show the exposure you may already carry through index funds.
As of 2026-09-02T13:45:47.228469+00:00, WYNN is a constituent of the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at a weight of 0.01% of the fund.
ETF constituents · market dataA 0.01% weight in IVV indicates a very small position size within that large-cap index fund, implying limited passive ETF-driven exposure to WYNN from this particular fund holding.
ETF constituents · market dataReads recent headlines that are genuinely about this company, ignoring rating chatter and market-wide stories. Findings argue in the debate but never move the sentiment score.
Multiple outlets reported that Wynn Resorts’ latest quarter, covered in articles published 1 September 2026, beat analyst expectations on revenue and earnings per share and showed notable revenue growth versus the prior year.
News · finance.yahoo.com · 2026-09-01Coverage noted that Macau performance was a driving factor in the company’s results in reporting around 1 September 2026.
News · kalkinemedia.com · 2026-09-01Reads parsed Forms 3/4/5 — who bought or sold, at what size, and whether a 10b5-1 plan was involved. Flags clustered open-market officer buying; treats plan sales as routine and never counts a fund or 10%-holder as an officer.
No insider transactions on file in the trailing 180 days.
Reads the implied-expectations math built from the company's own filings (the growth rate today's price would justify, and the multiples beside it) and argues whether the market's bar looks high or low for this business. Never turns the math into a target.
The model-calculated implied free cash flow (FCF) growth rate that today's price would justify, under the stated discount and terminal assumptions, is 29.87%.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closePrice-to-FCF (TTM) is 44.74 and FCF per share (TTM) is $2.0455, meaning the market price implies a relatively high multiple on the company's current free cash flow run rate.
Valuation inputs · SEC XBRL + stored EOD closeDebate and risk review
A bull and a bear contest the claims and the chair rules on each; the risk review stress-tests what survived.
A bull and a bear argue the analysts' claims across two rounds, then a chair rules on each one. Only what survives feeds the score — the argument is shown, not hidden, so you can judge the reasoning yourself.
Several company-reported fundamentals and recent coverage collectively support a favorable read. Quarterly net income and operating income show multi-quarter improvement, while diluted shares outstanding declined quarter-over-quarter and documented repurchases indicate active capital return that amplifies per-share earnings trends. Stockholders’ equity moved substantially toward neutral over the past year, reducing balance-sheet strain noted earlier. Market coverage and sell-side activity also leaned positive: multiple outlets reported an earnings beat driven in part by Macau performance, and the street consensus is heavily weighted to buy initiations. These points counter balance valuation-model flags by showing improving core profitability and shareholder-friendly capital actions that underlie the earnings and analyst optimism.
Chair's verdict, claim by claim
Fragility · computed, not argued
balanced0.36
19 surviving claims rest on 9 distinct sources; the heaviest analyst carries 32% of them, and 100% of what the desk raised survived the debate.
The read rests on a moderate number of distinct sources but a fair amount of surviving detail (19 claims from 9 sources) and one analyst supplying nearly a third of surviving items — that concentration means parts of the narrative hinge on a small set of inputs. Because everything the desk raised survived the debate, there is low internal dispute, but survival alone doesn't eliminate vulnerability to single-source errors or later restatements.
Disconfirming evidence · base rates · falsifiers
Context
Outside consensus, and where this name already sits in your own portfolio.
Third-party consensus shown for context. It never enters Moneyta sentiment — when the two diverge, the debate above is where the why lives.
What this was built from
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. The desk reads only what is listed here — no outside knowledge, no browsing — and each card shows who read it and what it contributed to the score.
12 filings· 2 cited
SEC XBRL filings
Quarterly figures as filed with the SEC, read straight from EDGAR's structured data — not retyped or estimated.
Read by Mercer+1.0 to the score
1 holdings record
Fund holdings
Which funds hold this name and at what weight, plus insider Form 4 filings.
Read by Ellis+0.0 to the score
8 headlines· 2 cited
News coverage
Recent headlines about this company, rating chatter excluded and nothing published after the report date.
Read by Yatesnothing survived
1 computation
Valuation inputs
TTM cash-flow figures from the company's own XBRL filings, priced with the stored closing price. Implied growth and multiples only; no fair-value dollar figure reaches the desk, by design.
Read by Archercontext only
1 record· 0 cited
Company profile
Sector, industry and company details.
1 record· 0 cited
Analyst consensus
Third-party consensus, shown for context only — it never enters Moneyta sentiment.
Read means we pulled and handed it to an analyst; cited means a claim on this page points at it. Reading twelve quarters to state one trend is normal — the gap is shown rather than hidden.
Written by AI, checked against sources
The analysts, the bull–bear debate and the editor's note are AI agents reading only the evidence listed on this page. They can misread a filing or a headline, which is why every claim cites a source you can open and check yourself. The sentiment score is arithmetic over the claims that survived the debate, not a language model's opinion.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations. Past patterns do not indicate future results.
Get this for the tickers you actually hold
Plus the one thing no sample can show: how each name correlates with your portfolio, and what hides inside your funds.
The full terminal on WYNN Gold
Who holds it, who's buying, what the Street thinks: live behind the lock, updated as filings land.
Institutional holders
Net institutional flow, Q/Q
Largest holder position
Insider buys, 90 days
Clustered insider value
Street target range
The real figures are for members. Educational analysis, not advice.
Educational analysis of published data. Moneyta does not give investment advice or make recommendations.